Combat makes for gun-shy investors, study says

Apr 10, 2012 By Susan Kelley
Cornell economists Vicki L. Bogan and David R. Just. Photo: Lindsay France

Veterans who have faced combat are more risk-averse when it comes to investing than noncombatants, according to a new Cornell study. As a result, they may struggle to build wealth through long-term investments, the authors say.

Veterans with combat experience were 14 percent to 18 percent less likely than other veterans to invest in such risky assets as mutual funds and stocks, according to the research. There were no differences between the groups, however, in holding safe assets, such as Treasury bonds, certificates of deposit or checking accounts.

The work suggests that unrelated to the financial sector affect one's investment behavior. appear to be overly cautious and all the worse for it financially, since portfolio choices of stock historically have been critical to economic advancement and building wealth.

"A person's often are influenced by many factors that have nothing at all to do with income, wealth, education or the economy. We found that experiencing a trauma or psychological shock can affect your investment behavior -- even when the trauma is not finance or health related," said lead author Vicki L. Bogan, assistant professor of and management at Cornell's Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management. She added that the results suggest "that veterans' combat experiences are important to consider with regard to determining and managing veterans benefits."

The paper, co-authored with Dyson School colleagues David R. Just, associate professor, and Brian Wansink, professor, will appear in a forthcoming issue of Contemporary Economic Policy.

In comparing the investing habits of veterans who said they had faced combat experience with those of veterans who didn't, the researchers controlled for and other individual characteristics that have previously been shown to influence investment behavior. The researchers used a 2000 University of Illinois survey that was conducted for a different purpose. Most of the veterans in the sample served in World War II or the Korean or Vietnam wars.

Once come home, education becomes key, Just added. "With education, the effects of trauma go away -- they will put their money in reasonable risks and obtain normal returns. Without that education they will be at a financial disadvantage the rest of their lives. Strong educational support is one key to recovering from combat."

Explore further: Family financing is anything but foolish

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Mental health affects investment decisions, study shows

Jun 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A paper co-authored by Cornell economist Vicki Bogan suggests that mental health issues or substance abuse in a household may have an effect on investment decisions and management of retirement assets.

Study re-examines Vietnam stress disorder

Aug 18, 2006

A review of an 18-year-old U.S. study of post-traumatic stress disorder suffered by Vietnam veterans found sharply fewer were affected than originally reported.

Recommended for you

Family financing is anything but foolish

12 hours ago

Borrowing money from a family member or friend to start a business is often considered dangerous, both financially and emotionally, however new research conducted by an entrepreneurial expert at the University of Adelaide ...

The economics of age gaps and marriage

Oct 30, 2014

Men and women who are married to spouses of similar ages are smarter, more successful and more attractive compared to couples with larger age gaps, according to a paper from CU Denver Economics Assistant Professor Hani Mansour ...

Do financial experts make better investments?

Oct 28, 2014

Financial experts do not make higher returns on their own investments than untrained investors, according to research by a Michigan State University business scholar.

Lack of A level maths leading to fewer female economists

Oct 28, 2014

A study by the University of Southampton has found there are far fewer women studying economics than men, with women accounting for just 27 per cent of economics students, despite them making up 57 per cent of the undergraduate ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

AWaB
not rated yet Apr 10, 2012
Of course they're more conservative, they value life and all the things they work for more. Most millionaires didn't get that way from being risky. Slow and steady often wins the race.

I'm glad I didn't get my MBA from Cornell. Gamble, gamble, gamble sounds like the tune they sing!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.