Protein complex affects cells' ability to move, respond to external cues

Mar 01, 2012

In a paper published today in the journal, Cell, a team from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has explained for the first time how a long-studied protein complex affects cell migration and how external cues affect cell's ability to migrate.

Cell migration is one of life's basic processes, from development in the womb to , to learning and , wound healing and – when it goes wrong – in cancer.

Jim Bear, PhD, principal investigator on the study, says, "The ARP 2/3 is – evolutionarily speaking – very old, but very little is known about what happens to when it is eliminated. It was thought previously that cells could simply not survive without it. Thanks to Norman Sharpless' lab here at UNC, we were able to find a cell line where the protein can be eliminated without loss of viability in order to see what happens to cells."

The result, says Bear, was fascinating. With the ARP 2/3 protein complex intact, cells migrate by forming a fan-shaped structure, called a lamellipodia, at the leading edge. The team found that eliminating this protein complex caused cells to switch to making finger-shaped protrusions instead – called filopodia. The cells with "fingers" on the leading edge move much more slowly than those with "fans".

Bear, who is an associate professor of cell and developmental biology and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Early Career Scientist, has focused his laboratory's work around how cell movement responds to environmental cues. Once his team figured out that loss of ARP 2/3 could change cells actual structure and movement, they went on to look at how those changes affected the ability of cells to respond to .

"Cells sense a wide variety of soluble chemical cues through 'chemotaxis' – a process that is the basis behind many drugs that target cell behavior. They also respond to attached cues from the surface that they are crawling upon – a much less well understood process called haptotaxis," says Bear, who is also a member of UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center.

So Bear's team set out to test the widely held idea that the cells require lamellipodia "fans" to respond to chemotactic cues. They found that cells with lamellipodia "fans" and filopodia "fingers" (with and without the ARP 2/3 protein complex) respond to chemotaxic cues indistinguishably, although they move faster with lamellipodia.

"The really interesting finding came when we looked at how each type of cell responds to hapotactic cues," says Bear. The team developed a new laboratory technique that uses a microfluidic device to lay down a gradient of a surface molecules (or substrate) for the cells to 'crawl' across in a way that could be measured in the lab. They could then look at whether the cells could 'sense' a gradient in the matrix. With the ARP 2/3 protein complex, the cells with "fans" on the leading edge followed the gradient of the surface proteins in an orderly, predictable faction. Without it, the cells with "fingers" moved randomly.

"This experiment – which was possible only with the help of many diverse UNC colleagues ranging from genetics to biomedical engineering – finally tells us what lamellipodia and the ARP 2/3 protein complex do: help the cell respond to clues from the extracellular environment. It has long been assumed that the was important for chemotaxis, but that is not the case."

The study opens the way for a new frontier of investigation in the area of hapotaxis, or behavioral clues that cells get from the extracellular matrix. Also, says Bear, "We don't understand chemotaxis as well as we thought. What are the forces in the cell that respond to soluble cues?"

Both areas of investigation could be important for future breakthroughs in areas requiring precisely controlled cell migratory behavior including and tissue repair, cancer and cardiovascular disease.

Explore further: Compound from soil microbe inhibits biofilm formation

Related Stories

Understanding the migration of cancer cells

Jun 23, 2008

[B]Activity of regulatory proteins for the growth of filopodia and lamelopodia clarified[/B] Lamellipodia are veil-shaped protrusions of the plasma membrane, that can turn into upward-curled ruffles if they fail to adhere to ...

The forces of attraction: How cells change direction

Jul 05, 2011

Many cell types in higher organisms are capable of implementing directed motion in response to the presence of certain chemical attractants in their vicinity. A team led by Dr. Doris Heinrich of the Faculty of Physics and ...

Enzyme can steer cells or possibly stop them in their tracks

Mar 18, 2011

Researchers at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University have discovered that members of an enzyme family found in humans and throughout the plant and animal kingdoms play a crucial role in regulating cell ...

Engineering bacterial cells

Feb 09, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Two teams of Oxford University researchers led by Professors Judith Armitage and David Stuart have made the first steps towards being able to engineer a bacterial cell that can sense and respond to novel ...

Recommended for you

Compound from soil microbe inhibits biofilm formation

17 hours ago

Researchers have shown that a known antibiotic and antifungal compound produced by a soil microbe can inhibit another species of microbe from forming biofilms—microbial mats that frequently are medically harmful—without ...

Researcher among best in protein modeling contests

20 hours ago

A Purdue University researcher ranks among the best in the world in bioinformatics competitions to predict protein structure, docking and function, making him a triple threat in the world of protein modeling.

Survey of salmonella species in Staten Island Zoo's snakes

21 hours ago

For humans, Salmonella is always bad news. The bacterial pathogen causes paratyphoid fever, gastroenteritis and typhoid. But for snakes, the bacteria aren't always bad news. Certain species of Salmonella are a natural part ...

A long-standing mystery in membrane traffic solved

Mar 27, 2015

In 2013, James E. Rothman, Randy W. Schekman, and Thomas C. Südhof won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discoveries of molecular machineries for vesicle trafficking, a major transport ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.