New study traces the evolutionary history of what mammals eat

Apr 16, 2012
This is an elk cow browsing. Elk are herbivores. Credit: Photo by Win McLaughlin

The feeding habits of mammals haven't always been what they are today, particularly for omnivores, finds a new study.

Some groups of mammals almost exclusively eat meat -- take lions and tigers and other , for example. Other mammals such as deer, cows and are predominantly plant-eaters, living on a of leaves, shoots, fruits and bark. But particularly for omnivores that live on plant foods in addition to meat, the situation wasn't always that way, finds a new study by researchers working at the National Center in Durham, North Carolina.

Past studies have shown that animals with similar diets tend to share certain characteristics. But this study is the first of its kind to look across all mammal groups, including omnivores, to reconstruct how mammal diets have changed over .

To do that, the researchers compiled previously published diet data for more than 1500 species representing more than one third of mammals alive today, including , ungulates, bats, rabbits and rodents.

By mapping that data onto the mammal family tree, the researchers were able to trace backwards in time and infer what the ancestors of each species most likely ate.

These are big-horn sheep grazing (Ovis canadensis). Big-horn sheep are herbivores. Credit: Photo by Samantha Price

They found that while some groups of mammals maintained steady diets, others changed their feeding strategies over time.

Today's omnivores in particular — a group that includes primates, bears, dogs and foxes — came from ancestors that primarily ate plants, or animals, but not both, said co-author Samantha Price of the University of California Davis.

While omnivorous mammals weren't always that way, plant-eaters and meat-eaters have diversified within a more well-worn path. Radical shifts were unlikely for these animals. Mammals that eat meat for a living, for example, never gave up their taste for flesh without transitioning through an omnivorous stage first.

"Direct transitions from carnivory to herbivory were essentially nonexistent," said co-author Louise Roth of Duke University. "It's an intuitive result because it takes very different kinds of equipment to have those kinds of diets," she added.

"Plant- and animal-based foods require different digestive chemistries and different processing mechanisms in the mouth and stomach," explained co-author Samantha Hopkins of the University of Oregon. The kinds of teeth adapted for tearing and slicing meat, for example, are remarkably different from the large, flat-topped molars adapted for grinding nuts and roots.

A golden-mantled ground squirrel (Spermophilus lateralis) munches on an insect. Golden-mantled ground squirrels are omnivores. Credit: Photo by Win McLaughlin

"[Given these differences] it makes sense that you couldn't easily transition from one to the other in one step," Price added.

The researchers found that diet is also linked to how fast spawn new species. As new species arise and others go extinct, on balance the plant-eaters proliferate faster than their meat-eating counterparts, with omnivores lagging behind both groups.

"If there was an evolutionary race to evolve 100 species, it would take three times longer for omnivores compared to herbivores, and carnivores would be in the middle," Price said.

The study will appear in the online early edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the week of April 16, 2012.

Explore further: Cat dentals fill you with dread?

More information: "Tempo of trophic evolution and its impact on mammalian diversification." Price, S., S. Hopkins, et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (2012).

Related Stories

Evolution of whale size linked to diet

May 20, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The wide range of body sizes among whales arose early in their evolution and was associated with changes in diet, according to a new study by researchers at UC Davis and UCLA. The study appears in today's ...

Socialising led to bigger brains in some mammals

Nov 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Over millions of years dogs have developed bigger brains than cats because highly social species of mammals need more brain power than solitary animals, according to a study by Oxford University.

Recommended for you

Cat dentals fill you with dread?

3 hours ago

A survey published this year found that over 50% of final year veterinary students in the UK do not feel confident either in discussing orodental problems with clients or in performing a detailed examination of the oral cavity ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

bewertow
Apr 16, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Roland
not rated yet Apr 16, 2012
You want crazy? Google "deer that eat meat".
http://news.natio...eer.html
JVK
1 / 5 (1) Apr 17, 2012
Re: "The researchers found that diet is also linked to how fast mammals spawn new species." Is it not well-known that nutrient chemicals and their metabolism to species specific pheromones are directly responsible for speciation via their epigenetic effects?