Researchers suggest magnetic anomalies on the Moon are the result of asteroid collision

Mar 08, 2012
The Moon. Credit: NASA

In the nearly five decades since the first lunar surveys were conducted as part of NASA's Apollo program, scientists have advanced a number of increasingly complex theories to explain the vast swaths of highly magnetic material that had been found in the some parts of the Moon's crust.

But now a team of researchers from Harvard, MIT and the Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, have proposed a surprisingly simple explanation for the unusual findings – the magnetic anomalies are remnants of a massive asteroid collision. As described in a paper published March 9 in Science, the researchers believe an asteroid slammed into the approximately 4 billion years ago, leaving behind an enormous crater and iron-rich, highly magnetic rock.

While there is evidence that the Moon once generated its own magnetic field, there is little to suggest it was strong enough to account for the anomalies seen in earlier surveys, Sarah Stewart-Mukhopadhyay, the John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Natural Sciences, and one of three co-authors of the paper, said. To explain the findings, then, researchers turned to a number of elaborate scenarios.

"The conundrum has always been that the magnetism we see on the Moon is not correlated with any surface geology," she said. "The theory that has been most commonly cited to explain it is an 'impact-induced field,' in which an impact concentrates and amplifies the Moon's magnetic field. But it was difficult to test – people have tried to model it, but it is right at the edge of what could work.

"We have a simpler idea," she continued. "Because the fields in this area are stronger than those found in any normal lunar rocks, our hypothesis is that it isn't lunar material. We know the magnetic properties of asteroidal material are much higher than that of the Moon. It is possible that metallic iron from an asteroid could have been magnetized by the impact, and deposited on the Moon."

Ironically, their first clue came from the surveys that had long confounded scientists.

When combined with more recent, hyper-accurate topographical surveys of the Moon's surface, it quickly became clear that most of the magnetic anomalies are scattered around the rim of an enormous, 2,400 kilometer-diameter crater known as South Pole-Aitken.

The oldest definitive structure on the Moon, the crater is between 3.9 and 4.5 billion years old, and is slightly elongated, suggesting it was formed by an object that struck the moon at an oblique angle.

Testing that hypothesis, however, proved tricky.

"The question was whether the projectile material could survive and stay on the Moon, and where it would end up," Stewart-Mukhopadhyay said. "What I did was model the impact and formation of the basin using computer codes that are typically used to model explosives."

To create those models, Stewart-Mukhopadhyay started with "equations of state," mathematical formulas that describe the asteroid and the Moon's crust, mantle and core. The far trickier part of modeling the impact, however, is in describing the rheology – the conditions under which each material deforms and flows.

"We modeled a number of scenarios using faster or slower impacts and more shallow or more vertical angles," she said. "Each time, the model produced similar results to what we see on the Moon."

Beyond its surprisingly simple explanation to a decades-old scientific puzzle, the paper suggests new ways to answer questions about what the early solar system was like, and how the magnetic fields of the planets were formed.

"We don't have much evidence of what was hitting the Earth before 3.9 billion years ago," Stewart-Mukhopadhyay said. "And there are some big questions about where those projectiles were coming from. Presumably if you picked up even the soil from this part of the Moon, you would have some of the material that came along with this large impact event.

"It may also be true that extra-terrestrial materials play a larger role in the magnetic fields of other planets than anyone has appreciated," she continued. "Magnetism is one of the clues that let us construct a geologic history of the surface of a planet. If we now have to consider that it may have come from a collision like this one, that's something we need to be aware of."

Explore further: N. America treated to partial solar eclipse Thurs.

Related Stories

Ancient lunar dynamo may explain magnetized moon rocks

Nov 09, 2011

The presence of magnetized rocks on the surface of the moon, which has no global magnetic field, has been a mystery since the days of the Apollo program. Now a team of scientists has proposed a novel mechanism ...

'Big splat' may explain the moon's mountainous far side

Aug 03, 2011

The mountainous region on the far side of the moon, known as the lunar farside highlands, may be the solid remains of a collision with a smaller companion moon, according to a new study by planetary scientists at the University ...

Biggest, Deepest Crater Exposes Hidden, Ancient Moon

Mar 04, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Shortly after the Moon formed, an asteroid smacked into its southern hemisphere and gouged out a truly enormous crater, the South Pole-Aitken basin, almost 1,500 miles across and more than ...

Lunar scientists shed light on Moon's impact history

Feb 28, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of researchers from the NASA Lunar Science Institute (NLSI) at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., have discovered that debris that caused a "lunar cataclysm" on the moon ...

Recommended for you

MAVEN studies passing comet and its effects

4 hours ago

NASA's newest orbiter at Mars, MAVEN, took precautions to avoid harm from a dust-spewing comet that flew near Mars today and is studying the flyby's effects on the Red Planet's atmosphere.

How to safely enjoy the October 23 partial solar eclipse

4 hours ago

2014 – a year rich in eclipses. The Moon dutifully slid into Earth's shadow in April and October gifting us with two total lunars. Now it's the Sun's turn. This Thursday October 23 skywatchers across much ...

How to grip an asteroid

5 hours ago

For someone like Edward Fouad, a junior at Caltech who has always been interested in robotics and mechanical engineering, it was an ideal project: help develop robotic technology that could one day fly on ...

Image: Comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

7 hours ago

It was 45 years ago when astronomer Klim Churyumov and Svetlana Gerasimenko, one of his researchers, unwittingly began a new chapter in the history of space exploration.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Silverhill
5 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2012
Be sure to check in Tycho crater for TMA-1... ;-)
ckid
1 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2012
So, did they consider that the moon was orbiting much closer to earth 4 billion years ago? Nickle-Iron asteroid hits moon resulting in molten iron/silica mix passing through earths magnetic field. Especially with a young hotter sun with greater solar wind deforming earths magnetic field lines more.
Callippo
1 / 5 (1) Mar 08, 2012
passing through earths magnetic field
Umm, isn't easier to assume, before 4 billions years the liquid core of Moon had its own magnetic field too?
Ethelred
3.7 / 5 (3) Mar 09, 2012
Especially with a young hotter sun


Well it may have had more solar wind but it was colder not hotter. Suns get hotter as they age.

http://en.wikiped...27s_fate

There is a really neat photo of the chromosphere there.

Ethelred