Spain to extend life of its oldest nuclear plant

Feb 19, 2012
Anti-nuclear demonstrators protest in front of the Santa Maria de Garona nuclear plant with a banner reading 'Garona is safe' in 2011. Spain will extend operations at its oldest nuclear power plant by five years, Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria said as the country seeks to make the most of its energy sources.

Spain will extend operations at its oldest nuclear power plant by five years, Industry Minister Jose Manuel Soria said Saturday as the country seeks to make the most of its energy sources.

The decision was immediately slammed as "irresponsible" by environmentalists.

"The council has given approval for a five-year extension" of the Garona plant near Burgos, northern Spain, Soria told a meeting of his conservative Popular Party in Seville, southern Spain.

"We cannot allow ourselves to under-utilise any of our energy resources," the minister added, as Spain faces a likely and has undertaken a major austerity programme to clean up its finances.

"We need a good mix, a good combination" of power sources, Soria said.

Garona, first brought on line in 1971, is owned in equal parts by Spanish power companies Iberdrola and via their joint venture Nuclenor.

Environmental group Greenpeace has pressed for its closure, portraying it as a "twin sister" of the Fukushima plant in Japan that was hit by an earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, causing reactor meltdowns.

And one of Spain's main environmentalist groups, Ecologistas en accion, said Saturday that "maintaining an old plant that was built before conclusions were drawn from the worst nuclear accidents ... and which suffers from unresolved problems, is irresponsible".

"It is obvious that this body (the nuclear watchdog) represents the interests of Nuclenor, to the detriment of Spanish society".

A decision to shut Garona on April 1, 2013 was overturned as Spain tries to lessen its dependence on fossil fuels.

Spain is home to six that include eight reactors, and lawmakers agreed in February to extend the pre-established lifespan of 40 years for the facilities.

Explore further: After nuclear phase-out, Germany debates scrapping coal

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Spain facing key decision on use of nuclear power

Jun 11, 2009

The Spanish government will have to take a clear stand for or against nuclear power in the coming weeks when it decides whether to renew the operating licence of the oldest of the country's six nuclear plants.

German cabinet passes nuclear exit bill

Jun 06, 2011

The German cabinet signed off Monday on a bill phasing out nuclear power in Europe's biggest economy by 2022, prompted by the disaster in March at Japan's Fukushima plant.

Japan vows to continue nuclear plant exports

Aug 05, 2011

Japan said Friday it will continue exporting atomic power plants, despite uncertainty over its own use of them as it continues to grapple with a crisis at the tsunami-hit Fukushima nuclear plant.

US and Spain discuss cleanup of nuclear radiation

Feb 05, 2012

The United States is offering technical assistance to Spain to clean up land contaminated by radiation from undetonated nuclear bombs that accidentally fell on the area in 1966, the US State Department announced ...

Recommended for you

New battery technology for electric vehicles

Nov 21, 2014

Scientists at the Canadian Light Source are on the forefront of battery technology using cheaper materials with higher energy and better recharging rates that make them ideal for electric vehicles (EVs).

Company powers up with food waste

Nov 19, 2014

Garden products company Richgro is using Western Australian food waste to power their operations in a new zero-waste system.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

StarGazer2011
1 / 5 (1) Feb 19, 2012
Hey dont they have all that profitable and not-subsidised at all solar thermal power? This is the unintended consequence of eco-loons, they demand unworkable solutions (solar) and refuse workable ones (fossil fuels), and so, when the unworkable solutions dont work, the government has no choice but to keep a potentially dangerous reactor operating rather than have nice cheap fossil fuels ready to go.
If this thing melts down, it is on the heads of Greenpeace and other activist fools who demanded windmills and fairy dust instead of working technologies.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.