Invading trees?

Mar 09, 2012
Some of the research being undertaken to measure Arctic tree lines. Credit: Gareth Rees, Scott Polar Research Institute

Rumours of trees ‘invading’ the Arctic as a by-product of climate change have been ‘greatly exaggerated’ according to a polar scientist due to lecture on the subject at Cambridge University’s annual Science Festival.

Dr. Gareth Rees, Researcher at the University’s Scott Polar Research Institute, is speaking at the UK’s biggest free science festival on March 17, using his lecture to talk about the Arctic tree line – and questioning the reliability of vegetation predictions. He will suggest that the relationship between climate warming and tree growth is not as simple as initially thought.

Over the last century, the Earth’s surface temperature increased by about 0.7ºC on average, but global warming is thought to be greater than the average at high latitudes such as in the Arctic.

Climate models predict that the warming trend will continue and that it will be greater in the Arctic. If the forest keeps in step with the changing climate, should be advancing northwards at a rate of around 2km a year.

He said: “To generalize our results, the tree line is definitely moving north on average but we do not see any evidence for rates as big as 2km per year anywhere along the Arctic rim.

“Where we have the most detailed information, our results suggest that a rate of around 100 meters per year is more realistic. In some places, the tree line is actually moving south. The prediction of a loss of 40% of the tundra by the end of the century is probably far too alarming.”

Trees are prevented from growing in certain areas because of climatic limitations. Scientists believe that the transition zone from continuous boreal forest to tundra – known as the tree line – will respond to warmer temperatures by moving northwards.

Dr. Rees coordinates a group of experts who are beginning to question the extent to which the vegetation predictions are borne out in reality. He and his team have been looking primarily at the Arctic rim in Northern Europe, but there are other projects being carried out in Canada, Alaska, northern Scandinavia, Russia and Siberia.

He added: “What we are saying is that when you take the step from a climate model to a vegetation model, we may be doing that in a way that exaggerates what is actually happening. Furthermore, the response around the Arctic rim is by no means uniform. In some places along the Arctic rim the tree line is actually moving south.”

In addition to a suitable climate, there are many conditions necessary for the growth of trees such as the production of viable seeds, the absence of animals that destroy saplings and the presence of suitable soil. In some places, there is quite significant pressure holding back the advance of forests.

These findings are very important because they affect the global climate system. Forested land has a much different impact on the earth’s climate than flat ground in two ways.

Firstly, trees transpire much more water than smaller plants. This has a serious effect on the hydrological cycle. Scientists who develop models for the earth’s climate system need to know how water is being moved around in the global system.

Secondly, the increase of tree growth will accelerate warming trends that are already occurring. Trees help to increase the temperature of the climate system because they are very dark and absorb sunlight.

The vegetation to climate feedback is very important for scientists to understand how the global climate works and make climatic models. The climate dictates where vegetation can grow yet vegetation can change the climate.

Dr. Rees concluded: “We understand a bit about what’s going on but definitely not enough.”

Dr. Rees will be giving his talk Are trees invading the Arctic? on the movement of forest in the Arctic at the Cambridge Science Festival on March 17, 1.30pm-2.30pm at the Scott Polar Research Institute. It is free and suitable for ages ten plus. There will also be a chance to meet polar scientists and try some hands-on science, including tree hugging (a genuine way to estimate the height and age of a tree) and learning how to estimate the climatic value of a tree, in the ‘science on ice’ outdoor activities taking place at the Scott Polar Research between 10.30am-3pm.

Explore further: Landmark fracking study finds no water pollution

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Canadian tundra is rapidly disappearing

Mar 13, 2007

Canadian scientists say much of their nation's northern tundra is rapidly disappearing, being replaced by trees and shrubs, forcing wildlife from the region.

Climate change's impact on Arctic regions by 2099: study

Mar 14, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Imagine the vast, empty tundra in Alaska and Canada giving way to trees, shrubs and plants typical of more southerly climates. Imagine similar changes in large parts of Eastern Europe, northern ...

Tundra disappearing at rapid rate

Mar 05, 2007

Forests of spruce trees and shrubs in parts of northern Canada are taking over what were once tundra landscapes--forcing out the species that lived there. This shift can happen at a much faster speed than scientists originally ...

Scientists want polar bear protection

Jun 20, 2006

A U.S. climate researcher is leading a team of 30 North American and European scientists in urging the polar bear be listed as a threatened species.

Recommended for you

Landmark fracking study finds no water pollution

1 hour ago

The final report from a landmark federal study on hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has found no evidence that chemicals or brine water from the gas drilling process moved upward to contaminate drinking water at one site ...

Politics divide coastal residents' views of environment

2 hours ago

From the salmon-rich waters of Southeast Alaska to the white sand beaches of Florida's Gulf Coast to Downeast Maine's lobster, lumber and tourist towns, coastal residents around the U.S. share a common characteristic: ...

Earthworms as nature's free fertilizer

6 hours ago

Earthworm presence in the soil increases crop yield, shows a new study that was published this week in Scientific Reports. "This is not unexpected," says Jan Willem van Groenigen, associate professor in the ...

A success in managed pressure drilling

6 hours ago

As one of BP's top 40 wells globally (and the only UK well qualifying for that category in 2012), the successful delivery of the Harding field's 'Producer North East 2a' well (referred to as PNE2a) was crucial to the business. ...

Passion for the natural world clears the waters

6 hours ago

A toxic legacy has hung over the picturesque northern NSW coastal hamlet of Urunga for almost 40 years. Although now obscured by dense vegetation, the forest of dead melaleuca trees at the edge of a wetland ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

anonyminto
not rated yet Mar 17, 2012
Hmmm. I had NO idea that the Arctic soil was so fertile.... that trees can grow in a single year and over several kilometres from their parents....
This is a humongous finding and justifies moving all agricultural production to this amazing part of the globe.
Vendicar_Decarian
0.1 / 5 (36) Mar 17, 2012
You didn't read the article did you AnonymintoTard?

Here... Let me help you...

"Where we have the most detailed information, our results suggest that a rate of around 100 meters per year is more realistic" - article.

anonyminto
5 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2012
Well Vendimoron - look up use of exaggeration.
Trees dimwit, do not grow in the Arctic and do not grow in a year.
Vendicar_Decarian
not rated yet Mar 18, 2012
Sorry anon.. But the arctic treeline does extend into the arctic circle, as can be seen here.

http://www.athrop...rees.gif

and here...

http://t1.gstatic...WTm4UkeA