Forage, corn feed alternative for cattle may come from biodiesel industry

Mar 12, 2012 By Kay Ledbetter
Researchers looked at four sets of cattle in different crude glycerin studies to determine its value as a livestock feed. Credit: Dr. Jim MacDonald

Crude glycerin, a byproduct of biodiesel production, could be an economical ingredient in cattle diets, according to studies by Texas AgriLife Research and West Texas A&M University personnel.

Dr. Jim MacDonald, AgriLife Research beef nutritionist in Amarillo, said during biodiesel production from sources such as cottonseed oil, glycerol is separated from fatty acids. The fatty acids become the biodiesel and the glycerol, combined with the impurities that remain, is a potential ingredient in livestock feed.

“Crude glycerin is usually priced at a discount relative to corn, so we wanted to look at replacing corn to evaluate at the energy value of the glycerin,” MacDonald said. “Then the question became, what if you replace forage, which would be the case with stocker cattle?”

MacDonald said glycerin has good flowability in low temperatures, as opposed to molasses or other similar products, and is non-corrosive to feeding equipment — both traits making it attractive to the cattle feeding industry.

Additionally, glycerin is low in phosphorus, protein and sulfur, which can be concentrated in other dietary ingredients, he said.

While the researchers knew the physical and nutritional properties made crude glycerin an attractive carrier in liquid supplement programs, relatively little was known about its performance implications in growing or high-concentrate finishing diets for beef cattle.

For the past two years, MacDonald has teamed up with Dr. Mike Brown at West Texas A&M University to conduct four experiments designed to determine the value of feeding crude glycerin in beef growing and finishing diets.

The studies were funded by the Texas Department of Agriculture Food and Fibers Research Grant Program with the thought that cottonseed oil could be used for biodiesel production. Capturing the value of the is important to bioenergy plants, and “that’s where we came in,” MacDonald said.

Another portion of the study was funded by the Department of Transportation – Research and Innovative Technology Administration through the South Central Sun Grant program.

The studies were designed to determine the feeding value, optimal concentration and which dietary components were most optimally displaced by crude glycerin in growing diets, he said.

Within the studies, the researchers looked at two strategies: replace corn or replace some forage. In the studies replacing corn, the researchers saw an optimal inclusion between 2.5 percent and 7.5 percent glycerin, MacDonald said. At 10 percent inclusion, feed efficiency was reduced.

When forage was replaced in one study, they saw no change in average daily gain, but the cattle consumed less feed and so feed efficiency was improved, Brown said. The feed efficiency was improved when either 5 percent or 10 percent glycerin was fed. Another advantage is a less bulky ration as forage is replaced.

“I feel very comfortable using crude glycerin up to 7.5 percent of a ,” MacDonald said.

The researchers even tested for a possible negative impact on fiber digestibility, but found none when the crude glycerin was fed at the low levels.

“We also saw an increase in microbial protein and a reduction in rumen ammonia,” MacDonald said.

This information could lead to further studies, he said. In high-forage diets, often excess nitrogen is formed in the rumen, which is excreted as urea and volatilized into the atmosphere as ammonia. The crude may allow more of the nitrogen to be captured before it is excreted and, thus, reduce ammonia emissions of cattle grazing high quality forage.

“We also observed no negative impacts on animal health up to 10 percent inclusion in diets of newly received calves,” MacDonald said.

Explore further: New research finds that world-class sprinters attack the ground to maximize impact forces and speed

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Biotech breakthrough could end biodiesel's glycerin glut

Jun 26, 2007

With U.S. biodiesel production at an all-time high and a record number of new biodiesel plants under construction, the industry is facing an impending crisis over waste glycerin, the major byproduct of biodiesel production. ...

Recommended for you

Biotech firm's GM mosquitoes to fight dengue in Brazil

2 hours ago

It's a dry winter day in southeast Brazil, but a steamy tropical summer reigns inside the labs at Oxitec, where workers are making an unusual product: genetically modified mosquitoes to fight dengue fever.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dschlink
not rated yet Mar 12, 2012
This is a great idea. Disposal of crude glycerin is a major problem in biodiesel production, even at the hobbyist level. Refining it enough to use as an industrial chemical costs more than the wholesale price. The same impurities are probably pluses in cattle feed.
KBK
1 / 5 (1) Mar 12, 2012
your mother told you, when you were a kid, eating junk food.... that you are what you eat.

Science and research backs this up 110%

So... we're going to feed toxic waste to cattle and expect that nothing comes of it?

What low intellect limited reach idiots though this one up?

McDonald's restaurants and.... Texas. how 'bout that GM corn with built in pesticides, you know, nerve toxins and similar fare, built right in.

And that bio-fuels are not efficient, they take up farmland that can feed starving millions exactly as that land was doing - before GM corn and biofuel) and that the GM corn is literally ~killer~.

I never would have guessed.
nkalanaga
not rated yet Mar 12, 2012
How can crude glycerin be "toxic waste" if it has no toxic effects?
From the Material Safety Data Sheets, the only significant health hazard is inhalation, and it doesn't vaporize readily. Overconsuption can be harmful, but the same goes for almost any "natural" food, and it is not carcinogenic.

Potential Health Effects
Inhalation: High mist concentrations may cause irritation.
Eye Contact: May cause transient irritation. Symptoms include burning, stinging and tearing.
Skin Contact: No specific hazard known. May cause transient irritation.
Ingestion: No specific hazard known.
Target Organ(s): Lung
Eikka
not rated yet Mar 13, 2012
I never would have guessed.


You also wouldn't have guessed that you eat crude glycerin every day. It's used in low fat products as a filler, in cosmetics, drinks, sweeteners, shortenings and margarine. Look for the code E422

The irony is that when low-fat products use glycerin to replace fat, people think it's healthy and they won't gain weight on it, but pound for pound it's like eating sugar, and nutritionally it's pretty much empty calories.