IBM research advances device performance for quantum computing

Feb 28, 2012
A picture of IBM’s “3D” superconducting qubit device where a qubit (about 1mm in length) is suspended in the center of the cavity on a small Sapphire chip. The cavity is formed by closing the two halves, and measurements are done by passing microwave signals to the connectors. Despite the apparent large feature size (the cavity is about 1.5 inches wide) for this single qubit demonstration, the team believes it is possible to scale such a system to hundreds or thousands of qubits.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Scientists at IBM Research have achieved major advances in quantum computing device performance that may accelerate the realization of a practical, full-scale quantum computer. For specific applications, quantum computing, which exploits the underlying quantum mechanical behavior of matter, has the potential to deliver computational power that is unrivaled by any supercomputer today.

Using a variety of techniques in the IBM labs, scientists have established three new records for reducing errors in elementary computations and retaining the integrity of quantum mechanical properties in (qubits) – the basic units that carry information within quantum computing. IBM has chosen to employ superconducting qubits, which use established microfabrication techniques developed for silicon technology, providing the potential to one day scale up to and manufacture thousands or millions of qubits.

IBM researchers will be presenting their latest results today at the annual American Physical Society meeting taking place February 27-March 2, 2012 in Boston, Mass.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The special properties of qubits will allow quantum computers to work on millions of computations at once, while desktop PCs can typically handle minimal simultaneous computations. For example, a single 250-qubit state contains more bits of information than there are atoms in the universe.

These properties will have wide-spread implications foremost for the field of data encryption where quantum computers could factor very large numbers like those used to decode and encode sensitive information.

"The quantum computing work we are doing shows it is no longer just a brute force physics experiment. It's time to start creating systems based on this science that will take computing to a new frontier," says IBM scientist Matthias Steffen, manager of the IBM Research team that's focused on developing quantum computing systems to a point where it can be applied to real-world problems.

Other potential applications for quantum computing may include searching databases of unstructured information, performing a range of optimization tasks and solving previously unsolvable mathematical problems.

The most basic piece of information that a typical computer understands is a bit. Much like a light that can be switched on or off, a bit can have only one of two values: "1" or "0". For qubits, they can hold a value of “1” or “0” as well as both values at the same time. Described as superposition, this is what allows quantum computers to perform millions of calculations at once.

One of the great challenges for scientists seeking to harness the power of quantum computing is controlling or removing quantum decoherence – the creation of errors in calculations caused by interference from factors such as heat, electromagnetic radiation, and materials defects. To deal with this problem, scientists have been experimenting for years to discover ways of reducing the number of errors and of lengthening the time periods over which the qubits retain their quantum . When this time is sufficiently long, error correction schemes become effective making it possible to perform long and complex calculations.

There are many viable systems that can potentially lead to a functional quantum computer. IBM is focusing on using superconducting qubits that will allow a more facile transition to scale up and manufacturing.

IBM has recently been experimenting with a unique “three dimensional” superconducting qubit (3D qubit), an approach that was initiated at Yale University. Among the results, the IBM team has used a 3D qubit to extend the amount of time that the qubits retain their quantum states up to 100 microseconds – an improvement of 2 to 4 times upon previously reported records. This value reaches just past the minimum threshold to enable effective error correction schemes and suggests that scientists can begin to focus on broader engineering aspects for scalability.

A picture of the Silicon chip housing a total of three qubits. The chip is back-mounted on a PC board and connects to I/O coaxial lines via wire bonds (scale: 8mm x 4mm). A larger assembly of such qubits and resonators are envisioned to be used for a scalable architecture.

In separate experiments, the group at IBM also demonstrated a more traditional “two-dimensional” qubit (2D qubit) device and implemented a two-qubit logic operation – a controlled-NOT (CNOT) operation, which is a fundamental building block of a larger quantum computing system. Their operation showed a 95 percent success rate, enabled in part due to the long coherence time of nearly 10 microseconds. These numbers are on the cusp of effective error correction schemes and greatly facilitate future multi-qubit experiments.

The implementation of a practical quantum computer poses tremendous scientific and technological challenges, but all results taken together paint an optimistic picture of rapid progress in that direction.

Core device technology and performance metrics at IBM have undergone a series of amazing advancements by a factor of 100 to 1,000 times since the middle of 2009, culminating in the recent results that are very close to the minimum requirements for a full-scale quantum computing system as determined by the world-wide research community. In these advances, IBM stresses the importance and value of the ongoing exchange of information and learning with the quantum computing research community as well as direct university and industrial collaborations.

“The superconducting qubit research led by the IBM team has been progressing in a very focused way on the road to a reliable, scalable quantum computer. The device performance that they have now reported brings them nearly to the tipping point; we can now see the building blocks that will be used to prove that error correction can be effective, and that reliable logical qubits can be realized,” observes David DiVincenzo, professor at the Institute of Quantum Information, Aachen University and Forschungszentrum Juelich.

Based on this progress, optimism about superconducting qubits and the possibilities for a future quantum are rapidly growing. While most of the work in the field to date has focused on improvements in device performance, efforts in the community now must now include systems integration aspects, such as assessing the classical information processing demands for error correction, I/O issues, feasibility, and costs with scaling.

IBM envisions a practical quantum computing system as including a classical system intimately connected to the hardware. Expertise in communications and packaging technology will be essential at and beyond the level presently practiced in the development of today’s most sophisticated digital computers.

Explore further: Quantum mechanics to charge your laptop?

Related Stories

At Yale, quantum computing is a (qu)bit closer to reality

Feb 15, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Physicists at Yale University have taken another significant step in the development of quantum computing, a new frontier in computing that promises exponentially faster information processing ...

Three tiny qubits, another big step toward quantum computing

Sep 29, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The rules that govern the world of the very small, quantum mechanics, are known for being bizarre. One of the strangest tenets is something called quantum entanglement, in which two or more objects (such ...

Recommended for you

Quantum mechanics to charge your laptop?

8 hours ago

Top scientists from UC Berkeley and MIT found the expertise they lacked at FIU. They invited Sakhrat Khizroev, a professor with appointments in both medicine and engineering, to help them conduct research ...

Physicists design zero-friction quantum engine

Sep 16, 2014

(Phys.org) —In real physical processes, some energy is always lost any time work is produced. The lost energy almost always occurs due to friction, especially in processes that involve mechanical motion. ...

Fluid mechanics suggests alternative to quantum orthodoxy

Sep 12, 2014

The central mystery of quantum mechanics is that small chunks of matter sometimes seem to behave like particles, sometimes like waves. For most of the past century, the prevailing explanation of this conundrum ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

baudrunner
2 / 5 (1) Feb 28, 2012
I like how the focus through the history of quantum computing has been on error-correction and data security. Reading between the lines tells me that they're needing OS programmers to take quantum computing processors beyond co-processing error correction chips and into the realm of full-fledged computer CPU's.
The special properties of qubits will allow quantum computers to work on millions of computations at once, while desktop PCs can typically handle minimal simultaneous computations. For example, a single 250-qubit state contains more bits of information than there are atoms in the universe.
You see, that's bait. But the reality is, how..?

They're up to it, though. Someday we might all have a billion-dollar quantum computer on our desktops.
baudrunner
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
So far, I can see that it is possible to load an operating system on to the same chip as that which contains all the necessary data. That is cool.
baudrunner
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
I can't stop thinking about this. So you've got an operating system loaded onto the chip that also contains the data. I guess you would then have to connect every q-bit to every other q-bit. That's just the beginning.
Lurker2358
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
For example, a single 250-qubit state contains more bits of information than there are atoms in the universe.


I still don't understand how they reach that conclusion, unless these are somehow analog Qubits.

After all, there are limits to what is "recoverable" in any form of coding.

If you treated the "both" state as representing a "2" and used base 3 logic, then 250 switches could represent 3^250, or 1.9E119 unique combinations.

There are, by my estimation, about 1.8E80 atoms in the universe, and if each was a classical bit, then binary represents as many combinations of data as the square of the real number of bits, then that would be 3.24E160 unique combinations, or about 1E40 times larger.

Not that it would matter, because I doubt we'd ever be smart enough to use the full potential of 250 Qubits' unique configurations.

But that's really not what they are doing anyway, but I'm just using it as a gauge, since there's no easy way to compare it.
Lurker2358
not rated yet Feb 28, 2012
But anyway, when you go to "recover" data from a Qubit, you see one of 3 stats: 0, 1, or "both".

"Both" does not work in comparisons or logical operations as far as sorting data, control structures, etc.

That being said, I think something is wrong with the article, or with everyone's understanding of quantum computing.

How could you possibly run a Weather Model on 250 qubits, since each qubit represents a unique piece of information, and there are more than 250 weather stations in the U.S. alone; 5000, I think.

It would clearly take more than 250 qubits to load the data from 5000 weather stations, not to mention radars.

The 250 qubits as a system have a maximum of 1.9E119 states, even with superposition, and the "system" can only be in one of those states at a time. The "system" cannot be in multiple states simultaneously, since the data would not be recoverable.
Resonance
Feb 28, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
hb_
not rated yet Feb 29, 2012
But they still have not been able to entagle more than a few qubits, right? How does the decoherence time change when the number of qubits are scaled up? A little more detail would have been interesting..