Fuel economy of new vehicles continues to rise: report

Feb 07, 2012 by Bernie DeGroat

(PhysOrg.com) -- The average fuel economy of current model year vehicles is 14 percent higher than just four years ago, say researchers at the University of Michigan.

For all 2012 light-duty vehicles (cars, pickup trucks, minivans, vans and SUVs) offered for sale, average is 21.5, compared to 18.9 mpg for model year 2008 vehicles. The averages were 21.2 for 2011, 20.7 for 2010 and 19 for 2009.

For new vehicles actually purchased, average fuel economy is typically one-to-two miles per gallon higher—22.5 mpg for model year 2011 (the last full year of sales), 22.1 for 2010, 21.3 for 2009 and 20.8 for 2008.

"This implies that consumers tend to choose models with better fuel economy than the average of all vehicles available," said Brandon Schoettle of the U-M Transportation Research Institute. "The recent economic downturn, coupled with rising gas prices, has led to an increased interest in purchasing more fuel-efficient vehicles."

Using data from the EPA, Schoettle and UMTRI colleague Michael Sivak also examined fuel economy changes by vehicle characteristics: cars vs. light trucks, vehicle class size, transmission type, number of engine cylinders, drive type, fuel type and hybrid vs. conventional vehicles.

They found that average fuel economy:

• Improved 2.8 mpg for cars (including station wagons) and 1.6 mpg for light trucks (pickups, minivans, vans and SUVs) from model year 2008 to model year 2012. • Average is currently 23.4 mpg for cars and 18.6 mpg for light trucks.

• Increased for all 12 vehicle-size classes between the 2008 and 2012 model years. The largest increases were 4.1 mpg for station wagons, which had the highest average 2012 rating of 26 mpg, and 3.8 mpg for compact cars, which had the second-highest average of 25.6 mpg. The smallest increases were 0.2 mpg for full-size vans, which had the lowest average 2012 rating of 13.4 mpg, and 0.4 mpg for small pickup trucks, which had the third-lowest average of 18.6 mpg.

• Increased 2.5 mpg for vehicles with automatic transmissions and 2.8 mpg for vehicles with manual transmissions; 2.3 mpg for four-cylinder engines and 1.4 mpg for six-cylinder engines; and 3.4 mpg for front-wheel drive vehicles and 2 mpg for four- or all-wheel drive vehicles from model year 2008 to model year 2012.

• Improved 9.8 mpg for diesel engines and 2.6 mpg for conventional gasoline engines, but dropped 3 mpg for hybrids, which are still more fuel-efficient overall than internal-combustion-only vehicles.

Explore further: Intel wireless charging in a bowl coming sooner than later

More information: Read the full report: deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/89864

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Fuel economy of new vehicles continues to rise

Dec 06, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Average fuel economy of all new vehicles sold in the United States is up for the second straight month, say researchers at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

Fuel economy of new vehicles slipped in December

Jan 11, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- After two months of increases, the average fuel economy of all new vehicles sold in the United States fell by a half mile per gallon last month, say researchers at the University of Michigan ...

Consumer Reports: Best, worst new cars for fuel economy

Jun 14, 2011

Although the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) assigns a fuel economy rating to all new vehicles, Consumer Reports magazine conducts its own independent testing. The magazine recently concluded testing on 2011 models ...

Recommended for you

Team improves solar-cell efficiency

Sep 19, 2014

New light has been shed on solar power generation using devices made with polymers, thanks to a collaboration between scientists in the University of Chicago's chemistry department, the Institute for Molecular ...

Calif. teachers fund to boost clean energy bets

Sep 19, 2014

The California State Teachers' Retirement System says it plans to increase its investments in clean energy and technology to $3.7 billion, from $1.4 billion, over the next five years.

Idealistic Norwegian sun trappers

Sep 19, 2014

The typical Norwegian owner of a solar heating system is a resourceful man in his mid-fifties. He is technically skilled, interested in energy systems, and wants to save money and protect the environment.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
5 / 5 (1) Feb 07, 2012
In other words, the fuel consumption of vehicles went down from 0.0529 gal/mi to 0.0465 gal/mi, which is a reduction of 12.1% in fuel consumption. What does that mean?

You go 14% further on a tank of fuel.
Or
You use 12% less for the same distance.

Percentages are funny like that. Which one you think should be reported? The bigger number that looks more impressive, or the smaller number that tells how much you actually save?

After some point, the MPG figures don't mean anything, because you have to keep doubling the number to shave another half off from your fuel consumption. Double the number to 40 MPG and you can say fuel economy has increased 100% from today's figures. Wow! How much do you save? Just half. That'd be roughly on par with the average car in Japan or Europe.

Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (1) Feb 07, 2012
Thank Gawad for Government Motors.