Cadillac testing 'Super Cruise' feature for future cars

Apr 23, 2012 by Bob Yirka report

(Phys.org) -- Cadillac is reportedly joining the crowd working on features that it says should reduce car accidents by allowing the car to drive itself under optimal conditions, relieving the driver from fatigue, making road trips safer for the driver and passengers. Currently, Cadillac is already offering features that intercede on the driver’s behalf should the vehicle “sense” a dangerous situation. The new technology, which GM says likely will make it into showrooms by the middle of the decade, should make cars even safer by removing the hazard caused by human fatigue.

Buyers this year can already get most of what is proposing for the future; brake assist, a blind spot alert, automatic rear braking, collision alerts, etc. What’s new will be adding technology that is able to keep the vehicle centered in the lane all by itself. When adding that to what is already offered, GM will be giving motorists the opportunity to buy a that essentially drives itself, at least under certain conditions.

GM readily admits it still hasn’t perfected the technology. A spokesman for the company told reporters that the car will alert the driver if conditions become such that the car can no longer drive itself. That would mean snow, heavy rain, or perhaps even high wind. What’s not clear is how well such a vehicle would respond to such situations as a sudden turn that requires reducing speed beforehand, especially if it occurs just after climbing a hill, making it impossible for sensors to see it coming. In such an instance, the technology would almost certainly have to be able to read a road sign offering a warning, and GM has thus far at least, kept mum on the subject.

This announcement from GM comes after news regarding the achievements of other car makers has dominated the headlines, most notably Google, which has been running several self driving cars for a few years. BMW has also made a splash with its own “highly automated” systems to help the driver avoid accidents by taking more control away from the error prone human component.

Other car makers are working on their own versions of automated driving features as well, which leads to inevitable questions about if and when humans will relinquish control over their vehicles entirely, a notion that many in the auto industry see as the inevitable result of investments in such technology. Cars that drive people around, rather than vice-versa, would, according to most researchers, be far safer than those driven by people, with far fewer accidents, lower insurance rates and less time wasted by drivers who are forced to focus on the road rather than other more productive pursuits.

Explore further: Government wants to make cars talk to each other (Update)

Related Stories

BMW shows hands-free driving on Autobahn (w/ video)

Jan 24, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Move over, Google, or better still, stay off the Autobahn, best not to interfere with the main show, which now stars BMW and its technology feats with self-driving cars. BMW has been drawing ...

Automakers embrace high-tech in safety drive

Jan 11, 2012

Automakers displaying the latest technology at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) are relying on sensors, digital cameras and connectivity in a drive towards a common goal -- eliminating accidents.

Recommended for you

HP sales inch up while profit drops

2 hours ago

Hewlett-Packard on Wednesday reported that its quarterly revenue was nudged up by improved computer sales, but its profit dropped as the veteran technology firm tried to renew its momentum.

Giant tablets aimed at families

3 hours ago

Costing a little more than an iPad but standing more than twice as tall, a new pair of giant tablets wants families to share cozier group experiences with technology.

Restaurants experimenting with pay-in-advance tickets

5 hours ago

With restaurant patrons increasingly jumping on the Internet to make reservations, some high-end eateries here and across the country are adding a new tech wrinkle: having their clientele pay for their meal in advance using ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Musashi
5 / 5 (2) Apr 23, 2012
In "optimal conditions" we don't generally need the car to drive for us... it's the other kind of conditions that kill us.
DontBeBlind
1 / 5 (1) Apr 23, 2012
I do not know about the rest of you. But i know it would take me months if not a year for me to trust a system like this ( or future versions that do 100pct of the driving ). But the thought of being able to leave for a road trip in the middle of the night and sleep the majority of the trip would be very nice.
droid001
not rated yet Apr 23, 2012
computers are more trustworthy than humans
Musashi
5 / 5 (1) Apr 24, 2012
computers are more trustworthy than humans


They're only as trustworthy as the humans that built them.
Eikka
not rated yet Apr 24, 2012
The biggest problem in the system is transitioning from automatic driving to manual driving.

"Dave. Wake up Dave. Please wake up and take the wheel Dave."

That is going to be a problem with cars that drive themselves, because you may have a "driver" on board who doesn't even know how to drive because the last time they actually drove the car was in driving school. The more automated the system is, the less competent the drivers become and the less you can rely on them to handle the situation where the computer can't.