Google bypassed Apple privacy settings: researcher (Update)

Feb 17, 2012

Google was under fire Friday after it was revealed the Internet giant's ad-targeting "cookies" bypassed track-blocking software on Apple's web browser for iPhones and computers.

Snippets of code called "cookies" from Google three online ad specialty firms slipped past tracker-blocking safeguards on Apple's Safari browser, Stanford University graduate student Jonathan Mayer said Friday in a blog post.

"Some privacy researchers and advocates have characterized the interplay between third-party web trackers and browser privacy measures as a 'cat and mouse game' or 'arms race,'" Mayer said.

"This research result regrettably affirms that view as reality for, quite possibly, millions of users."

Safari is the most widely used browser on mobile devices and the default browser on iPhones and Macintosh computers. The Apple browsers are pre-set to block tracking cookies.

Google discontinued use of the offending cookies after Mayer's findings went public, and defended itself against outrage over what it characterized as an unintended side-effect of an effort to safeguard online privacy.

Google last year began using cookies in Safari browsers to let people signed into Google accounts get personalized services, such as being able "+1" ads or other online content as likeable for friends at its online social network.

Specialized cookies were crafted to be set temporarily in Safari browsers to check whether a user was signed into a Google account and had opted for personalized services such as social ads from DoubleClick.

The plan was purportedly to provide users personalization they requested while disclosing no information about them to Google-owned ad specialty firm DoubleClick.

Google reportedly did not realize was the presence of the cookies opened Safari browser doors to a slew of DoubleClick ad tracking cookies, which would otherwise have been rejected.

"The Safari browser contained functionality that then enabled other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser," the California company said in a released statement.

"We didn't anticipate that this would happen, and we have now started removing these advertising cookies from Safari browsers," it continued.

"It's important to stress that, just as on other browsers, these advertising cookies do not collect personal information."

US legislators and privacy advocates lashed out at Google, accusing the company of trampling on people's privacy and calling for an investigation.

"Google has clearly engaged in 'unfair and deceptive' practices," said Consumer Watchdog privacy project director John Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Privacy Project director.

"They have been lying about how people can protect their privacy in their instructions about how to opt out of receiving targeted advertising."

Consumer Watchdog fired off a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission calling for an investigtion.

"We are taking immediate steps to address concerns and we are happy to answer any questions regulators and others may have," a Google spokesman told AFP.

Senator John Rockefeller, chairman of the Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation, issued a statement vowing to look into how extensively Google and other firms circumvented do-not-track mechanisms in Safari browsers.

"Google knows the rules and simply chose not to follow them in this case," said Association for Competitive Technology president Jonathan Zuck.

"The ongoing irony is that these missteps, intentional or otherwise, invite regulatory action that doesn't hurt Google, but makes it harder for small business competitors to survive."

Explore further: Twitpic to stay alive with new owner

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Apple Announces Safari 4 Browser

Feb 24, 2009

Apple today announced the public beta of Safari 4 web browser for Mac and Windows PCs. The Nitro engine in Safari 4 runs JavaScript 4.2 times faster than Safari 3.

Google to launch online music service: report

May 10, 2011

Internet giant Google could launch an online music service as early as Tuesday to rival Amazon's "cloud" service, which allows users to store digital music online, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Senator calls for smartphone app privacy policies

May 25, 2011

(AP) -- A key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee is challenging Apple Inc. and Google Inc. to require all developers that make apps for their mobile devices to adopt formal privacy policies.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

Sep 17, 2014

Online ratings operator Yelp agreed to pay $450,000 to settle US charges that it illegally collected data on children, in violation of privacy laws, officials said Wednesday.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shifty0x88
5 / 5 (2) Feb 17, 2012
Don't have Wall Street Journal but from here: http://www.zdnet....rs/69747

The aim of the code was to allow users who had signed into Google+ in Safari to access the +1 button within ads, provided by Googles DoubleClick network.


Seems like they were trying to integrate their +1 in ads in Safari, which I don't see a problem with. If you have Google+ and you wanna +1 something, you know you are being tracked anyways... what's the harm? The fact that it exists?

For that matter, why was Safari(Apple) blocking it? Why can't Apple users +1 things?
gmurphy
not rated yet Feb 17, 2012
@Shifty0x88, I'm inclined to agree with you but that said, Google is just another corporation and their actions are motivated by profit not privacy.