Where do the highest-energy cosmic rays come from? Not from gamma-ray bursts, says IceCube study

Apr 18, 2012
IceCube’s 5,160 digital optical modules are suspended from 86 strings reaching a mile and a half below the surface at the South Pole. Each sphere contains a photomultiplier tube and electronics to capture the faint flashes of muons speeding through the ice, their direction and energy -- and thus that of the neutrinos that created them -- tracked by multiple detections. At lower left is the processed signal of an energetic muon moving upward through the array, created by a neutrino that traveled all the way through the Earth. Credit: IceCube Collaboration and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

The IceCube neutrino telescope encompasses a cubic kilometer of clear Antarctic ice under the South Pole, a volume seeded with an array of 5,160 sensitive digital optical modules (DOMs) that precisely track the direction and energy of speeding muons, massive cousins of the electron, which are created when neutrinos collide with atoms in the ice. The IceCube Collaboration recently announced the results of an exhaustive search for high-energy neutrinos that would likely be produced if the violent extragalactic explosions known as gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the source of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays.

"According to a leading model, we would have expected to see 8.4 events corresponding to GRB production of in the IceCube data used for this search," says Spencer Klein of the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab), who is a long-time member of the IceCube Collaboration. "We didn't see any, which indicates that GRBs are not the source of ultra-high-energy ."

"This result represents a coming-of-age of neutrino astronomy," says Nathan Whitehorn from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who led the recent GRB research with Peter Redl of the University of Maryland. "IceCube, while still under construction, was able to rule out 15 years of predictions and has begun to challenge one of only two major possibilities for the origin of the highest-energy cosmic rays, namely gamma-ray bursts and ."

Redl says, "While not finding a neutrino signal originating from GRBs was disappointing, this is the first neutrino astronomy result that is able to strongly constrain extra-galactic astrophysics models, and therefore marks the beginning of an exciting new era of neutrino astronomy."

The IceCube Collaboration's report on the search appears in the April 19, 2012, issue of the journal Nature.

Blazing fireballs and nature's accelerators

Cosmic rays are from deep in outer space – predominately protons, the bare nuclei of hydrogen atoms, plus some heavier atomic nuclei. Most probably acquire their energy when naturally accelerated by exploding stars. A few rare cosmic rays pack an astonishing wallop, however, with energies prodigiously greater than the highest ever attained by human-made accelerators like CERN's Large Hadron Collider. Their sources are a mystery.

"Nature is capable of accelerating elementary particles to macroscopic energies," says Francis Halzen, IceCube's principal investigator and a professor of physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "There are basically only two ideas on how she does this: in gravitationally driven particle flows near the supermassive black holes at the centers of active galaxies, and in the collapse of stars to a black hole, seen by astronomers as gamma ray bursts."

Klein, the deputy director of Berkeley Lab's Nuclear Science Division (NSD, explains that in active galactic nuclei (AGNs) "the black holes suck in matter and eject enormous particle jets, perpendicular to the galactic disk, which could act as strong linear accelerators." Of gamma-ray bursts he says, "Some GRBs are thought to be collapses of supermassive stars – hypernova – while others are thought to be collisions of black holes with other black holes or neutron stars. Both types produce brief but intense blasts of radiation."

The IceCube Lab in the setting sun at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica inlate March, 2012. IceCube uses a cubic kilometer of ice to house over 5,000 optical modulesthat are connected via cable to the lab. (Photo: NSF/S. Lidstrom)

The massive fireballs move away from the explosion at nearly the speed of light, releasing most of their energy as gamma rays. The fireballs that give rise to this radiation might also accelerate particles to very high energies through a jet mechanism similar to that in AGNs, although compressed into a much smaller volume.

Accelerated protons in a GRB's jets should interact with the intense gamma-ray background and strong magnetic fields to produce neutrinos with energies about five percent of the proton energy, together with much higher-energy neutrinos near the end of the acceleration process.

Neutrinos come in three different types that change and mix as they travel to Earth; the total flux can be estimated from the muon neutrinos that IceCube concentrates on. The muons these neutrinos create can travel up to 10 kilometers through the . Thus many neutrino interactions occur outside the actual dimensions of the IceCube array but are nevertheless visible to IceCube's detectors, effectively enlarging the telescope's aperture.

"The way we search for GRB neutrinos is that we build a huge detector and then we just watch and wait," says Klein. "When it comes to detecting neutrinos, size really does matter."

IceCube watches with its over 5,000 DOMs, digital optical modules conceived, designed, and proven by Berkeley Lab physicists and engineers, which detect the faint light from each passing muon. Scientists can rely on their remarkable dependability to wait as long as necessary. Almost no failures occurred after the DOMs were installed; 98 percent are working perfectly and another one percent are usable. Now frozen in the ice, they will never be seen again.

IceCube records a million times more muon tracks moving downward through the ice than upward, mainly debris from direct cosmic-ray hits on the surface or secondary products of cosmic-ray collisions with Earth's atmosphere. Muons moving upward, however, signal neutrinos that have passed all the way through Earth. When the telescope is searching for bright neutrino sources in the northern sky, the planet makes a marvelous filter.

A fireball produced in a black-hole collision or by the collapse of a gigantic star can form jets in which protons and heavier nuclei are accelerated and shock waves produce a burst of gamma rays. The fireball model also predicts the creation of very high energy neutrinos, which ought to be detectable shortly after the gamma-ray burst becomes visible from Earth. Credit: Image by Dana Berry/NASA

Zeroing in on gamma-ray bursts

A network of satellites circles the globe and reports almost 700 GRBs each year, which readily stand out from the cosmic background. They're timed, their positions are triangulated, and the data are distributed by an international group of researchers. Some blaze for less than two seconds and others for a few minutes. Neutrinos they produce should arrive at IceCube during the burst or close to it.

"IceCube's precision timing and charge resolution, plus its large size, allow it to precisely determine where a neutrino comes from – often to within one degree," says Lisa Gerhardt of Berkeley Lab, whose research has focused on detecting ultra-high-energy neutrino interactions. Indeed, a GRB neutrino should send a muon track through the ice with an angular resolution of about one degree with respect to the GRB's position in the sky.

IceCube researchers sifted through data on 307 GRBs from two periods in 2008 and 2009 when IceCube was still under construction, looking for records of muon trails coincident in time and space with GRBs. (Forty strings, with 60 DOMs each, had been installed by 2008, and 59 strings by 2009. The finished IceCube has 86 strings.) The fireball model predicted that when the expected flux from all the samples had been summed, at least 8.4 related muon events would be found within 10 degrees of a GRB during the seconds or minutes when it was blazing brightly.

"Different calculations of the neutrino flux from GRBs are based on slightly different assumptions about how the neutrinos are produced and on uncertainties such as how fast the fireball is moving toward us," says Klein. "Among the published predictions, the lowest estimate of neutrino production is about a quarter of what the fireball model predicts. That's barely consistent with our zero observations."

Says Halzen, "After observing gamma-ray bursts for two years, we have not detected the telltale neutrinos for cosmic ray acceleration."

If it's likely that GRBs aren't up to the task of accelerating cosmic rays to ultra-high-energies, what are the options? Klein points to a salient fact about natural accelerators: a small, rapidly spinning object must accelerate particles very rapidly; this requires an extremely energy-dense environment, and there are many ways the particles could lose energy during the acceleration process.

"But remember the other popular model of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, active galactic nuclei," says Klein. "GRBs are small, but AGNs are big – great big accelerators that may be able to accelerate particles to very high energies without significant loss."

Are AGNs the real source of the highest-energy cosmic rays? IceCube has looked for neutrinos from active galactic nuclei, but as yet the data sets are not sensitive enough to set significant limits. For now, IceCube has nothing to say on the subject – beyond the fact that the fireball model of GRBs can't meet the specs.

Explore further: And so they beat on, flagella against the cantilever

More information: "An absence of neutrinos associated with cosmic ray acceleration in gamma-ray bursts," by R. Abbasi et al (the IceCube Collaboration), appears in the April 19, 2012, issue of Nature. www.nature.com/nature/index.html

Related Stories

IceCube neutrino observatory nears completion

Aug 31, 2010

In December 2010, IceCube -- the world's first kilometer-scale neutrino observatory, which is located beneath the Antarctic ice -- will finally be completed after two decades of planning. In an article in ...

IceCube researchers come up empty on first neutrino test

Apr 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicist Nathan Whitehorn and a team of researchers with the IceCube collaboration have failed to come up with evidence to prove that neutrinos come from, or are caused by, gamma ray bursts, ...

Antarctic "Telescopes" Look for Cosmic Rays

Feb 08, 2005

Working in the harsh conditions of Antarctica, Maryland researchers are creating new ways of detecting cosmic rays, high energy particles that bombard the Earth from beyond our solar system.

Recommended for you

Magnetic neural control with nanoparticles

5 minutes ago

Magnetic nanoparticles don't have to be "one size fits all." Instead, individual magnetic nanoparticles can be tailored in an array of differing sizes and compositions to allow for heating them separately ...

The curious case of the fluctuating speed of light

15 minutes ago

Suppose you were an electrician. You've trained, apprenticed, passed all your certifications, and you've worked with electric wiring for years. You've wired houses and commercial buildings for years, and ...

And so they beat on, flagella against the cantilever

Sep 16, 2014

A team of researchers at Boston University and Stanford University School of Medicine has developed a new model to study the motion patterns of bacteria in real time and to determine how these motions relate ...

Tandem microwave destroys hazmat, disinfects

Sep 16, 2014

Dangerous materials can be destroyed, bacteria spores can be disinfected, and information can be collected that reveals the country of origin of radiological isotopes - all of this due to a commercial microwave ...

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tachyon8491
2.5 / 5 (8) Apr 18, 2012
Nice solid evidence that at least rules out ambiguity.
Lurker2358
1.2 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2012
Ironically, a poster named tachyon posts ahead of me.

Consider Tachyon collisions as a possible source for extremely energetic classical particles.
TheGhostofOtto1923
5 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2012
Ironically, a poster named tachyon posts ahead of me.

Consider Tachyon collisions as a possible source for extremely energetic classical particles.
And exactly how would scientists do this in some meaningful way?
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (10) Apr 18, 2012
Search: Prime functional index- Cosmological Index
see Cosmology Vedas interlinks- vidyardhicosmology [dot] blogspot [dot]com/
The subject attracts space-Cosmology groups, Philosophers and Religious groups-
Kushmandam to catch-up with Brahmandam- Spiral milky way to Cosmic Pot Energy of the Universe-Vidyardhi nanduri
vidyunmaya
1 / 5 (9) Apr 18, 2012
Search further- Incomplete perceptions
http://www.facebo...14412901
East West Cosmological dialogues and a center for Interaction helps in time- Nature creates Necessity-Demand structure
Urgelt
not rated yet Apr 18, 2012
Ice Cube is indeed a marvelous instrument, but...

I'm choking on probability theory here. If the expectation is to detect 8 muons during a GRB - out of some vast number of undetected neutrinos - what is the probability distribution around 8 expected to be? Zero to some much larger number, weighted heavily at zero, perhaps?

I think we ought to be cautious about our conclusions.
Thadieus
2.3 / 5 (3) Apr 18, 2012
Well one thing for sure is the cosmic rays do not come from "Dark Matter"
stealthc
1 / 5 (5) Apr 19, 2012
a few days ago there was an article on accelerating particles to infinity. These AGN could certainly do that and it would explain where such high energy particles come from. What's more energetic, a super-nova, or an AGN? (AGN in my opinion). I love it how scientists try to make figuring out the obvious into such an epic quest.
jsdarkdestruction
5 / 5 (1) Apr 20, 2012
how could agn accelerate particles to infinity? agn do not possess infinite energy, which is needed to speed anything with mass that fast. also, its not your opinion agn put out more energy, its fact.
Ojorf
5 / 5 (1) Apr 22, 2012
a few days ago there was an article on accelerating particles to infinity.

Not quite, it was about how a magnetic field can accelerate a particle to escape from the field to 'infinity' and beeeeyond....
nothing infinite about the speed or acceleration.