Australian study: Store brands battle quality perceptions

Mar 19, 2012

Store brands now account for more than 22 per cent of supermarket sales in Australia yet consumers are still wary about their quality, new research has found.

According to Drs Mauricio Palmeira and Dominic Thomas from Monash University’s Department of Marketing, consumers’ perception of the of store-branded goods is influenced by whether or not there is a "value" brand in the same product range as a "premium" brand.

“The research focused on assessing the impact of a second store brand positioned at a different quality level on consumers' expectations and decisions,” Dr. Palmeira said.

Store brands first emerged as cheaper alternatives to national brands. Now as the supermarkets increase the number of store-brand items on their shelves - and introduce "premium" options - they have to overcome years of thinking that store brands are of a lower quality.

“The results of our studies highlighted the retailers’ difficulty in breaking these associations, as participants demonstrated insensitivity to a retailer’s positioning of its range of premium store-brand items,” Dr. Palmeira said.

“The premium ranges, focusing on quality and selectivity, were met with the same low expectations of quality and price as those of the value-for-money range.”

The researchers also looked at any changes to the perception of the quality of a premium product when a value store brand was introduced.

“We examined order effects of a value store brand being added to the range. When a premium store brand is the first brand rolled out it is perceived as a value brand, but later when a cheaper store brand is added to the range, it increases the profile of the premium brand.”

Following the initial blind testing, the consumers were then provided with the actual names and descriptions of the store brands resulting in a rise in the perceptions of quality of the premium store brand.

The research also highlighted the need for retailers to increase their communication about their store brands to , with a majority of participants saying they were largely unaware of price and quality difference.

“Having two store brands did not automatically have customers thinking that one is a premium brand,” Dr. Thomas said.

“As the major supermarket chains look to increase their range of store-brand items, they need to communicate better to their customers to increase the perception of quality of their premium store brands and therefore sales.”

Explore further: Economist probes the high cost of health care

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Gas versus groceries

Mar 10, 2011

A University of Alberta researcher says grocery retailers need to take heed that a jump at the pumps will be a blow to their bottom line. Alberta School of Business professor Yu Ma notes that if stores want ...

Recommended for you

Economist probes the high cost of health care

Mar 27, 2015

When Zack Cooper arrived at Yale as assistant professor of public health and economics, he gained access to a first-of-its-kind dataset. Working with the non-profit Health Care Cost Institute, Cooper and ...

Cash remains king in Chile but its days could be numbered

Mar 26, 2015

For more than a year now, Chileans have endured a crisis of cash access. Despite global moves toward new forms of payment such as contactless and mobile transfers, the crisis in Chile highlights the continuing ...

Will you ever pay off your student loan?

Mar 25, 2015

Would-be participants of higher education must be given full and transparent advice before they accumulate debts as students that follow them into the workplace, according to a report published in the International Journal of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Mar 19, 2012
Among other things, if the "premium" store brands are better than the regular store brands, and on a par with the "brand name" items, then the regular store brands are definitely of lower quality, it's not just a "perception". Even admitting the difference in quality there seems an initiative to demean the observations of the "rank and file" as meaningless. The reference to the "value for money range" of products can also raise the question of whether that is meant to suggest that name brands do not provide value in line with their price.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 20, 2012
More likely the premium and regular brands have the same content. But the premium will have a better printed label and a superior sounding name. But there will be many more ways for a customer to decide what is best, does it taste better? is it cooler to be be seen consuming that brand? Is it more healthy? do you get more? Does it come from a better place?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.