Fukushima lesson: Prepare for unanticipated nuclear accidents

Mar 08, 2012

A year after the crisis at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, scientists and engineers remain largely in the dark when it comes to fundamental knowledge about how nuclear fuels behave under extreme conditions, according to a University of Michigan nuclear waste expert and his colleagues.

In a review article in this week's edition of the journal Science, U-M's Rodney Ewing and two colleagues call for an ambitious, long-term national research program to study how nuclear fuels behave under the present during core-melt events like those that occurred at Fukushima following the March 11, 2011, magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami.

Three of the plant's six boiling-water reactors suffered partial core-melt events that involved tremendously and powerful radiation fields, as well as interaction between seawater and . Many tons of seawater were used to cool the overheated reactors and nearby spent-fuel storage ponds, and direct discharge of contaminated seawater to the ocean and groundwater occurred through approximately April 8.

"What I realized while watching all of this was how little we actually knew about what happens if you take hot seawater and pour it on nuclear fuel," said Ewing, a professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, the Department of and Radiological Sciences, and the Department of . Ewing is also a member of the U.S. Technical Review Board.

"No one, as far as I know, had asked the question, 'Well, what happens when you do this? Are we doing something really good or really bad?'" Ewing said. "That kind of information really wasn't available, and that expertise, as far as I could see, wasn't there to be called upon."

The use of seawater at Fukushima underscores the need for fundamental nuclear-fuel knowledge that can be applied over a range of unanticipated situations, Ewing said. The research should include studies of the various radioactive materials released from damaged fuel during a core-melt incident, as well as a thorough examination of how nuclear fuel interacts with fresh water and seawater, he said.

Such studies could lead to predictive models that would help nuclear plant operators respond to unforeseen events, taking appropriate and timely action to minimize impacts on the environment and human health. The Science paper reviews the current understanding of nuclear-fuel interactions with the environment during core-melt accidents.

"Almost by definition, an accident will be something that puts you in a situation that you didn't anticipate," said Ewing, Edward H. Kraus Distinguished University Professor. "So the research focus should be on the situations you don't expect to deal with. Right now, that kind of knowledge is fragmentary, at best."

Ewing's co-authors on the Science article are Peter Burns of the University of Notre Dame and Alexandra Navrotsky of the University of California, Davis. In the article, the authors note that the "studies outlined here are both difficult and expensive, but are essential to reduce the risk associated with an increasing reliance on nuclear energy."

Burns, Ewing and Navrotsky lead a Department of Energy-funded Energy Frontier Research Center that focuses on the materials science of actinides, the heaviest elements in the periodic table and critical elements in nuclear fuel. The research center includes scientists and engineers from six U.S. universities and three national laboratories.

On March 11, 2011, the three operational Fukushima reactors shut down promptly after the earthquake. Most of the fuel in the reactors was uranium dioxide.

When the tsunami inundated the site about 40 minutes after the earthquake, electrical power was lost, followed by the loss of onsite backup power, resulting in a station blackout and the loss of reactor coolant. A partial core-melt event ensued in units 1, 2 and 3.

The Japanese operator, TEPCO, has surmised that there was a nearly immediate loss of core cooling in unit 1, and almost all of its fuel assemblies melted and accumulated in the bottom of the pressure vessel. Partial melting of the cores in units 2 and 3, damaging one-third of the fuel assemblies in each, occurred over the following days.

Reaction of the zirconium alloy fuel cladding with water at high temperatures generated hydrogen gas that accumulated and exploded in four of the reactor units. The release of radioactivity, other than gaseous and volatile fission products, was dominated by the many tons of seawater used to cool the cores and storage pools.

Ewing said that—despite all the uncertainties and unknowns about the short- and long-term effects—using seawater to cool the Fukushima reactors was probably the right call.

"You have a crisis, you have to cool the cores, and you can't afford to wait around," he said. "Using the sounds like the right thing to do."

During the nuclear crisis that followed last year's earthquake and tsunami, 80,000 or more people were evacuated from the area nearest the plant; a year later, they remain displaced. The Japanese government is awarding an initial $13 billion in contracts to begin decontamination and rehabilitation of the more than 8,000-square-mile region most exposed to radioactive fallout.

All but two of Japan's 54 nuclear reactors remain shut down a year later, in a country where nuclear power once supplied nearly 30 percent of the electricity.

Explore further: Scientists invent award winning 2-in-1 motor for electric cars

Related Stories

How seawater could corrode nuclear fuel

Jan 26, 2012

Japan used seawater to cool nuclear fuel at the stricken Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear plant after the tsunami in March 2011 -- and that was probably the best action to take at the time, says Professor Alexandra ...

No uncontrolled reaction at Fukushima: operator

Nov 03, 2011

The operator of Japan's crippled Fukushima atomic plant Thursday played down fears of an uncontrolled chain reaction at the site, despite the discovery of evidence of recent nuclear fission.

Japan nuclear meltdown 'maybe worse than thought'

Dec 01, 2011

Molten nuclear fuel at Japan's Fukushima plant might have eaten two thirds of the way through a concrete containment base, its operator said, citing a new simulation of the extent of the March disaster.

US experts unsure about Fukushima situation

Mar 28, 2011

US experts have expressed uncertainty about the seriousness of the situation at Japan's Fukushima nuclear complex, steering clear of speculation whether the core of one of the reactors there had been damaged.

TEPCO to open second Fukushima reactor building

Jun 19, 2011

Tokyo Electric Power Co. said it will open a second reactor building at the stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant to send repair crews inside for the first time since it was crippled.

How does a nuclear meltdown work? (w/ Video)

Mar 17, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- When working properly, nuclear reactors produce large amounts of heat via nuclear fission reactions. The heat converts the surrounding water into steam, which turns turbines and generates ...

Recommended for you

First self-contained step dimming LED tube

4 hours ago

Samsung Electronics today introduced the industry's first AC Direct step-dimming LED linear replacement for T8 and T12 fluorescent tubes at the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) Convention ...

Battery system will be able to light 2,500 homes

5 hours ago

One of the largest, most environmentally-friendly, battery-based energy storage systems in the nation will be installed at the University of California, San Diego the campus announced today (Sept. 29).

NREL software tool a boon for wind industry

7 hours ago

Wind energy is blowing away skeptics—it's so close to achieving cost parity with fossil fuels that just a little extra efficiency is all that is likely needed to push it into the mainstream and past the ...

Harvesting energy from walking

8 hours ago

A device that fits into a shoe harvests the energy made by walking and successfully uses it in watch batteries.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Scottingham
not rated yet Mar 08, 2012
The last paragraph is sad. Is there a reason other than fear that they are ALL (-2) shut down?
bugmenot23
2.3 / 5 (3) Mar 08, 2012
"The last paragraph is sad. Is there a reason other than fear that they are ALL (-2) shut down?"

We have many Reasons to shut them down:
1: There is no Waste Program
2: Mostly they are to old
3: They are standing to close to some Fault Lines
4: The Tsunami Protection is to low
5: There is no working Emergency Plan
6: Japan is to small to loose more Land
7: Living in a Emergency Housing is No-Fun
etc., etc.!
Bogey
not rated yet Mar 09, 2012
I, like everyone else on the planet with a telly watched that cluster f*** unfold. What amazed me though was the fact that the moment they dicided to use see water to cool the reactors, they dident bother to get any serious sea water pumps to the scene.
I realise that they were dealing with the after effects of a huge tsunami, but if you are going to use sea water, why on earth did they not bother to get something like fire boats there. Seriously big, self contained, relativly radiation proof, long lasting, proper pumps.
Oh yeah, and you only need one length of hose.
Needs considering for the next time.
DaFranker
1 / 5 (1) Mar 09, 2012
Seriously big, self contained, relativly radiation proof, long lasting, proper pumps.

And I suppose you'd have donated such equipment to the cause for free had they asked for it, and taken upon yourself the cost to fly it over from whichever other country they're stored in?

I doubt they just had a bunch of the kind of pumps you're talking about "just lying around" in storage ready for pick-up. Any "available" pump would already be installed and in use somewhere, possibly a factory. It would also be owned by someone, who might not want to part with it. Manufacturing new pumps of such scale would have taken too long, and too many resources (manpower, logistics, etc.) considering what was already needed for simple damage control everywhere.
Bogey
not rated yet Mar 09, 2012
Exuse me Im on my fortnightly sabatcal. I will reply later hic.
Bogey
not rated yet Mar 10, 2012
Did you even bother to read what I said.
But no, your right. I would much rather hoover up radio active crap for the next 40 years.