Analytical standards needed for 'reading' Pliocene bones

April 5, 2012
Jackson Njau points to marks on a fossil bone. Credit: Stan Gerbig, Indiana University

Researchers studying human origins should develop standards for determining whether markings on fossil bones were made by stone tools or by biting animals, Indiana University faculty member Jackson Njau writes in an article this week in the journal Science.

Njau, a co-director of field research at paleontological sites in eastern Africa's Olduvai Gorge, notes that the lack of agreement on interpreting such marks is leading to great uncertainty over when early hominids began using tools to kill and butcher animals -- a fundamental step in .

"There's really no solid, standard method of analyzing these bones that is used by all researchers," he said. "And there is no universal guide, nothing that is part of one's training as a student, that tells you reliably how to judge one type of mark from another."

Njau joined the faculty of the IU Bloomington Department of Geological Sciences in the College of Arts and Sciences as an assistant professor in the fall. He also is a research associate with Stone Age Institute in Bloomington and the Center for Research into the Anthropological Foundations of Technology at IU. He is former principal curator of the National in Arusha, Tanzania.

His Science Perspectives article, published in the April 6 issue and titled "Reading Pliocene Bones," contends that the "way forward" is through further experimentation, integration of different disciplines to better understand the fossil record, and blind testing of bone samples by researchers and students.

He proposes creating a comprehensive collection of samples, developed from experiments on various forms of modification, and making it available to researchers and students through the sharing of samples and the posting of photographs and information online.

Njau points out that the lack of standard criteria has produced estimates of the earliest use of that vary by nearly 1 million years. The consensus is that the earliest evidence of tools associated with butchered bones come from Gona, Ethiopia, 2.6 million years ago, discoveries published by Sileshi Semaw of the Stone Age Institute and others. But a 2010 paper argued that 3.4-million-year-old from Dikika, Ethiopia, showed tool markings, an interpretation that has been challenged by other research groups.

Generally used criteria describe tool marks as V-shaped cuts containing microscopic striations. Percussion marks made by stone hammers are said to consist of pits and grooves, also with micro-striations. But Njau has shown through experiments that the sharp teeth of crocodiles can inflict a range of bite marks closely mimicking tool marks.

This suggests that researchers need to rely on more than the appearance of Pliocene and early Pleistocene bones to determine whether they were marked by stone tools, he says. It's also important to consider the quality of the samples and the context in which they were found. For example, how many bones show what appear to be tool marks? Have stone tools been found in the same area and from the same time? Were crocodiles or other animals present that could have caused the marks?

Explore further: Crocs and fish key to human evolution

Related Stories

Crocs and fish key to human evolution

June 1, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of scientists now know what may have helped fuel the evolution of the human brain two million years ago. Archeologists working in Kenya unearthed evidence that our human ancestors ate a wide variety ...

Anthropologist challenges Lucy’s butchery tool use

November 16, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- An anthropologist in Spain has challenged recent evidence the ancient hominin species Australopithecus afarensis, represented by "Lucy," used sharp stones to butcher animals for meat some 800,000 years before ...

Handier than Homo habilis?

September 8, 2011

The versatile hand of Australopithecus sediba makes a better candidate for an early tool-making hominin than the hand of Homo habilis.

Recommended for you

Paleontologists discover major T. rex fossil (Update)

August 18, 2016

Paleontologists with the Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture and the University of Washington have discovered a Tyrannosaurus rex, including a very complete skull. The find, which paleontologists estimate to be about ...

An inflexible diet led to the disappearance of the cave bear

August 23, 2016

Senckenberg scientists have studied the feeding habits of the extinct cave bear. Based on the isotope composition in the collagen of the bears' bones, they were able to show that the large mammals subsisted on a purely vegan ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

sjrenfroe
not rated yet Apr 05, 2012
I'll bet if he contacts some coroners or medical examiners, they would be able to give him a wealth of information.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.