Climate change: French researchers complete new simulations for the next IPCC report

Feb 14, 2012
Changes in the Earth's surface temperature for the period 2071-2100 compared with the period 1971-2000, calculated using the CNRM-CERFACS and IPSL models for scenario RCP4.5 (moderate). Credit: Patrick Brockmann (LSCE/IPSL, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ)

The French climatology community, which includes CNRS, Météo-France, the CEA, UPMC and UVSQ, has just completed a major exercise in the simulation of past and future climate conditions on a global scale. This new body of data confirms the conclusions of the most recent report by the IPCC(2007) on future changes in temperature and rainfall. By 2100, average global temperatures are expected to rise by 3.5 to 5°C according to the most unfavorable scenario, or 2°C according to the most optimistic projections. This study has been made available to the international community, and will be used by the IPCC in its next report, to be released in 2013. It provides information on likely climate conditions and trends at the end of the century and, for the first time, over the next 30 years as well.

The IPCC was formed for the purpose of gathering and summarizing all the available scientific information on , its impact and solutions for countering or adapting to it. The first section of its fifth report, to be published in mid-September 2013, will give an update on the new findings compiled in recent years. Just as for the 2007 edition, the international scientific community has joined forces, in particular through the WCRP, to define and carry out an exercise to simulate past and future climate conditions, called the CMIP-5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project).

This ongoing research effort, which requires vast resources in terms of manpower, computing power and data storage capacity, involves more than 20 climatology centers around the world and the development of some 50 digital models. In France, many organizations are contributing to the project, in particular through the CNRM, in association with CERFACS and IPSL.

The CMIP-5 project introduces a number of innovations in relation to the previous exercises:

• The inclusion of scenarios that incorporate climate policies intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions;
• The use of models that are both more complex (for the better integration of factors like aerosols, the carbon cycle, etc.) and more precise (for better resolution);
• An in-depth evaluation of the models' capacity to reproduce past climate conditions and the mechanisms that underlie their evolution;
• A series of “retrospective forecasts” for the past 50 years, as well as a preliminary forecast exercise for the period between 2010 and 2035.

Findings of the French simulations

In keeping with the IPCC's conclusions of 2007, all scenarios predict a trend toward higher temperatures between now and 2100. The severity of the rise varies depending on the scenario under consideration, reaching 3.5 to 5°C for the most unfavorable but only 2°C for the most optimistic — a scenario that depends on the successful implementation of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, it seems that natural factors alone cannot explain the average global warming observed since the second half of the 20th century.

The new simulations confirm an intensification of the hydrological cycle and the rapid melting of the Arctic ice cap. According to the most pessimistic scenario, the Arctic Sea will be totally ice-free in the summer by 2040 or 2060, depending on the model.

Some new responses are offered by the simulations that link climate conditions to the carbon cycle. In particular, they make it clear that anthropogenic emissions must be rapidly reduced in order to reach “negative” emissions (i.e. a level of anthropogenic activity that makes it possible to draw CO2 directly from the atmosphere) by the end of the 21st century.

The analyses of this set of simulations, in combination with simulations by other international research groups, will shed new light on the link between human activity and climate change, both in the past several decades and, more importantly, in the decades and centuries to come.

Explore further: NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

2C warming goal now 'optimistic' - French scientists

Feb 09, 2012

French scientists unveiling new estimates for global warming said on Thursday the 2 C (3.6 F) goal enshrined by the United Nations was "the most optimistic" scenario left for greenhouse-gas emissions.

New carbon dioxide emissions model

Aug 02, 2010

Meteorologists have determined exactly how much carbon dioxide humans can emit into the atmosphere while ensuring that the Earth does not heat up by more than two degrees.

Models look good when predicting climate change

Apr 02, 2008

The accuracy of computer models that predict climate change over the coming decades has been the subject of debate among politicians, environmentalists and even scientists. A new study by meteorologists at the University ...

Recommended for you

Sculpting tropical peaks

7 hours ago

Tropical mountain ranges erode quickly, as heavy year-round rains feed raging rivers and trigger huge, fast-moving landslides. Rapid erosion produces rugged terrain, with steep rivers running through deep ...

Volcano expert comments on Japan eruption

8 hours ago

Loÿc Vanderkluysen, PhD, who recently joined Drexel as an assistant professor in Department of Biodiversity, Earth and Environmental Science in the College of Arts and Sciences, returned Friday from fieldwork ...

NASA's HS3 looks Hurricane Edouard in the eye

21 hours ago

NASA and NOAA scientists participating in NASA's Hurricane and Severe Storms Sentinel (HS3) mission used their expert skills, combined with a bit of serendipity on Sept. 17, 2014, to guide the remotely piloted ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rubberman
4.2 / 5 (5) Feb 14, 2012
The most pessimistic scenario has the earliest ice free arctic in 2040....

http://thinkprogr...iththat/

Ordinarily I wouldn't link a personal opinion page, but he quotes Wieslaw Maslowski's work which, based on his credentials and track record for accuracy, make him a valid source.
Vendicar_Decarian
4.2 / 5 (5) Feb 15, 2012
How can that be when Antony Watts of WattsUpWithThat has been paid tens of thousands of dollars from the Libertarian propaganda group the Heartland Institute to among other dishonest things, claim that there has been no change to the arctic sea ice volume in the last decade?

Perhaps our resident Libertarians can explain why there is so much rampant dishonesty coming from their trademark propaganda groups - Hertland, Cato, AEI, CEI, etc.

http://www.desmog...strategy
rubberman
4.2 / 5 (5) Feb 15, 2012
It would be interesting to track the bank accounts of AGW deniers who are in the public eye and vocalize "their" view in an attempt to sow the seeds of doubt. Some people put money above personal integrity I guess.....
Howhot
5 / 5 (4) Feb 15, 2012
I've always suspected that some of the people I've encountered on Physorg where paid for trolls trying to astro-turf climate change issues, specifically with pro-coal radicals.

Here is a very good article on the subject;

http://arstechnic...well.ars

You now the freepers have hammer climate scientist with phoney charges with the leaked emails episode. The turn around seems like fair play to me, if not poetic justice.

The slime.

Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (4) Feb 16, 2012
Heritage is just of several hundered libertarian propaganda groups that exist in America whose purpose is to lie to the American people on a wide range of subjects for the purpose of advancing the fascist takeover of America by Corporate interests.
Howhot
5 / 5 (3) Feb 16, 2012
I agree VD, it is amazing how many rightest single issue "groups" these people put into there portfolios. It's not just global warming, but a whole range of topics. I really is a corporate take over the voices of reason.

Damn, one of the skeptic physicist was paided to make scientific sounding shit up at $600,000 a year? That is over the top.
rubberman
5 / 5 (4) Feb 17, 2012
Nice article on the leaked heartland documents. I'd love to know who the 14 million dollar contributor is. The sad reality is that these guys actually believe that they can make something go away by denying it's happening...
600,000 grand a year? That is just stupid.