More economical way to produce cleaner, hotter natural gas

Mar 26, 2012
Hani M. El-Kaderi, assistant professor in the VCU Department of Chemistry, and Mohammad G. Rabbani, Ph.D., a research scientist in El-Kaderi’s lab who led the research efforts, hold flasks containing a new material to make the transport, storage and use of natural gas more efficient. Credit: Timur Islamoglu/VCU

New technology is offering the prospect of more economical production of a concentrated form of natural gas with many of the advantages — in terms of reduced shipping and storage costs — of the familiar frozen fruit juice concentrates, liquid laundry detergents and other household products that have been drained of their water, scientists reported today.

They told the 243rd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS) that this "super " would burn hotter than the familiar workhorse fuel and occupy about 40 percent less space in pipelines, railroad tank cars and storage chambers. But its potential benefits range beyond that — to making natural gas a better source of hydrogen for use in fuel-cell-powered cars in the much-discussed "hydrogen economy" of the future, according to Mohammad G. Rabbani, Ph.D., who reported on the study and is a research scientist in the team of Hani El-Kaderi, Ph.D.

"Natural gas has a reputation among the public as a clean-burning fuel, and that is true," said El-Kaderi. "Compared to coal and oil, burning natural gas releases small amounts of pollutants and less , the main greenhouse gas. People may not realize, however, that natural gas straight from the well often is contaminated with carbon dioxide and other undesirable gases, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, that are highly corrosive, increase its volume and decrease its heating value. Our new porous polymers, which have exceptionally high thermal and chemical stabilities, remove that carbon dioxide and do it better than any other solid, porous material."

Scientists are searching for such new solid materials to purify natural gas, and the quest has grown more intense as reserves of high-quality gas, lower in contaminants and higher in heating value, grow scarcer, and concerns about global warming due to carbon dioxide continue. The traditional process for purifying natural gas, performed for decades, uses liquids to capture and separate the carbon dioxide and other gases. The process, however, is far from ideal, and scientists are seeking solids and other materials that can more efficiently capture the carbon dioxide, and then can be purged of the gas more economically, recycled and reused time and again. "Our theoretical studies on variable mixtures of CO2/CH4 have actually indicated that these polymers would have high selectivities for CO2," said Thomas E. Reich, Ph.D., who performed these theoretical investigations as a part of his doctoral research in the El-Kaderi group.

El-Kaderi's group developed purely organic polymers termed benzimidazole-linked polymers (BILPs) that are riddled with nano-engineered, minute, empty chamber-like pores so small that thousands would fit on the period at the end of this sentence. When exposed to streams of natural gas, the pores absorb and trap its carbon dioxide. When all of the pores are full of carbon dioxide, the BILPs can be run through a low-pressure processing unit to remove the carbon dioxide and prepare them for reuse.

Rabbani, who is in El-Kaderi's team at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, noted that the new material is as effective at capturing carbon dioxide as monoethanolamine, the most common nitrogen-based liquid used for carbon dioxide scrubbing. Amine liquids have a disadvantage, however, in that they must be purged of carbon dioxide by heating, which requires more energy than the BILPs, which are regenerated under low-pressure conditions.

El-Kaderi said the BILPs seem well-suited for removing the traces of carbon dioxide that remain in hydrogen produced with existing technology. "Carbon dioxide can account for 20 percent of the finished product, the hydrogen, and if we consider a true hydrogen economy of the future, we should be removing that carbon dioxide. Our technology appears to be an excellent candidate."

Explore further: Material generates steam under solar illumination

More information:
Abstract
There has been considerable interest in the development of new technologies and materials that allow CO2 removal from natural gas which is typically contaminated with over 40% CO2 and N2. The removal of CO2 would increase the energy density of natural gas making its storage and transportation more efficient, and enhances its conversion to hydrogen fuel. Given the relatively small and similar kinetic diameter of CH4 and CO2 molecules, their efficient separation remains a nontrivial task. The preparation of a library of benzimidazole-linked polymers (BILPs) featuring high surface area and amine functionalized pore walls will be presented and their performance in CO2 removal from natural gas will be discussed. Our studies show that the efficiency of BILPs in CO2 removal from CH4 depends upon the pore metrics and surface chemical functionalization. High CO2/CH4 selectivity in the range of 8.0~17 makes BILPs attractive for future use in natural gas purification applications.
Ref: Rabbani, M. G.; El-Kaderi, H. M., "Template-Free Synthesis of a Highly Porous Benzimidazole-Linked Polymer for CO2 Capture and H2 Storage," Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1650-1653. Rabbani, M. G.; Reich, T. E,; Kassab, R. M.; Jackson, K. T.; El-Kaderi, H. M. "High CO2 Uptake and Selectivity by Triptycene-Derived Benzimidazole-Linked Polymers," Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1411-1413.

Related Stories

New CO2 'scrubber' from ingredient in hair conditioners

Mar 24, 2010

Relatives of ingredients in hair-conditioning shampoos and fabric softeners show promise as a long-sought material to fight global warming by "scrubbing" carbon dioxide (CO2) out of the flue gases from coal-burning ...

Scientists discuss carbon dioxide uses

Mar 13, 2006

The use of environmentally friendly carbon dioxide as a refrigerant instead of ozone-depleting chemicals will be discussed at Purdue University this week.

Recommended for you

Kingston, Jamaica hybrid project to harness sun and wind

Jul 19, 2014

A hybrid energy project in Kingston, Jamaica, aims to satisfy the need for money-saving renewable energy. U.S.-based WindStream Technologies recently announced the wind solar hybrid installation commissioned ...

Security contest techies say they hacked Tesla Model S

Jul 19, 2014

The good news: Tomorrow's cars are computers on wheels. The bad news: Tomorrow's cars are computers on wheels. Ma Jie, writing in Bloomberg News, reported this week that the Tesla Model S sedan was the target ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeddy_Mctedder
1 / 5 (3) Mar 26, 2012
this sounds HUGE. the low prices on natural gas promise a future of competition for electricity production at HOME with small generators and possibly---fuel cells---providing power on demand, in addition to the t.boone pickens plan which would make it possible to build on the infrastructure for truck cng refilling stations more cheaply , and possibly allow for at home filling using far less energy and time as the current capabilities of at home compressors are still limited by the diameter of the gas line to the house ( which isn't feasible to change )----so higher 'octante' natural gas without a need for toxic additives ( as used for gasoline and diesel ) is a simple but huge help towards the attempt at giving cng an extra push towards competitive usage to substitute transportation fuels, home heating, and in limited cases, home electricity generation.
Grallen
not rated yet Mar 27, 2012
@jeddy: Large generators transmission lines are more efficient than small local generators. Same deal if those large generators are fuel cell tech.

I'm not sure under what circumstances, if any, anyone could buy natural gas and generate their own energy cheaper than grid energy. Most specially since the large generation plant would also probably get some sort of bulk discount on the gas.
BuddyEbsen
1 / 5 (2) Mar 28, 2012
I'm not sure under what circumstances, if any, anyone could buy natural gas and generate their own energy cheaper than grid energy.


I would think any remote area such as the far north, which is not part of any grid, LNG would be a cheaper option. They currently use diesel for a great deal of power generation, it has to be cheaper and cleaner than that.