Google bypassed Apple privacy settings: researcher (Update)

Feb 17, 2012

Google was under fire Friday after it was revealed the Internet giant's ad-targeting "cookies" bypassed track-blocking software on Apple's web browser for iPhones and computers.

Snippets of code called "cookies" from Google three online ad specialty firms slipped past tracker-blocking safeguards on Apple's Safari browser, Stanford University graduate student Jonathan Mayer said Friday in a blog post.

"Some privacy researchers and advocates have characterized the interplay between third-party web trackers and browser privacy measures as a 'cat and mouse game' or 'arms race,'" Mayer said.

"This research result regrettably affirms that view as reality for, quite possibly, millions of users."

Safari is the most widely used browser on mobile devices and the default browser on iPhones and Macintosh computers. The Apple browsers are pre-set to block tracking cookies.

Google discontinued use of the offending cookies after Mayer's findings went public, and defended itself against outrage over what it characterized as an unintended side-effect of an effort to safeguard online privacy.

Google last year began using cookies in Safari browsers to let people signed into Google accounts get personalized services, such as being able "+1" ads or other online content as likeable for friends at its online social network.

Specialized cookies were crafted to be set temporarily in Safari browsers to check whether a user was signed into a Google account and had opted for personalized services such as social ads from DoubleClick.

The plan was purportedly to provide users personalization they requested while disclosing no information about them to Google-owned ad specialty firm DoubleClick.

Google reportedly did not realize was the presence of the cookies opened Safari browser doors to a slew of DoubleClick ad tracking cookies, which would otherwise have been rejected.

"The Safari browser contained functionality that then enabled other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser," the California company said in a released statement.

"We didn't anticipate that this would happen, and we have now started removing these advertising cookies from Safari browsers," it continued.

"It's important to stress that, just as on other browsers, these advertising cookies do not collect personal information."

US legislators and privacy advocates lashed out at Google, accusing the company of trampling on people's privacy and calling for an investigation.

"Google has clearly engaged in 'unfair and deceptive' practices," said Consumer Watchdog privacy project director John Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Privacy Project director.

"They have been lying about how people can protect their privacy in their instructions about how to opt out of receiving targeted advertising."

Consumer Watchdog fired off a letter to the US Federal Trade Commission calling for an investigtion.

"We are taking immediate steps to address concerns and we are happy to answer any questions regulators and others may have," a Google spokesman told AFP.

Senator John Rockefeller, chairman of the Committee on Science, Commerce, and Transportation, issued a statement vowing to look into how extensively Google and other firms circumvented do-not-track mechanisms in Safari browsers.

"Google knows the rules and simply chose not to follow them in this case," said Association for Competitive Technology president Jonathan Zuck.

"The ongoing irony is that these missteps, intentional or otherwise, invite regulatory action that doesn't hurt Google, but makes it harder for small business competitors to survive."

Explore further: Bernanke forecasts gains from computer technology

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Apple Announces Safari 4 Browser

Feb 24, 2009

Apple today announced the public beta of Safari 4 web browser for Mac and Windows PCs. The Nitro engine in Safari 4 runs JavaScript 4.2 times faster than Safari 3.

Google to launch online music service: report

May 10, 2011

Internet giant Google could launch an online music service as early as Tuesday to rival Amazon's "cloud" service, which allows users to store digital music online, the Wall Street Journal reported.

Senator calls for smartphone app privacy policies

May 25, 2011

(AP) -- A key member of the Senate Judiciary Committee is challenging Apple Inc. and Google Inc. to require all developers that make apps for their mobile devices to adopt formal privacy policies.

Recommended for you

Bernanke forecasts gains from computer technology

10 hours ago

(AP)—Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says pessimists who are forecasting that the economy will not reap sizable benefits from the computer revolution are likely to be proven wrong.

Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million IDs stolen

13 hours ago

Yahoo Japan Corp. has said it suspects up to 22 million user IDs may have been stolen during an unauthorised attempt to access the administrative system of its Yahoo! Japan portal.

US seizes Bitcoin operator accounts

21 hours ago

US authorities seized the accounts of a Bitcoin digital currency exchange operator, claiming it was functioning as an "unlicensed money service business," court documents showed Friday.

Italian police raid hackers who took on Vatican

May 17, 2013

Italian police on Friday arrested four alleged hackers believed to belong to the activist group Anonymous for attacking websites, including those of the Vatican and the parliament in Rome.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shifty0x88
5 / 5 (2) Feb 17, 2012
Don't have Wall Street Journal but from here: http://www.zdnet....rs/69747

The aim of the code was to allow users who had signed into Google+ in Safari to access the +1 button within ads, provided by Googles DoubleClick network.


Seems like they were trying to integrate their +1 in ads in Safari, which I don't see a problem with. If you have Google+ and you wanna +1 something, you know you are being tracked anyways... what's the harm? The fact that it exists?

For that matter, why was Safari(Apple) blocking it? Why can't Apple users +1 things?
gmurphy
not rated yet Feb 17, 2012
@Shifty0x88, I'm inclined to agree with you but that said, Google is just another corporation and their actions are motivated by profit not privacy.

More news stories

US seizes Bitcoin operator accounts

US authorities seized the accounts of a Bitcoin digital currency exchange operator, claiming it was functioning as an "unlicensed money service business," court documents showed Friday.

Morocco to harness the wind in energy hunt

Morocco is ploughing ahead with a programme to boost wind energy production, particularly in the southern Tarfaya region, where Africa's largest wind farm is set to open in 2014.

Galaxy's Ring of Fire

Johnny Cash may have preferred this galaxy's burning ring of fire to the one he sang about falling into in his popular song. The "starburst ring" seen at center in red and yellow hues is not the product of ...

Alaska volcano shoots ash 15,000 feet into the air

(AP)—One of Alaska's most restless volcanoes has shot an ash cloud 15,000 feet into the air in an ongoing eruption that has drawn attention from a nearby community but isn't expected to threaten air traffic.