The tick-tock of the optical clock

Mar 29, 2012
An ion trap like this one is used to study optical frequency standards under low magnetic conditions

(PhysOrg.com) -- UK's National Physical Laboratory time scientists have made an accurate measurement of the highly forbidden octupole transition frequency in an ytterbium ion, which could be used as the basis for the next generation of optical atomic clocks.

Ytterbium (Yb) is a metallic element that could be used in ultra-high accuracy optical clocks. that use the of caesium atoms are currently the gold standard when it comes to timekeeping, with NPL's caesium fountain clock being the UK's primary standard and currently the most accurate system of its kind in the world. But clocks that rely on , such as those based on that of ytterbium, have the potential to surpass microwave atomic clocks, with up to 100 times better stability and accuracy.

In research at NPL, published in the , a measurement of the frequency of a transition of an ytterbium ion, known as an octupole transition, is presented with a level of uncertainty of one part in 1015. This represents an improvement by a factor of 20 on the previous measurement and agrees with a similar measurement made by the German National Measurement Institute, PTB, and published soon after the NPL paper, with an uncertainty of 0.8 parts in 1015. In fact, the results demonstrate the best international agreement between trapped ion optical frequency standards to date.

The measurement of the frequency is important because in simplistic terms it is this frequency that determines the rate at which the atomic clock 'ticks'. In general, the faster the rate of ticking, the more precisely time intervals can be measured. The definition of the second comes from the time taken for 9,192,631,770 such ticks in a caesium atom. The recent research at NPL measured that during one second, the ytterbium ion clock underwent 642,121,496,772,646.22(67) oscillations, corresponding to a tick rate nearly five orders of magnitude higher than in caesium.

Various upgrades to the experimental equipment have enabled this to be made. Most significantly, an improved diode-based probe laser has been implemented that allows the clock to operate for extended periods of time at the required . It is thought that the uncertainty can be further reduced by decreasing the impact of any drift in the magnetic field. One way of doing this would be to introduce a magnetic shield made from mu-metal - a nickel-iron alloy famed for its high magnetic permeability - around the ion trap.

By introducing the magnetic shielding and making several other identified improvements, the uncertainty for the ytterbium standard could be further reduced to below the level of one part in 1017. At this level of uncertainty, the ion standard would be a strong candidate for a future redefinition of the SI-second, replacing the caesium based definition that we use today.

Explore further: Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze

More information: S A King, et al, P E G Baird and P Gill, New J. Phys. 14, 013045 (2012)

N. Huntemann, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 090801 (2012)

Provided by National Physical Laboratory

3.8 /5 (10 votes)

Related Stories

New 'pendulum' for the ytterbium clock

Mar 09, 2012

The faster a clock ticks, the more precise it can be. Due to the fact that lightwaves vibrate faster than microwaves, optical clocks can be more precise than the caesium atomic clocks which presently determine ...

New Research Promises Better Atomic Clocks

Apr 22, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- The most accurate timekeepers in the world are atomic clocks, which tell time based on the absorption of a very specific and unchanging microwave frequency, which induces electrons in an atom to “jump” ...

Atomic fountain clocks are becoming still more stable

Mar 18, 2009

They are at present the most accurate clocks in the world: Caesium fountain clocks furnish the second accurate to 15 places after the decimal point. Until they reach this accuracy, caesium fountain clocks, however, need a ...

When atoms collide

Jun 04, 2007

Scientists at the UK’s National Physical Laboratory (NPL) have proposed a new way to determine accurate time faster.

Recommended for you

Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze

9 hours ago

(Phys.org) —Using a laser, the St Andrews scientists can now carry out detailed analysis of a spirit sample no bigger than a teardrop and can even confirm whether it is toxic or not. It's hoped the testing ...

Bringing life into focus

May 17, 2013

Spinning-disk confocal microscopy is an optical imaging technique that can be used to generate detailed three-dimensional fluorescence images of living cells and their contents. Although a powerful tool for ...

World's smallest droplet

May 17, 2013

(Phys.org) —Physicists may have created the smallest drops of liquid ever made in the lab. That possibility has been raised by the results of a recent experiment conducted by Vanderbilt physicist Julia Velkovska and her ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
not rated yet Mar 29, 2012
By introducing the magnetic shielding and making several other identified improvements, the uncertainty for the ytterbium standard could be further reduced to below the level of one part in 1017.

That should probably read "one part in 10 to the power of 17".
Turritopsis
not rated yet Mar 29, 2012
By introducing the magnetic shielding and making several other identified improvements, the uncertainty for the ytterbium standard could be further reduced to below the level of one part in 1017.

That should probably read "one part in 10 to the power of 17".


You're correct, the sentence states that precision can be furthered (meaning from state of imprecision of 1 for every 10^15 occurrences). This means precision goes up 1 miss in greater than 10^15. (eg. 1 miss in 10^16, or 1 in 10^17). Less precise would be 1 miss in 10^14, or 10^13, or 1017 (which is 1.017 * 10^3).

Please delete comment if article is corrected.
Turritopsis
not rated yet Mar 29, 2012
Uncertainty is now at 1 part in 10^17, not 1 in 10^15.

More news stories

Lab sets a new record for creating heralded photons

(Phys.org) —Entanglement, by general consensus of physicists, is the weirdest part of quantum science. To say that two particles, A and B, are entangled means that they are actually two parts of an inseparable ...

Breakthrough calls time on bootleg booze

(Phys.org) —Using a laser, the St Andrews scientists can now carry out detailed analysis of a spirit sample no bigger than a teardrop and can even confirm whether it is toxic or not. It's hoped the testing ...

Competition in the quantum world

Innsbruck physicists led by Rainer Blatt and Peter Zoller experimentally gained a deep insight into the nature of quantum mechanical phase transitions. They are the first scientists that simulated the competition ...

New principle may help explain why nature is quantum

Like small children, scientists are always asking the question 'why?'. One question they've yet to answer is why nature picked quantum physics, in all its weird glory, as a sensible way to behave. Researchers ...

Practice makes perfect? Not so much

Turns out, that old "practice makes perfect" adage may be overblown. New research led by Michigan State University's Zach Hambrick finds that a copious amount of practice is not enough to explain why people ...