Australian study: Store brands battle quality perceptions

Mar 19, 2012

Store brands now account for more than 22 per cent of supermarket sales in Australia yet consumers are still wary about their quality, new research has found.

According to Drs Mauricio Palmeira and Dominic Thomas from Monash University’s Department of Marketing, consumers’ perception of the of store-branded goods is influenced by whether or not there is a "value" brand in the same product range as a "premium" brand.

“The research focused on assessing the impact of a second store brand positioned at a different quality level on consumers' expectations and decisions,” Dr. Palmeira said.

Store brands first emerged as cheaper alternatives to national brands. Now as the supermarkets increase the number of store-brand items on their shelves - and introduce "premium" options - they have to overcome years of thinking that store brands are of a lower quality.

“The results of our studies highlighted the retailers’ difficulty in breaking these associations, as participants demonstrated insensitivity to a retailer’s positioning of its range of premium store-brand items,” Dr. Palmeira said.

“The premium ranges, focusing on quality and selectivity, were met with the same low expectations of quality and price as those of the value-for-money range.”

The researchers also looked at any changes to the perception of the quality of a premium product when a value store brand was introduced.

“We examined order effects of a value store brand being added to the range. When a premium store brand is the first brand rolled out it is perceived as a value brand, but later when a cheaper store brand is added to the range, it increases the profile of the premium brand.”

Following the initial blind testing, the consumers were then provided with the actual names and descriptions of the store brands resulting in a rise in the perceptions of quality of the premium store brand.

The research also highlighted the need for retailers to increase their communication about their store brands to , with a majority of participants saying they were largely unaware of price and quality difference.

“Having two store brands did not automatically have customers thinking that one is a premium brand,” Dr. Thomas said.

“As the major supermarket chains look to increase their range of store-brand items, they need to communicate better to their customers to increase the perception of quality of their premium store brands and therefore sales.”

Explore further: Pioneering research unveils new method for quantifying people-related risks within the LNG industry

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Gas versus groceries

Mar 10, 2011

A University of Alberta researcher says grocery retailers need to take heed that a jump at the pumps will be a blow to their bottom line. Alberta School of Business professor Yu Ma notes that if stores want ...

Recommended for you

Performance measures for CEOs vary greatly, study finds

5 hours ago

As companies file their annual proxy statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) this spring, a new study by Rice University and Cornell University shows just how S&P 500 companies have ...

Investment helps keep transport up to speed

9 hours ago

Greater investment in education and training for employees will be required to meet the future needs of the transport and logistics industry, according to recent reports by Monash University researchers.

Sharing = Stealing: Busting a copyright myth

Apr 11, 2014

Consumers copy and share digital files. This has been blamed for a potentially catastrophic decline in certain markets. But why do consumers copy? And is it as economically harmful as often thought?

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Mar 19, 2012
Among other things, if the "premium" store brands are better than the regular store brands, and on a par with the "brand name" items, then the regular store brands are definitely of lower quality, it's not just a "perception". Even admitting the difference in quality there seems an initiative to demean the observations of the "rank and file" as meaningless. The reference to the "value for money range" of products can also raise the question of whether that is meant to suggest that name brands do not provide value in line with their price.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 20, 2012
More likely the premium and regular brands have the same content. But the premium will have a better printed label and a superior sounding name. But there will be many more ways for a customer to decide what is best, does it taste better? is it cooler to be be seen consuming that brand? Is it more healthy? do you get more? Does it come from a better place?

More news stories

Down's chromosome cause genome-wide disruption

The extra copy of Chromosome 21 that causes Down's syndrome throws a spanner into the workings of all the other chromosomes as well, said a study published Wednesday that surprised its authors.

Researchers see hospitalization records as additional tool

Comparing hospitalization records with data reported to local boards of health presents a more accurate way to monitor how well communities track disease outbreaks, according to a paper published April 16 in the journal PLOS ON ...

Ebola virus in Africa outbreak is a new strain

The Ebola virus that has killed scores of people in Guinea this year is a new strain—evidence that the disease did not spread there from outbreaks in some other African nations, scientists report.