Millennium Development Goals progress reports overestimate access to safe water

Mar 01, 2012

The researchers show that the current methods oversimplify the measure by not accounting for water quality; the key measure of safety. In four of the five developing countries studied, the reduction in reported progress would be substantial. It is likely that MDG safe-water progress in other developing countries is similarly overstated.

The study was led by the University of Bristol's and Health Research Centre in the Department of Civil Engineering and involved with researchers at the Universities of Southampton, Surrey and . The aim was to determine how data on water source quality affect assessment of progress towards the MDG on access to safe .

The (WHO) and Children's Fund () are responsible for monitoring progress towards the MDG target through their Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP). The current monitoring approach uses a classification of water source type – improved or unimproved – as the indicator of water safety. In effect, all improved sources such as piped supplies, protected wells and boreholes are considered to be safe. This pragmatic approach was developed in the absence of water quality monitoring data suitable for such a global monitoring programme.

In 2004-5, WHO and UNICEF undertook a series of surveys in five countries to improve understanding of the quality of water from different source types. The surveys, called the Rapid Assessment of Drinking Water Quality (RADWQ), found that many of the 'improved' source types considered as safe often tested positive for contaminants, both microbial and chemical.

The research team used the data from these surveys to adjust estimates of the proportion of the population with access to safe drinking water, instead of basing the estimates on the type of water source alone. The researchers found taking the data on water source quality into account substantially reduced the most recently reported, 2008, estimates of the population with access to safe drinking-water in four of the five study countries.

Stephen Gundry, Professor of Environmental Engineering, who led the study, said: "The MDG indicator, access to an improved water source, can lead to substantial overestimates of the population with access to safe drinking water and, consequently, also overestimates the progress made towards the 2015 MDG target.

"As water quality data internationally were limited and unreliable, the Joint Monitoring Programme of WHO/UNICEF chose to base its estimates on access to an improved source. The RADWQ study showed that many such improved sources are in fact unsafe and thus this assumption causes an overstatement in progress towards the MDG target."

Taking account of data on water source quality resulted in substantially lower estimates of the percentage of the population with access to safe drinking water in 2008 in four of the five study countries: the absolute reduction was 11 per cent in Ethiopia, 16 per cent in Nicaragua, 15 per cent in Nigeria and seven per cent in Tajikistan. The adjustment increased the most recent estimate of the number of people without access to safe drinking water in Ethiopia and Nigeria, the two most populous countries, by 8.9 and 22 million, respectively. There was only a slight reduction in Jordan. Microbial contamination was more common than chemical contamination and was the principal cause of the reductions.

Although we have not directly extrapolated our results to a global scale, the study suggests that the method used by the Joint Monitoring Programme to monitor progress towards MDG Target 7c, is likely to lead to substantial overestimation of the number of safe sources compared with criteria that include water quality. The Joint Monitoring Programme recently addressed this issue in their report 'Drinking Water: Equity, safety and sustainability' which draws similar conclusions about the impact of water quality on reported estimates.

The researchers recommend that data on water quality currently available from national monitoring programmes could be used to adjust MDG progress for those countries not included in the RADWQ project. They also recommend future international targets should consider including the testing of to assess the safety of supplies.

Explore further: Atmospheric mercury review raises concerns of environmental impact

More information: Accounting for water quality in monitoring access to safe drinking-water as part of the Millennium Development Goals: lessons from five countries, Rob ES Bain, Stephen W Gundry, Jim A Wright, Hong Yang, Steve Pedley and Jamie K Bartram, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, published online 20 January 2012.

A copy of the paper is available to download from the following URL: fluff.bris.ac.uk/fluff/u1/injf… Imj46OduIzUVtslwgRY/

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Safe water? Lessons from Kazakhstan

Apr 29, 2008

Despite significant efforts to improve access to safe water and sanitation, a new report co-authored by an expert at The University of Nottingham, argues that much more needs to be done.

Recommended for you

New solutions needed to recycle fracking water

20 hours ago

Rice University scientists have produced a detailed analysis of water produced by hydraulic fracturing (aka fracking) of three gas reservoirs and suggested environmentally friendly remedies are needed to ...

User comments : 0