Drastic changes needed to curb N2O, most potent greenhouse gas: study

Apr 12, 2012

Meat consumption in the developed world needs to be cut by 50 per cent per person by 2050 if we are to meet the most aggressive strategy, set out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), to reduce one of the most important greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O).

This is the finding from a new study, published today, 13 April, in IOP Publishing's , which also claims that N2O emissions from the industrial and agricultural sectors will also need to be cut by 50 per cent if targets are to be met.

The findings have been made by Dr Eric A Davidson of The Woods Hole Research Center, Massachusetts, and demonstrate the magnitude of changes needed to stabilise atmospheric N2O concentrations as well as improve the diets of the growing human population.

N2O is the third highest contributor to climate change behind carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4); however, it poses a greater challenge to mitigate as nitrogen is an essential element for food production.

It is also the most potent of these three greenhouse gases as it is a much better absorber of ; however, the total anthropogenic emissions are about 6 million metric tons of nitrogen as N2O compared to 10 billion metric tons of carbon as CO2.

The main sources of N2O are from the spreading of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers onto and storage and use of . The nitrogen contained in fertilizers and manure is broken down by microbes that live in the soil and released into the atmosphere as N2O.

Dr Davidson believes that N2O emissions can be reduced through better management of fertilizer and manure sources, as well as reducing the developed world's per capita meat consumption to relieve pressure on fertilizer demand and reduce growth in the amount of manure being produced.

In a draft of the IPCC's fifth assessment report, four scenarios have been adopted, known as representative concentration pathways (RCPs), which represent possible pathways of reductions for a number of . Dr Davidson evaluated the scale of changes needed to meet the predicted N2O pathways.

Three of the IPCC's less aggressive scenarios could be met by reducing meat consumption, improving agricultural practices or reducing emissions from industry. The most aggressive scenario, where N2O concentrations stabilise by 2050, can only be met if a 50 per cent reduction, or improvement, for each of the above is achieved.

To make these calculations, Dr Davidson relied on data provided by the Food and Agricultural Organisation, which assumes that the global population will increase to 8.9 billion by 2050 and the daily calorific intake per capita will increase to 3130 kcal.

They also assume that the average meat consumption of each person in the developed world will rise from 78 kg per year in 2002 to 89 kg per year in 2030 and from 28 kg per year in 2002 to 37 kg per year for each person in the developing world.

Assessing the likelihood of reducing in the developed world by 50 per cent, Dr Davidson said: "If you had asked me 30 years ago if smoking would be banned in bars I would have laughed and said that would be impossible in my lifetime, and yet it has come true.

"Are similar changes possible for diet? That will depend not only on education about diet, but also upon prices of meat. Some agricultural economists think that the price of meat is going to go way up, so that per capita consumption will go down, but those are highly uncertain projections."

Explore further: Dog waste contaminates our waterways: A new test could reveal how big the problem is

More information: Representative concentration pathways and mitigation scenarios for nitrous oxide, Eric A Davidson 2012 Environ. Res. Lett. 7 024005. iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/7/2/024005/article

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

New way to measure nitrous oxide emissions

Mar 06, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- An accurate new way to measure a potent greenhouse gas emitted during agricultural production will help countries to better manage their environmental impact, thanks to Queensland University of Technology ...

Greenhouse gases from forest soils

Apr 12, 2011

Reactive nitrogen compounds from agriculture, transport, and industry lead to increased emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) from forests in Europe. Nitrous oxide emission from forest soils is at least twice ...

Nitrous oxide: definitely no laughing matter

Feb 18, 2008

Farmers, food suppliers, policy-makers, business leaders and environmentalists are joining forces to confront the threat of the ‘forgotten greenhouse gas’ by taking part in an influential new forum at the University of ...

Recommended for you

Report IDs 'major weaknesses' at nuclear-arms lab

1 hour ago

One of the nation's premier nuclear weapons laboratories is being called out by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy for "major weaknesses" in the way it packaged contaminated waste before shipping it to ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

slack
1 / 5 (3) Apr 13, 2012
So all we have to do is eat less meat, stop breathing and... what else?
kaasinees
0.3 / 5 (23) Apr 13, 2012
Just stop eating meat and this does a lot of positive things on the environment and food industry.
Not just reducing N2O, methane and CO2 but also less stress on fresh water supply.
And not to forget the tons healthier diet.
deatopmg
1.8 / 5 (5) Apr 13, 2012
Yes, and when the developed world reduces it's consumption of meat by 50% the much larger "less developed" world will likely INCREASE it's meat consumption by a much larger percentage. To stop that we need a "1984" type one world gov't. HMMMM.... GMAFB!
SoylentGrin
3 / 5 (2) Apr 13, 2012
So the more vegetarians there are, the more meat becomes available for others, even if conservation efforts take place.
Stop disparaging the vegans and vegetarians, and encourage others to do it more, people! It will mean more meat for the rest of us!
rwinners
1 / 5 (2) Apr 13, 2012
I wonder how many people are employed in the domestic meat production business.....
Vendicar_Decarian
0.3 / 5 (36) Apr 14, 2012
Well, you can just die.

The rest of us will simply move to an environmentally sustainable lifestyle.

I'm almost there.

Here is an interesting picture from this week's hail storm in Texas.

http://timenewsfe...p;crop=1

"So all we have to do is eat less meat, stop breathing and... what else?" - Slack