Can one simple strategy help consumers say 'no' to temptation?

Mar 15, 2012

When facing temptation, can a simple change of language make a difference? According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, consumers who respond to temptation with the words "I don't" versus "I can't" are more able to resist.

"Whether it's buffalo wings at a tailgate or heaping plates of calories at the Thanksgiving day that is your downfall, help is merely a couple of words away," write authors Vanessa M. Patrick (University of Houston) and Henrik Hagtvedt (Boston College).

In four studies the authors examined the difference between framing a refusal with the words "I don't" vs. "I can't." "This insight is based on the notion that saying "I can't" to inherently signals deprivation and the loss from giving up something desirable," the authors write. "For instance, when faced with a tempting slice of , one's spontaneous response, 'I can't eat pumpkin pie' signals deprivation. Saying 'I don't eat pumpkin pie' is more effective." This approach signals to oneself (and others) a sense of determination and , which makes the refusal strategy more effective.

In one study, the authors studied 30 women for 10 days. The women were divided up into three different refusal strategies. One group was assigned the "don't" strategy, another was given the "can't" strategy, and a third group was given a generic "just-say-no" strategy. A daily email reminded the participants to use the strategies and to report instances when they worked and when they didn't.

The "I don't" strategy increased participants' feelings of , control, and self-awareness; and it resulted in positive behavioral change. One participant reported "a renewed dedication to shedding those extra pounds….I bought a used folding bicycle this weekend that I can keep in my office and use to ride across campus." Saying "I don't" also led to increased longevity; participants reported using it long after the study was completed.

"What's great about this research is that it suggests a strategy that is simple, straightforward, and easy to implement. And most importantly…it works!" the authors conclude.

Explore further: Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

More information: Vanessa M. Patrick and Henrik Hagtvedt. "'I Don't' versus 'I Can't': When Empowered Refusal Motivates Goal-Directed Behavior." Journal of Consumer Research: August 2012.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Don't throw the candy out: Temptation leads to moderation

Sep 15, 2008

Banishing tempting goodies may not be the best way to keep from eating them. Tempting foods can actually increase willpower, according to new research in the Journal of Consumer Research. Although it seems counterintuitive, consum ...

Learning curve: Tricks to resist temptation

Mar 31, 2009

Here's good news for dieters who face food challenges in the break room every day: A new study in the Journal of Consumer Research shows that our resistance gets a boost after we've just been exposed to similar temptations.

Some types of arousal can lead to unhealthy choices

Jun 21, 2010

You might want to avoid food shopping right after a heavy workout or drinking after an intense day of high-powered negotiations, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

Belief in god cuts two ways, study finds

Oct 27, 2011

Being reminded of the concept of God can decrease people's motivation to pursue personal goals but can help them resist temptation, according to new research published by the American Psychological Association.

Recommended for you

Election surprises tend to erode trust in government

8 hours ago

When asked who is going to win an election, people tend to predict their own candidate will come out on top. When that doesn't happen, according to a new study from the University of Georgia, these "surprised losers" often ...

Awarded a Pell Grant? Better double-check

Jul 23, 2014

(AP)—Potentially tens of thousands of students awarded a Pell Grant or other need-based federal aid for the coming school year could find it taken away because of a mistake in filling out the form.

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

Jul 23, 2014

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tzaftisha
not rated yet Mar 21, 2012
this strategy of saying 'i don't eat/drink x' is exemplified by people who keep kosher or are vegans/vegetarians.
people who keep kosher they say 'i don't eat 'traif/pork/shellfish etc'.
while vegetarians/vegans will say 'i don't eat meat/fish/dairy/eggs etc' they don't say 'they can't eat x' or that they don't like it.. just that 'they don't eat' the item in question. even small children brought up in this way can exercise this degree of self-control when faced with foods that aren't kosher or aren't vegan/vegetarian etc.
so the proof of the pudding is to say 'i don't eat desserts'