Time crystals could behave almost like perpetual motion machines

February 20, 2012 by Lisa Zyga report

time

Image by Sam Rohn, flickr.com/photos/nylocations/

(PhysOrg.com) -- As every young science student knows, moving objects have kinetic energy. But just how much energy does something need to move? In a new study, a pair of physicists has shown that it’s theoretically possible for a system in its lowest energy state, or ground state, to exhibit periodic motion. This periodically moving system can be thought of as the temporal equivalent of a crystal, which is defined by its spatial periodicity. What’s even more intriguing about these "time crystals" is that, by exhibiting motion at their state of lowest energy, they break a fundamental symmetry called time translation symmetry and become "perilously close" to looking like perpetual motion machines.

The physicists, Frank Wilczek of MIT (a 2004 Nobel Laureate) and Alfred Shapere of the University of Kentucky, have posted two papers on their novel idea of time crystals at arXiv.org. One paper focuses on classical time crystals, while the other looks at quantum time crystals.

Modern physics deals with many types of symmetry, but one of the most fundamental is time translation symmetry, which basically says that the laws of physics we have today should still be here tomorrow. Likewise, if a system’s features remain constant over time, that system obeys time translation symmetry. On the other hand, a clock, which has hands that are constantly moving, breaks time translation symmetry.

But while a clock requires a power source to break this symmetry, a system in its lowest energy state has no power source by definition. To show that such a system can indeed exhibit motion, Wilczek and Shapere performed some complex mathematical calculations, which revealed that a system in its lowest energy state could move in a periodic motion, such as a loop or orbit. As far as the scientists know, this is the first time that a system in its lowest without any external source of power has been shown to exhibit motion and break time translation symmetry.

As the physicists explained, this discovery doesn’t mean that such systems actually exist in nature, but that they can exist. At first, the were somewhat doubtful that they could exist at all, since such a system would behave very similar to a perpetual motion machine, the fantasy device that could run forever with no energy input. However, building such a system may actually be less improbable than showing that it can simply exist. As the scientists noted, under the right circumstances, a superconductor almost acts in this manner because ground-state electrons can continuously loop through it.

“It’s so tricky to implement mathematically,” Wilczek told PhysOrg.com. “It’s surprising that they can exist at all. But, whether or not they exist naturally, I’m very optimistic that it’s something one could engineer.”

He added that, even though time crystals might move continuously, they couldn’t be used to generate useful energy since they can’t be disturbed, and they wouldn’t violate the second law of thermodynamics. Nevertheless, the possibilities for time crystals are exciting, and the scientists plan to investigate them further in the future.

“There are many directions to go here,” Wilczek said. “The question is what to do first. ... One question is how this kind of idea might be realized in actual materials. What are the materials, how can we tell that it’s happening, what dimensions do the materials have? If this is a state of matter that’s different from other states, there could be phase transitions.”

“In the past, I’ve had some exciting episodes,” he said, referring to his earlier work on anyons, particles with such unusual properties that some people doubted they could exist. Evidence for anyons was finally detected in 2005. “It’s a strange, curious idea, and it will be interesting to see where it goes.”

More information: Alfred Shapere and Frank Wilczek. “Classical Time Crystals.” arXiv:1202.2537v1 [cond-mat.other]

Frank Wilczek. “Quantum Time Crystals.” arXiv:1202.2539v1 [quant-ph]

via: Science News

© 2011 PhysOrg.com

4.7 /5 (34 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (13)
Isn't any moving object - devoid of influence from other objects - a perpetual motion machine?

How about the electron in a hydrogen atom?

Planets orbiting a star?

Lurker2358
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (11)
Isn't any moving object - devoid of influence from other objects - a perpetual motion machine?

How about the electron in a hydrogen atom?

Planets orbiting a star?



Exactly what I thought of.

However, on closer inspection, those systems are imperfect and deteriorate over time due to various forces such as friction, frame dragging, etc.

but from my point of view, for all practical purposes, you are correct, those systems are and have always been perpetual motion machines.
TheGhostofOtto1923
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 2.2 / 5 (9)
How about this?

"Persistent current is a perpetual electrical current, not requiring an external power source, that flows naturally through resistive metal."
http://en.wikiped..._current
but from my point of view, for all practical purposes, you are correct, those systems are and have always been perpetual motion machines.
Which is as usual egocentrically myopic in the extreme. Planetary orbits decay from tidal forces. Electron orbits do not decay. Unless you have a source which says they do?
Megadeth312
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (10)
Perpetual motion machines must do work, an object simply spinning in space is not considered perpetual motion.

Lurker2358
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 3 / 5 (9)
How about this?

"Persistent current is a perpetual electrical current, not requiring an external power source, that flows naturally through resistive metal."
http://en.wikiped..._current
but from my point of view, for all practical purposes, you are correct, those systems are and have always been perpetual motion machines.
Which is as usual egocentrically myopic in the extreme. Planetary orbits decay from tidal forces. Electron orbits do not decay. Unless you have a source which says they do?


Allegedly, over obscenely long time periods they certainly decay, according to the mainstream model, because that ties into part of the "big freeze" theory of cosmology. All matter and energy eventually decay.

this is what all the big names in modern physics say anyway.

youtube.com/watch?v=zf2csQnE0jA

I tire of these games, Ghost.

I wonder whether you even bother to check this stuff for yourself, or if you've come to hypocritically rely on my integrity.
Callippo
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
Isn't every wave a sorta time crystal?
Vendicar_Decarian
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (9)
"However, on closer inspection, those systems are imperfect and deteriorate over time due to various forces such as friction, frame dragging, etc" - Lurker

The requirement of these "time crystals" is that they be isolated from their surroundings, such that their quantum state is not altered.

Applying the same limitations on atoms or planets produces the same perpetual motion results.
Vendicar_Decarian
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
The key concept behind the revelation in this article is that in the ground state a system can oscillate.

Given that individual particles are themselves characterized by temporal oscillations, I see nothing special here.
antialias_physorg
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
Allegedly, over obscenely long time periods they certainly decay,

They decay - but there's no friction, frame dragging or whatnot involved (and the orbitals don't shrink, either). Proton decay - if it exists - is a probabilistic process (i.e. it happens suddenly, but with a very low probability)

And no - this has nothing to do with the 'big freeze'. The big freeze can very well happen with atoms still in it. Atoms can be at 0 Kelvin and still remain atoms.
axemaster
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So when they say that it exhibits periodic motion, do they mean that in a classical sense, or in a quantum sense? I.e. is the expectation value of position changing periodically? The article really doesn't make that clear.
sherifffruitfly
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
"they wouldnt violate the second law of thermodynamics"

Please fire whoever writes your BS headlines. Immediately.

Sensationalistic headline deceit is for politics, not physics.
TheGhostofOtto1923
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
I tire of these games, Ghost.
And I tire of youre not knowing how to post a full link?
I wonder whether you even bother to check this stuff for yourself, or if you've come to hypocritically rely on my integrity.
I watched your vid. Nothing in there about decaying electron orbits nor why that might ever happen. Maybe you want to post something from the cosmos series? Or at something which says 'Electron orbits will eventually decay because...'
They decay - but there's no friction, frame dragging or whatnot involved (and the orbitals don't shrink, either).
-And sorry - even opinions from anonymous germans do not qualify as valid references.
Short bloke
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
The fundamental wave-particle duality of an electron.
Lurker2358
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Ghost:

Watch it again, you missed it.

Clearly, if the theory claims the entire universe will be made of nothing but photons, then all physical matter, including electrons, must decay.
antialias_physorg
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 4.6 / 5 (10)
-And sorry - even opinions from anonymous germans do not qualify as valid references.

I didn't mean that the orbitals get smaller or somesuch (they are quantized). I meant that protons possibly decay. If they do then the atoms they were a part of will eventually decay (i.e. fall apart). This is a sudden event...not some slow 'spiralling in' of electrons (which is a wrong picture, anyways, because electrons do not orbit nuclei the way moons orbit planets)
javjav
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
A system in its lowest energy state can not exist forever, it is a human concept that do not exist in reality. Not only because of particle decay, also because electrons and other particles are not 100% localized, and virtual particles can also appear and interact with it.
Birthmark
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
Interesting.
Could we eventually harness the power of their kinetic energy?
antialias_physorg
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (11)
From the article:
He added that, even though time crystals might move continuously, they couldnt be used to generate useful energy since they cant be disturbed, and they wouldnt violate the second law of thermodynamics.

So the answer would be: No.
Deesky
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
this has nothing to do with the 'big freeze'. The big freeze can very well happen with atoms still in it. Atoms can be at 0 Kelvin and still remain atoms.

Maybe so, but we'll never know as absolute zero temperature is unachievable.
Isaacsname
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
How about this?

"Persistent current is a perpetual electrical current, not requiring an external power source, that flows naturally through resistive metal."
http://en.wikiped..._current
but from my point of view, for all practical purposes, you are correct, those systems are and have always been perpetual motion machines.
Which is as usual egocentrically myopic in the extreme. Planetary orbits decay from tidal forces. Electron orbits do not decay. Unless you have a source which says they do?


I'm sorry, what ?

http://en.wikiped...-PAR.svg

You are looking for a slow spiral or something Newtonian ?
animah
Feb 20, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Great work.

Quick question: The 2nd law depends on closed systems. Do closed systems really translate from math to modern physics where a particle is always unavoidably exposed to vacuum energy and quantum foam?
Urgelt
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The subject matter has nothing to do with "perpetual motion machines." Even as analogy, it fails utterly to connect to the subject.

Forgivable, perhaps. We don't know how much sleep the writer was missing. But don't do it again.
Thecis
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Planets around a sun DO have friction. Although the "vaccuum" in space is rather empty, it isn't exactly a vaccuum. Also, earth is slowed down by meteorites. Although all these contributions (friction and added mass) you do see a loss in velocity (over the billions and billions of years).

Regarding the electron around a atom core. Bohr suggested a planetary system to describe this. Due to the speed electrons would immediatly throw themselves into the atom core because of the centrigual force (I might state it politically incorect, therefore my apologies).
Clearly, this doesn't happen. Why? Because newtonian physics do not apply anymore and we need to use quantum physics. The electron is equally distributed at a certain distant (1s orbital) and if it a probability distribution, meaning it is likely to find the electron somewhere over there, but it can't be exactly pinpointed.
That is why the atom-system is not a perpetuum mobile system =perpetual motion machine in newtion physics
Vendicar_Decarian
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
"Even as analogy, it fails utterly to connect to the subject." - Urgelt

It was a minor point of contention. But even the intended meaning of the article is not news.

cps
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
Wouldn't a photon count as a time crystal?
antonima
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
How about this?

"Persistent current is a perpetual electrical current, not requiring an external power source, that flows naturally through resistive metal."
http://en.wikiped..._current
but from my point of view, for all practical purposes, you are correct, those systems are and have always been perpetual motion machines.
Which is as usual egocentrically myopic in the extreme. Planetary orbits decay from tidal forces. Electron orbits do not decay. Unless you have a source which says they do?


How about this-

http://en.wikiped...ysics%29
"dark current is the relatively small electric current that flows through photosensitive devices such as a photomultiplier tube, photodiode, or charge-coupled device even when no photons are entering the device ... dark current flows due to the random generation of electrons and holes within the depletion region of the device that are then swept by the high electric field"
antonima
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
If the particle they have theorized is truly stable, as being in the lowest energy state would imply, then it may be a first of its kind. It wouldn't be the first case of one of the fundamental symmetries having an exception.
WhiteJim
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
"perpetual motion machine" is different than something having "perpetual motion". Everything has perpetual motion as it is now... in fact everything is not only in perpetual moton its perpetually accelerating to boot...
TheGhostofOtto1923
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Ghost:

Watch it again, you missed it.

Clearly, if the theory claims the entire universe will be made of nothing but photons, then all physical matter, including electrons, must decay.
No, clearly there are other ways for matter to turn into photons. Matter collapses into black holes and those eventually evaporate, as your movie states.

Please provide evidence for the decay of electron orbits or STFU.
axemaster
Feb 21, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
A system in its lowest energy state can not exist forever, it is a human concept that do not exist in reality.

Actually it can. It's a mathematical concept, and thus not dependent in any way on human thinking.
antialias_physorg
Feb 22, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Wouldn't a photon count as a time crystal?

Tricky, because from the point of view of a photon no time passes. To it the event of emission and of being captured are simultaneous (this even goes if the photon isn't captured, ever, again (!))


How about this-

http://en.wikiped...ysics%29
"dark current is the relatively small electric current that flows

What about it? You have an external voltage (power source) along which the charged particles (electrons, holes) flow.
The dark current gets less the cooler you make your photomultiplier. This is why many infrared/photomultiplier detector systems are cooled (e.g. military targetting systems or infrared telescopes)

Dark current is a probabilistic occurence. A system that has a temperature above absolute zero contains some (thermal) energy. But that energy isn't (at all times) spread perfectly evenly throughout the system. If enough of it (by chance) happens to be at one point an electron can be liberated from its atom.
Isaacsname
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Great work.

Quick question: The 2nd law depends on closed systems. Do closed systems really translate from math to modern physics where a particle is always unavoidably exposed to vacuum energy and quantum foam?


http://en.wikiped..._theorem
Anda
Feb 23, 2012

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Nothing here about perpetual motion machines. You're all discussing because of a title that is wrong.
juanko
Feb 24, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
my roomate's aunt makes $83/hr on the laptop. She has been without work for 8 months but last month her pay was $8682 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Read more on this site...NuttyRichdotcom
camel
Feb 24, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
a friend's sister-in-law makes $65 hourly on the laptop. She has been laid off for 6 months but last month her pay was $19426 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Go to this web site and read more NuttyRich dot com
mauro48it
Feb 25, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
posso immaginare un materiale con una perfetta elasticitą, similmente ad un materiale con perfetta conducibilitą elettrica.
Questo materiale, sebbene perfettamente isolato dall'ambiente circostante, potrebbe essere sede di vibrazioni meccaniche perpetue.
Sarebbe questo un time cristal?
Forse cercavi: posso immaginare un materiale con una perfetta elasticitą, similmente ad un materiale con perfetta conducibilitą elettrica.
Digita il testo o l'indirizzo di un sito web oppure traduci un documento.
Annulla
ingleseitalianospagnoloAlpha
I can imagine a material with a perfect elasticity, similar to a material with perfect electrical conductivity.
This material, though perfectly isolated from the environment, could be the site of perpetual mechanical vibrations.
This would be a time crystal?
ECOnservative
Feb 25, 2012

Rank: not rated yet
How is this different from Planck scale "jitter" as currently being proposed to be tested with the Holometer? At the Planck scale, time, energy and matter are supposedly the same thing, at least in theory.
Lurker2358
Feb 26, 2012

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No, clearly there are other ways for matter to turn into photons. Matter collapses into black holes and those eventually evaporate, as your movie states.

Please provide evidence for the decay of electron orbits or STFU.


http://arxiv.org/.../0312325

and

http://en.wikiped...operties
antonima
Feb 26, 2012

Rank: not rated yet

What about it? You have an external voltage (power source) along which the charged particles (electrons, holes) flow.
The dark current gets less the cooler you make your photomultiplier. This is why many infrared/photomultiplier detector systems are cooled (e.g. military targetting systems or infrared telescopes)


In basic physics, a voltage does not necessarily require a power source, however that may not be the case with how a photodiode works.

Dark current is a probabilistic occurence. A system that has a temperature above absolute zero contains some (thermal) energy. But that energy isn't (at all times) spread perfectly evenly throughout the system. If enough of it (by chance) happens to be at one point an electron can be liberated from its atom.


Right, the point is that this thermal energy can theoretically do some tiny amount of work through this dark current, even though it actually impedes usefulness in real thermal imaging devices.
Rank 4.7 /5 (34 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (18) | comments 43 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (24) | comments 55 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.