Part of Keystone XL oil pipeline to go ahead: company

Feb 27, 2012
Speaker of the House John Boehner stands next to a map of current oil pipelines during a news conference in January 2012 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. TransCanada Corp announced Monday it would go ahead with construction of part of its Keystone XL oil pipeline that does not require US presidential approval, a stretch from the state of Oklahoma to the US Gulf Coast.

TransCanada Corp announced Monday it would go ahead with construction of part of its Keystone XL oil pipeline that does not require US presidential approval, a stretch from the state of Oklahoma to the US Gulf Coast.

The company also said it will resubmit its proposal for the entirety of the pipeline from Canada that was rejected last month by US President , a move that sparked an election-year row over and the environment.

The new presidential permit application would include "an alternative route in Nebraska as soon as that route is selected," as well as an "already reviewed route" in Montana and South Dakota, TransCanada added.

Company president Russ Girling said he hoped the lengthy environmental review of the original project -- much of it unchanged in the new proposal -- will mean a shorter approval process once a new route in Nebraska is determined that avoids the ecologically sensitive Sandhills area, which lies above a vital agricultural aquifer.

The White House welcomed the re-application, saying "we support the company's interest in proceeding with this project, which will help address the bottleneck of oil in Cushing that has resulted in large part from increased domestic oil production, currently at an eight-year high."

Obama's office said in a statement that "moving oil from the Midwest to the world-class, state-of-the-art on the Gulf Coast will modernize our infrastructure, create jobs, and encourage American .

"We look forward to working with TransCanada to ensure that it is built in a safe, responsible and timely manner, and we commit to take every step possible to expedite the necessary Federal permits," the White House added.

Explore further: Tens of thousands expected at New York climate march

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Nebraska welcomes new pipeline route

Nov 16, 2011

Nebraska's governor on Tuesday welcomed a controversial US-Canada pipeline now that it will be rerouted away from the state's sensitive wetlands, but environmentalists vowed to keep up the fight.

US to study alternate route for US-Canada pipeline

Nov 10, 2011

The US government said Thursday it would study an alternate route for a controversial US-Canada oil pipeline, and pushed back its final decision on the project until 2013 -- after next year's presidential ...

Proposed pipeline could cost jobs, not create them

Oct 03, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Claims of job creation by the TransCanada Corp. Keystone XL Pipeline are inflated at best and misleading at worst, according to a new report by the ILR Global Labor Institute (GLI) posted on its website.

US sees no major harm from Keystone XL pipeline

Aug 26, 2011

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would bring oil from Canada's tar sands to the US Gulf Coast would have "no significant impact" on the environment, the United States said Friday.

Impact statement on US oil pipeline due in August

Jul 23, 2011

The US State Department said Friday it expects by mid-August to release a final environmental impact statement on a proposed $13 billion oil pipeline that would stretch from Canada to Texas.

Recommended for you

Rio's Olympic golf course in legal bunker

22 hours ago

The return of golf to the Olympics after what will be 112 years by the time Rio hosts South America's first Games in 2016 comes amid accusations environmental laws were got round to build the facility in ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

eigenbasis
not rated yet Feb 27, 2012
This is a horrible idea, with America's current trade imbalance we should be building pipelines from North Dakota and the western oil supplies to support our own economy - not Canada's!! Bad decisions like this is why our economy is in hurt in the first place, the US needs to support itself internally to bolster our assets. We should be sending our oil to Canadians, not the other way around