Ocean acidification turns climate change winners into losers: research

Feb 20, 2012

Adding ocean acidification and deoxygenation into the mix of climate change predictions may turn “winner” regions of fisheries and biodiversity into “losers,” according to research released today by University of British Columbia researchers.

Previous projections have suggested the effects of warmer water temperature would result in fish moving pole-ward and deeper towards cooler waters – and an increase of fish catch potential of as much as 30 per cent in the North Atlantic by 2050.

Accounting for effects of de-oxygenation and , however, some regions may see a 20-35 per cent reduction in maximum catch potential by 2050 (relative to 2005) – depending on the individual species’ sensitivity to ocean acidification.

For example, in the Norwegian Sea, ocean warming by itself may result in a 15 per cent increase in fisheries catch potential. However, accounting for acidification and de-oxygenation, the increase turns to a decrease of 15 per cent, and the region from a “winner” to a “loser.”

“Loser” regions in the tropics could become poorer and will require better strategies to mitigate potential food security issues.

“This study provides a clearer picture of the complex interactions between the different impacts on our oceans,” says William Cheung, an assistant professor in UBC’s Fisheries Centre, who presented his research today at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Vancouver, Canada.

Climate change and the associated physical and chemical changes in the ocean decrease oxygen in the water in some region. Meanwhile, approximately one-third of the carbon dioxide that humans produce by burning fossil fuels is being absorbed by the ocean, gradually causing the oceans to become more acidic and affecting biological processes of various marine organisms.

Cheung says that rebuilding global fisheries may increase the capacity of marine species to handle the impacts of climate change and acidification.

“This will require efforts on various fronts, including curbing overfishing and reducing carbon dioxide levels,” says Cheung.

Explore further: Feds to unveil cleanup plan for nuke waste dump

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US Atlantic cod population to drop by half by 2050

Feb 12, 2009

A University of British Columbia researcher put a number to the impact of climate change on world fisheries at today's Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Chicago.

Little room left for fisheries

Dec 02, 2010

The Earth has run out of room to expand fisheries, according to a new study led by University of British Columbia researchers that charts the systemic expansion of industrialized fisheries.

Recommended for you

Rating the planet's oceans

1 hour ago

The most comprehensive assessment conducted by the Ocean Health Index rates the Earth's oceans at 67 out of 100 in overall health. In addition, for the first time, the report assessed the Antarctic and the ...

Feds to unveil cleanup plan for nuke waste dump

4 hours ago

After nearly eight months, the U.S. Department of Energy has formalized a plan for cleaning up the federal government's troubled nuclear waste dump in southeastern New Mexico.

Climate change affecting species

6 hours ago

The Global Change and Sustainability Research Institute (GCSRI) and the Wits Rural Facility (WRF) hosted a top climate change scientist, Professor Camille Parmesan, who delivered a talk to staff, students ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

moebiex
not rated yet Feb 24, 2012
Problems into opportunities- On the spreading dead zones and low oxygen from increasing stratification- I just keep thinking that some brainy young guy is going to one day (if our current widespread cultural polarization can be stemmed in time to avert a wider war) come up with a system whereby electrical E sourced from wave, tide, wind and/or photovoltaic etc, is sent to depth to electrolyze water, capture the H2 for sequestration at surface, release the O2 in situ and you've got 2 positive results working for you: oxygenation plus induced circulation with some H2 that could be collected and fuel transport requirements etc as gravy. And that is not even considering the habitat enhancement for fish etc that structures could provide.