Virginia high court rules in favor of climate scientist

Mar 02, 2012 by Kerry Sheridan
Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli speaks in Washington, DC in February 2012. The supreme court of Virginia on Friday ruled in favor of a prominent climate scientist, blocking a two-year attempt by state officials to get access to his university emails and grant materials.

The supreme court of Virginia on Friday ruled in favor of a prominent climate scientist, blocking a two-year bid by state officials to get access to his university emails and grant materials.

The case was brought by state attorney general Ken Cuccinelli, a skeptic of global warming, against the University of Virginia where well known Michael Mann taught from 1999 to 2005.

Cuccinelli had tried to obtain Mann's communications relating to grants he received to conduct research, alleging there may have been data manipulated to show a rise in linked to fossil fuel use.

The attorney general sought the information -- which would have included research drafts, and emails -- via what is known as a "civil investigative demand" under the state's Fraud Against Taxpayers Act.

But the Virginia supreme court came down on the university's side, saying Cuccinelli's bid had no legal standing because the university was neither a "person" nor a "corporation" under the act and therefore could not be probed.

Also, Cuccinelli "did not sufficiently state what the attorney general suspected Dr. Mann did that was 'false or fraudulent,'" the ruling said.

The Union of Concerned Scientists hailed the ruling and said Cuccinelli was part of a "small but vocal minority in a pointless and costly investigation."

"We applaud the high court for reaffirming that Mr Cuccinelli didn't have a legal leg to stand on in his pursuit of Mann's and other scientists' private correspondence," said Michael Halpern, program manager for the UCS scientific integrity program.

"The university should be commended for its courage in standing up to the attorney general to ensure Virginia will remain a safe place for scientific research, even when elected officials don't like the results."

A lower circuit court judge had set aside Cuccinelli's request in 2010, ruling the had failed to provide evidence of wrongdoing by Mann or his colleagues.

Mann, who is now director of Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Center, was among the scientists whose emails were leaked in the 2009 "Climategate" scandal after the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit's servers were hacked.

"I'm pleased that this particular episode is over," Mann said in a statement.

"It's sad, though, that so much money and resources had to be wasted on Cuccinelli's witch hunt against me and the University of Virginia, when it could have been invested, for example, in measures to protect Virginia's coast line from the damaging effects of sea level rise it is already seeing."

Mann also noted that a National Science Foundation investigation last year found no evidence of wrongdoing and no basis to the allegations against him by Cuccinelli and other climate change skeptics.

Cuccinelli said he would abandon the sole remaining case that is still pending in the matter, in keeping with the high court's decision.

"From the beginning, we have said that we were simply trying to review documents that are unquestionably state property to determine whether or not fraud had been committed," Cuccinelli said in a statement.

"Today, the court effectively held that state agencies do not have to provide state-owned property to state investigators looking into potential fraud involving government funds."

Explore further: Color and texture matter most when it comes to tomatoes

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Judge in Va. strikes down federal health care law

Dec 13, 2010

(AP) -- A federal judge declared the foundation of President Barack Obama's health care law unconstitutional Monday, ruling that the government cannot require Americans to purchase insurance. The case is ...

Ruling allows poultry pollution evidence

Mar 24, 2006

A judge in Oklahoma has ruled that state officials may collect evidence for a lawsuit in which they allege poultry farms are polluting state watersheds.

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Recommended for you

Color and texture matter most when it comes to tomatoes

Oct 21, 2014

A new study in the Journal of Food Science, published by the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT), evaluated consumers' choice in fresh tomato selection and revealed which characteristics make the red fruit most appealing.

How the lotus got its own administration

Oct 21, 2014

Actually the lotus is a very ordinary plant. Nevertheless, during the Qing dynasty (1644-1911) a complex bureaucratic structure was built up around this plant. The lotus was part of the Imperial Household, ...

What labels on textiles can tell us about society

Oct 21, 2014

Throughout Chinese history, dynastic states used labels on textiles to spread information on the maker, the commissioner, the owner or the date and site of production. Silks produced in state-owned manufacture ...

US company sells out of Ebola toys

Oct 17, 2014

They might look tasteless, but satisfied customers dub them cute and adorable. Ebola-themed toys have proved such a hit that one US-based company has sold out.

User comments : 0