Men might not 'become extinct' after all: Theory of the 'rotting' Y chromosome dealt a fatal blow

February 22, 2012 by Matt Fearer

sex chromosomes

The two sex chromosomes from a human cell. Image: ©2003 Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

(PhysOrg.com) -- If you were to discover that a fundamental component of human biology has survived virtually intact for the past 25 million years, you'd be quite confident in saying that it is here to stay.

Such is the case for a team of Whitehead Institute scientists, whose latest research on the evolution of the human confirms that the Y—despite arguments to the contrary—has a long, healthy future ahead of it.

Proponents of the so-called rotting Y theory have been predicting the eventual extinction of the Y chromosome since it was first discovered that the Y has lost hundreds of genes over the past 300 million years. The rotting Y theorists have assumed this trend is ongoing, concluding that inevitably, the Y will one day be utterly devoid of its genetic content.

Over the past decade, Whitehead Institute Director David Page and his lab have steadily been churning out research that should have permanently debunked the rotting Y theory, but to no avail.

"For the past 10 years, the one dominant storyline in public discourse about the Y is that it is disappearing," says Page. "Putting aside the question of whether this ever had a sound scientific basis, the story went viral—fast—and has stayed viral. I can't give a talk without being asked about the disappearing Y. This idea has been so pervasive that it has kept us from moving on to address the really important questions about the Y."

To Page, this latest research represents checkmate in the chess match he's been drawn into against the "rotting Y" theorists. Members of his lab have dealt their fatal blow by sequencing the Y chromosome of the rhesus macaque—an Old World monkey whose evolutionary path diverged from that of humans some 25 million years ago—and comparing it with the sequences of the human and chimpanzee Y chromosomes. The comparison, published this week in the online edition of the journal Nature, reveals remarkable genetic stability on the rhesus and human Ys in the years since their evolutionary split.

Grasping the full impact of this finding requires a bit of historical context. Before they became specialized sex chromosomes, the X and Y were once an ordinary, identical pair of autosomes like the other 22 pairs of chromosomes humans carry. To maintain genetic diversity and eliminate potentially harmful mutations, autosome pairs swap genes with each other in a process referred to as "crossing over." Roughly 300 million years ago, a segment of the X stopped crossing over with the Y, causing rapid genetic decay on the Y. Over the next hundreds of millions of years, four more segments, or strata, of the X ceased crossing over with the Y. The resulting gene loss on the Y was so extensive that today, the human Y retains only 19 of the more than 600 genes it once shared with its ancestral autosomal partner.

"The Y was in free fall early on, and genes were lost at an incredibly rapid rate," says Page. "But then it leveled off, and it's been doing just fine since."

How fine? Well, the sequence of the rhesus Y, which was completed with the help of collaborators at the sequencing centers at Washington University School of Medicine and Baylor College of Medicine, shows the chromosome hasn't lost a single ancestral gene in the past 25 million years. By comparison, the human Y has lost just one ancestral gene in that period, and that loss occurred in a segment that comprises just 3% of the entire chromosome. The finding allows researchers to describe the Y's evolution as one marked by periods of swift decay followed by strict conservation.

"We've been carefully developing this clearcut way of demystifying the of the Y chromosome," says Page lab researcher Jennifer Hughes, whose earlier work comparing the human and chimpanzee Ys revealed a stable human Y for at least six million years. "Now our empirical data fly in the face of the other theories out there. With no loss of genes on the rhesus Y and one gene lost on the human Y, it's clear the Y isn't going anywhere."

"This paper simply destroys the idea of the disappearing Y chromosome," adds Page. "I challenge anyone to argue when confronted with this data."

More information: "Strict evolutionary conservation followed rapid gene loss on human and rhesus Y chromosomes" Nature, online February 22, 2012. DOI: 10.1038/nature10843

Journal reference: Nature search and more info website

Provided by Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research search and more info website

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

epsi00
Feb 22, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Only a fool will dare to argue with the facts established by the authors.
Sinister1811
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
I always thought the theory that the male chromosome would eventually die out was nonsense. Now it's proven [to be] nonsense.
baudrunner
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
The Y could never disappear altogether. The essential genes driving the biological imperative preclude the patently illogical possibility of that chromosome disappearing.

Nature sought fit to equip those necessary genes with their own chromosome. The X has over 3,000 genes. The determination of the Y to stay around is expressed elegantly with the presence of an extra, supposedly superfluous Y chromosome, which renders the X completely dysfunctional.
gwrede
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
This must be devastating news to feminists, and Women's Studies.

(http://en.wikiped...studies)
evropej
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Take this lightly lol

Men have evolved throughout time and removed unnecessary genes which cause PMS, over talking, over emotions, over exaggeration, complication, etc

Sorry, it was too tempting =]
Mike_Massen
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
But nonetheless a nest builder loves a hunter/predator for all sorts of dominant characteristics and play interaction reasons regardless of whether they are open to IVF or female to female relationships, not giving away any personal experiences of course...

edit:
Just to add, if we ever get the artificial wombs of the era of Dune (Frank Herbert) then men will still be around, though maybe in reduced numbers, to offer diversity as play things, so watch out, get fit, get smart and get networked and survive - or I will hunt you guys down and force you to eat Maccas for a whole year !
Kingsix
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
YAY men!
Sean_W
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aren't there some species where the y has disappeared and they still have two sexes with the determination being made by the father contributing either an x or no x?
jerkinwithmirkin
Feb 24, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
This must be devastating news to feminists, and Women's Studies.

(http://en.wikiped...studies)


Remember, if it doesn't align with their views it's not true. "How dare the sexist pigs who published this study say anything like that!"
Rank 5 /5 (12 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus

An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.

Biology / Biotechnology

created 13 hours ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Biology / Evolution

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 3.4 / 5 (22) | comments 98

More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought

(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.

Biology / Ecology

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (14) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)

It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.

Biology / Plants & Animals

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 8 | with audio podcast

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Biology / Ecology

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (7) | comments 7


Stunning image of smallest possible five-ringed structure

Scientists have created and imaged the smallest possible five-ringed structure – about 100,000 times thinner than a human hair – and you'll probably recognise its shape.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...