Ocean iron affects biological productivity: study

Mar 13, 2012
ocean

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of researchers has just published a new paper, lead authored by Boston University Professor of Earth Sciences Richard W. Murray, that provides compelling evidence from marine sediment that supports the theory that iron in the Earth’s oceans has a direct impact on biological productivity, potentially affecting the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and, in turn, atmospheric temperature. These findings have been published in the March 11, 2012 online edition of the journal Nature Geoscience.

The oceans are the world's largest inventory of reactive carbon. Over time, oceanic carbon exchanges with the atmospheric reservoir of carbon in the form of (CO2). Much of the carbon present in the surface oceans is taken up by the growth of marine plants (primarily by phytoplankton) through photosynthesis. Consequently, marine is recognized as a factor in determining the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide at various times in the Earth’s history.

The magnitude of ocean biological productivity depends on the availability of key nutrients, including nitrogen, phosphorous and metals such as . In fact, previous research has established that biological productivity in the equatorial Pacific and the oceans around Antarctica is limited by the amount of iron, a micro-nutrient, more than by the better-known 'major' nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus.

The link between iron and marine biological productivity first gained attention more than twenty years ago with the publication of a controversial paper by the late John Martin, an oceanographer at the at the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (California State University). Martin’s “Iron Hypothesis” postulates that biological productivity could be stimulated by increasing the amount of iron in the ocean, which in turn would draw down atmospheric carbon dioxide. He further argued that this process contributed to ancient ice ages: When the earth was drier and therefore dustier, more iron was deposited in the oceans, thus stimulating biological productivity, reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide and cooling the earth (the inverse of global warming). This could result in prolonged glacial periods. By closely examining the sedimentary record, Murray and his colleagues have established a clear relationship between plant plankton (diatoms) and the input of iron, exactly as Martin predicted.

Many researchers since Martin have established that the availability of iron in the modern ocean determines the amount of biological production in high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll regions and may be important in lower-nutrient settings as well. By examining the paleo-oceanographic record of iron input and the deposition of diatoms, Murray and his colleagues found that the ancient system is highly consistent with what occurs in the oceans today.

The new publication provides an important sedimentary record from the high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll region of the equatorial Pacific Ocean, and shows strong links between iron input and the export and burial of biogenic silica (opal produced from diatoms) over the past million years. Although the direct relationship to climate remains unclear, data collected by the team demonstrate that iron accumulation is more closely tied to the accumulation of opal than any other biogenic component, and that high iron input closely correlates with substantially increased opal sedimentation. The strong links between iron and opal accumulation in the past are in agreement with the modern biogeochemical behavior of iron and silica, and the response of the diatom community to their mutual availability, all of which supports Martin’s postulate of a biological response to iron delivery over long timescales.

Explore further: NASA provides double vision on Typhoon Matmo

More information: DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1422

Provided by Boston University

4.8 /5 (4 votes)

Related Stories

Ocean iron and CO2 interaction studied

Apr 26, 2007

A French study suggested that iron supply changes from deep water to the ocean's surface might have a greater effect on atmospheric CO2 than thought.

Volcano fuels massive phytoplankton bloom

Oct 06, 2010

Advocates for seeding regions of the ocean with iron to combat global warming should be interested in a new study published today in Geophysical Research Letters.

Iron isotopes as a tool in oceanography

Jul 31, 2009

New research involving scientists from the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton (NOCS) highlights the potential utility of iron isotopes for addressing important questions in ocean science. The findings are published ...

Recommended for you

Jeju Island is a live volcano, study reveals

15 hours ago

In Jeju, a place emerging as a world-famous vacation spot with natural tourism resources, a recent study revealed a volcanic eruption occurred on the island. The Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ...

Has Antarctic sea ice expansion been overestimated?

15 hours ago

New research suggests that Antarctic sea ice may not be expanding as fast as previously thought. A team of scientists say much of the increase measured for Southern Hemisphere sea ice could be due to a processing ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gregor1
3.3 / 5 (3) Mar 13, 2012
This looks like good news. Does it mean if we want more fish all we have to do is scoop up megatons of red dust from Western Australia and spray it on the ocean? Seems like a great way to feed people.
RealScience
5 / 5 (1) Mar 13, 2012
@gregor1 - basically, yes.
But there are a lot of details to work out. Too much iron to fast and the result can be red tides and other toxic slime rather than fish. And the decomposing slime can even consume enough oxygen to kill existing fish.

If the right rate of addition of dust in the right places can be worked out, then the oceanic food supply could be multiplied several fold. And turning CO2 into both food and sediment would help reduce global warming and ocean acidification as well.
gregor1
1 / 5 (1) Mar 13, 2012
thanks. That sounds great. There must be huge amounts of iron blowing into the sea of Western Australia. I wonder What's happening there?
plaasjaapie
1 / 5 (1) Mar 14, 2012
We've known about this approach for over twenty years. Moss Landing is about 25 miles from where I live. You can grow fish and sequester carbon dioxide at a tremendous rate and even drop the level in the atmosphere, if you wish.

We've know this for twenty years yet the proponents of AGW have never promoted it. That tells me that their agenda is political, not environmental.
RitchieGuy
1 / 5 (2) Mar 14, 2012
Some information here:

http://www.volcan...011.html
Sanescience
not rated yet Mar 14, 2012
Much of the carbon present in the surface oceans is taken up by the growth of marine plants (primarily by phytoplankton) through photosynthesis. Consequently, marine biological productivity is recognized as a factor in determining the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide at various times in the Earths history.


I would be interested in what the curve for PH of the ocean is if plants are increasing "productivity" when the atmosphere levels increase.
Birger
not rated yet Mar 14, 2012
The devil is in the details. Previous test "seeding" of the ocean with iron has not worked out.
This is still in the basic research stage. Maybe the approach will be practical, maybe not.
I do not know how algae react to changes in the PH, but since they have evolved at the present level, my bet would be that any changes are for the worse.