Panel backs sharing studies of lab-made bird flu

Mar 30, 2012 By MALCOLM RITTER , AP Science Writer

(AP) -- The U.S. government's biosecurity advisers said Friday they support publishing research studies showing how scientists made new easy-to-spread forms of bird flu because the studies, now revised, don't reveal details bioterrorists could use.

The decision could end a debate that began in December when the government took the unprecedented step of asking the scientists not to publicize all the details of their work.

The research, by two scientific teams - one in Wisconsin, the other in The Netherlands - was funded by the U.S. It was an effort to learn more about the potential threat from in Asia. The virus so far doesn't spread easily among people. But the new lab-made viruses spread easily among , suggesting they would also spread among humans.

Last year, after reviewing earlier versions of the papers, the National Science Advisory Board for said publishing full details would be too risky. The federal government agreed.

Scientists around the world debated the matter. Many argued that full publication would help scientists track dangerous in natural bird , and test vaccines and treatments.

On Friday, board members, meeting in Washington, announced they are satisfied with the revised papers. It was not clear what changes were made. The panel's advice now goes to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for a decision.

The board unanimously supported publication of one study, led by Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin. By majority vote it supported publication of the key parts of a second study, from Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Editors of the journals Science and Nature, which plan to publish the works, said they were pleased by the recommendation. "Subject to any outstanding regulatory and legal issues, we intend to proceed with publication as soon as possible," said Philip Campbell, editor-in-chief of Nature.

The man-made viruses are locked in high-security labs. Publication in scientific journals is how scientists share their work so that their colleagues can build on it, perhaps finding ways to better monitor and thwart bird in the wild, for example.

University of Pennsylvania bioethics professor Art Caplan said the board's recommendation makes sense, primarily because the information in the studies is already being shared among scientists.

"The details of this paper are already out, these two papers. The horse is out of the barn and trying to yank it back doesn't make much sense," Caplan said.

Natural bird flu has infected people through close contact with animals, and it doesn't easily spread from person to person. Scientists fear that a highly transmissible bird flu could cause a lethal pandemic.

The researchers say the transmissible germs they created did not actually kill the lab animals.

The bird flu virus, called H5N1, has spread mostly through poultry in Asia for the past decade. It has killed more than 300 people since 2003, mostly in Asia.

Explore further: Sniffing out a partner at a London pheromone party

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Details of lab-made bird flu won't be revealed (Update)

Dec 20, 2011

The U.S. government paid scientists to figure out how the deadly bird flu virus might mutate to become a bigger threat to people - and two labs succeeded in creating new strains that are easier to spread.

US journal editor backs change to bird flu policy

Feb 17, 2012

The editor of the US journal Science said Friday he supports the decision of bird flu experts in Geneva to make public controversial research about a mutant form of the H5N1 virus. ...

Killer flu virus threat over-hyped: Dutch scientist

Dec 21, 2011

A top Dutch scientist heading a team which created a mutant killer flu virus Wednesday said the threat to global biosecurity is being overplayed, even if full research results are published.

Scientists debate bird flu studies at WHO

Feb 16, 2012

Scientists met behind closed doors in Geneva Thursday to discuss whether controversial research on a mutant form of bird flu capable of being spread among humans can be made public.

Divides emerge in US, world response to mutant flu

Feb 29, 2012

A divide has emerged between the United States and the rest of the world on whether to publish or keep secret the details of an engineered mutant bird flu virus that can pass in the air between animals, health experts said ...

Recommended for you

How to win a Tour de France sprint

Jul 22, 2014

The final dash to the line in a Tour de France sprint finish may appear to the bystander to be a mess of bodies trying to cram into the width of a road, but there is a high degree of strategy involved. It ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

kochevnik
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 30, 2012
Major step forward in reducing earth's population below the four billion watermark.
TS1
1 / 5 (2) Mar 30, 2012
hmm ok so when were these "easy-to-spread forms of bird flu" made? After the fall 2005 publication of the 1918 influenza genome at GenBank? So the accusations of the flu virus in the subsequent outbreaks being manmade were perhaps correct?
epsi00
1 / 5 (1) Mar 31, 2012
Major step forward in reducing earth's population below the four billion watermark.


We don't need a virus for that, we are doing a fine job without it. Nature, when the time comes, will renormalize everything and we will become a has-been species like so many before us.
dogbert
1 / 5 (3) Mar 31, 2012
Deliberately creating a more transmissible strain of a deadly virus does not fit into the definition of sane activity.

University of Pennsylvania bioethics professor Art Caplan said the board's recommendation makes sense, primarily because the information in the studies is already being shared among scientists.


Passing that information around indiscriminately also lacks sanity.

The irresponsibility of science is almost a byword in the general media (e.g.: mad scientist), and such activities as this lend credence to that perception.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (3) Apr 02, 2012
Just what we need - another lethal and in this case much, much cheaper terrorist weapon. It'll soon be in the hands of the wrong kind of people. That's guaranteed.
My most cynical guess is that the U.S government dept. was looking at the bio-weapons potential of the virus. That's just my knee-jerk reaction.
sethxdeath
5 / 5 (1) Apr 03, 2012
Kevin, when are your thoughts and posts NOT knee-jerk reactions?