# Samples returned from asteroid Itokawa reveal history of violent impacts

##### February 28, 2012 by Bob Yirka report

(PhysOrg.com) -- In June of 2010, Japanese researchers launched a probe called Hayabusa into space on a mission to study the asteroid Itokawa (25143). It managed to collect dust specimens from the asteroid’s surface which were subsequently (for the first time ever) brought back to Earth when the probe parachuted into the Australian outback. Since that time, the specimens have been studied in every imaginable way resulting in several papers being published in several journals. Now, in a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the research team is reporting on its findings after placing several specimens under an electron microscope.

To study the dust particles more closely the team cut five of the grains into smaller pieces and placed them under an electron microscope. What they found were dust particles that very clearly displayed a violent history. The grains were pitted, or cratered, indicating they had been struck by other particles at speeds high enough to cause them to melt on impact. They also found other particles stuck to the grains that had struck hard enough to embed themselves; to cause such affects, the researchers estimate that the smaller particles must have been traveling at speeds between ten and twenty two thousand miles per hour - particles that were micro to micron sized. In studying the particles that had stuck, the researchers found several that were apparently made of glass.

Because the were taken from the surface of the , they believe they represent the low gravity environment that the asteroid would have encountered as it journeyed through space. Thus, the outside layer is made up mostly of ordinary chondrite material.

Itokawa is a 500 meter long asteroid that is believed to be a fragment of a much larger rock, some suggest one as large as 20 kilometers long, and because it has such a low density, many in the research community refer to it as more of a rubble pile than a true asteroid. It was first discovered in 1998 and named for famed Japanese scientist Hideo Itokawa. Hayabusa brought back more than fifteen hundred particle samples.

The team’s findings suggest that rather than existing as static remnants created during the formation of the solar system, as many in the past have assumed, asteroids appear to have undergone almost constant change as they have struck and been struck by other space particles altering their exterior and perhaps their interior as well.

Explore further: Japanese lab finds 'minute particles' in asteroid pod

More information: Space environment of an asteroid preserved on micrograins returned by the Hayabusa spacecraft, PNAS, Published online before print February 27, 2012, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116236109 (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)

Abstract
Records of micrometeorite collisions at down to submicron scales were discovered on dust grains recovered from near-Earth asteroid 25143 (Itokawa). Because the grains were sampled from very near the surface of the asteroid, by the Hayabusa spacecraft, their surfaces reflect the low-gravity space environment influencing the physical nature of the asteroid exterior. The space environment was examined by description of grain surfaces and asteroidal scenes were reconstructed. Chemical and O isotope compositions of five lithic grains, with diameters near 50 μm, indicate that the uppermost layer of the rubble-pile-textured Itokawa is largely composed of equilibrated LL-ordinary-chondrite-like material with superimposed effects of collisions. The surfaces of the grains are dominated by fractures, and the fracture planes contain not only sub-μm-sized craters but also a large number of sub-μm- to several-μm-sized adhered particles, some of the latter composed of glass. The size distribution and chemical compositions of the adhered particles, together with the occurrences of the sub-μm-sized craters, suggest formation by hypervelocity collisions of micrometeorites at down to nm scales, a process expected in the physically hostile environment at an asteroid’s surface. We describe impact-related phenomena, ranging in scale from 10-9 to 104 meters, demonstrating the central role played by impact processes in the long-term evolution of planetary bodies. Impact appears to be an important process shaping the exteriors of not only large planetary bodies, such as the moon, but also low-gravity bodies such as asteroids.

## Related Stories

#### Japanese lab finds 'minute particles' in asteroid pod

July 5, 2010

Japan's space agency said Monday it has found "minute particles" of what it hopes is asteroid dust in the capsule of the space probe Hayabusa which returned to Earth last month.

#### Hayabusa Contains a Hint of Dust

July 7, 2010

The sample return canister from the Hayabusa spacecraft has been opened, and does contain a small amount of dust, possibly from the asteroid Itokawa. Studying samples from an asteroid can help astrobiologists determine if ...

#### Japan space probe may have brought home space dust: reports

October 6, 2010

Japan's space agency has found particles that may be extra-terrestrial in the capsule of the space probe Hayabusa that returned home in June after a seven-year journey to an asteroid, reports said Wednesday.

#### No asteroid particles found in second Hayabusa compartment, but more in first

December 16, 2010

No visible material from asteroid Itokawa was found inside the second compartment of a canister returned to Earth by the Hayabusa spacecraft.

#### Earth-bound asteroids come from stony asteroids, new studies confirm

August 25, 2011

Researchers got their first up-close look at dust from the surface of a small, stony asteroid after the Hayabusa spacecraft scooped some up and brought it back to Earth. Analysis of these dust particles, detailed in a special ...

#### Dust settles to reveal asteroid truth

September 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Early results from analysis of dust on the Hayabusa space capsule, which landed in South Australia last year, have revealed an indisputable link between the asteroids we see in space and meteorites that we ...

## Recommended for you

#### 'Bathtub rings' suggest Titan's dynamic seas

July 28, 2015

Saturn's moon, Titan, is the only object in the Solar System other than Earth known to have liquid on its surface. While most of the lakes are found around the poles, the dry regions near the equator contain signs of evaporated ...

#### Born-again planetary nebula

July 28, 2015

Beneath the vivid hues of this eye-shaped cloud, named Abell 78, a tale of stellar life and death is unfolding. At the centre of the nebula, a dying star – not unlike our Sun – which shed its outer layers on its way to ...

#### We will find organic materials on Asteroid Bennu, says OSIRIS-REx principal investigator

July 27, 2015

(Phys.org)—In September 2016, NASA plans to launch its first-ever asteroid sample return mission loaded with tasks that will help us better understand the composition of asteroids, their origin, and possibly even Earth's ...

#### How an accidental discovery became the key to understanding the universe

July 24, 2015

Fifty years ago, Bob Dylan had only just gone electric, mankind had yet to take its great leap and many people thought the Big Bang was something that happened when you burst a Big Balloon.

#### Simulated map of missing satellite galaxies could answer dark matter puzzle

July 24, 2015

A ripple in the outskirts of the Milky Way—and a hunch—led Rochester Institute of Technology astrophysicist Sukanya Chakrabarti to a previously undetected dwarf galaxy hidden under a veil of dark matter. Now Chakrabarti ...

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

##### barakn
5 / 5 (4) Feb 28, 2012
The quality of the writing in the first paragraph is abysmal.
##### julianpenrod
1 / 5 (11) Feb 28, 2012
Right wing "nay-sayers" constantly condemn "conspiracy theories" as having no basis \in circumstances, as being nothing more than guesses. The claims about Hayabusa's claimed trip to asrteroid Itokawa, in fact, do lend themselves to the eminent suspicion upon which conspiracy theories rest.
Interesting, among other things, that no attempts seem to have been made to actually photograph the collection of samples from Itokawa. One of the few widely disseminated images purports to show the "shadow" of Hayabusa on Itokawa as it "approached". But look at the photograph and how large the "shadow" appears. Itokawa has a width from 200 to 300 meters, but Hayabusa is only about 6 meters wide with solar panels fully deployed. But the "shadow" is comparatively about 30 meters wide! The sun's rays going around Hayabusa are approximately parallel, so any "shadow" should be the same size as Hayabusa!
##### julianpenrod
1 / 5 (7) Feb 28, 2012
And the appearance of the asteroid is questionable in the extreme. The general "explanation" for boulder fields on asteroids is rubble from collisions. With the energy claimed for most collisions and a suggested escape velocity of 8 inches per second, it seems unreasonable it could collect such mounds of boulders. Indeed, Itokawa is about the size of the Enpire State Building. If it could hold mounds of rubble so well, the Empire State Building should have gravity that significantly deviates objects dropped near it.
And the very description of the mission, to fly low over the asteroid's surface and lower a scoop to gather soil. The smallest obstruction could cause torquie that would cause the entire probe to pivot over and crash. And, if not, it should have raised a cloud of dust ahead of it that would move with it, possibly penetrating its systems.
##### julianpenrod
1 / 5 (9) Feb 28, 2012
Add things like that the picture of the Hayabusa "shadow" are generally available only on sites written in foreign languages looks like there is an initiative to keep Americans who only speak one language from examining the photo. And the curious case of the Japanese examining only a Japanese discovered asteroid, as if they feel now they can say whatever they want without fear of international repercussions taking liberties with other countries' asteroids.
##### d_robison
5 / 5 (4) Feb 28, 2012
@julianpenrod

In the well-spoken words of Professor Farnsworth from Futurama, "I don't wish to live on this planet anymore." Unfortunately, I don't have the luxury or technology to do so.
##### Lurker2358
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
And the appearance of the asteroid is questionable in the extreme. The general "explanation" for boulder fields on asteroids is rubble from collisions. With the energy claimed for most collisions and a suggested escape velocity of 8 inches per second, it seems unreasonable it could collect such mounds of boulders. Indeed, Itokawa is about the size of the Enpire State Building. If it could hold mounds of rubble so well, the Empire State Building should have gravity that significantly deviates objects dropped near it.

While I agree with what you are saying here, you are not technically correct. The Empire State building is mostly empty space, surrounded substantial by walls, floors, and ceilings.

Surface gravity of this asteroid should be close to 0.00038 m/s^2.

Escape velocity is near 0.43m/s...

You could jump and easily obtain several times escape velocity, even in a space suit...

The supposed 11 to 17 km/s impact velocities should disintegrate objects this size.
##### lomed
not rated yet Feb 29, 2012
The sun's rays going around Hayabusa are approximately parallel, so any "shadow" should be the same size as Hayabusa!
Looking at the orbit of the asteroid on wikipedia (ref. http://en.wikiped..._Itokawa ), one sees that its distance from the Sun varies from 0.953 to 1.695 AU. At these distances the Sun has a non-negligible angular diameter. So, just like on Earth the farther an object is above a surface illuminated by the Sun the larger its penumbral shadow (ref. http://en.wikiped.../Umbra ).
##### julianpenrod
1 / 5 (1) Feb 29, 2012
The orbit for Itokara varies between 90,000,000 and about 160,000,000 miles. When Hayabusa was hovering near Itokawa, it was no more than a couple dozen miles high. That is so small an angular difference that changes in the size of the shadow should be miniscule. Certainly, the shadow should not be ten times the size of the probe. Unfortunately, there are so many determined to promote "the official story" that they will rabidly defend lomed's "explanation".
And, with respect to Lurker's comment, even if the Empire State Building is "mostly empty space", the density of the iron in its design is so much greater than the substance of Itokawa that its mass can be greater than that of the asteroid.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more