BP says US oil spill trial could 'last until 2014'

Feb 26, 2012
Thick oil from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill floats on the surface of the water in Bay Jimmy near Port Sulphur, Louisiana in June 2010. British energy giant BP is prepared for a multi-billion-dollar US legal case into the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill to last until 2014, its chief executive has told the Sunday Telegraph.

British energy giant BP is prepared for a multi-billion-dollar US legal case into the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill to last until 2014, its chief executive told the Sunday Telegraph.

The London-listed company heads to a US court on Monday in an attempt to determine how much it owes for the oil spill catastrophe and how much it can shift to subcontractors.

"We have to remember we are a business that invests in decade-long cycles," BP chief executive Bob Dudley told the weekly newspaper.

"If (the trial) goes to 2013 or 2014, in the history of BP and the way the energy industry works, we just have to think much longer term.

"Hopefully we will reach some agreements and we will be able to reduce the uncertainty and move forward.

"But the appeals process has various different branches it could go down in terms of time, so it could be a lot longer than that (2014)."

Dudley added that that group had overhauled its safety procedures since the 2010 disaster.

"I think we are now using the toughest standards in the world for floating drilling rigs everywhere," he told the Sunday Telegraph.

"People realise we are serious. I believe that you cannot come out of an accident like this without a sense of responsibility to change. I do believe the will change, just like in any industry after you have a terrible industrial accident."

Several government probes have castigated BP, rig operator and Halliburton -- which was responsible for the runaway well's faulty cement job -- for cutting corners and missing that could have prevented the disaster.

The April 20, 2010, explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon killed 11 workers, blackened beaches in five US states and devastated the Gulf Coast's tourism and fishing industries.

It is now up to a federal judge to determine whether the deadly missteps constitute gross negligence, how much of the blame rests with each party and whether punitive damages should be imposed.

Explore further: Climate rhetoric faces devil in the detail at Lima talks

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US eyes first BP criminal charges over Gulf spill: WSJ

Dec 29, 2011

US prosecutors are readying criminal charges against British oil giant BP employees over the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident that led to the catastrophic Gulf oil spill, The Wall Street Journal reported online.

US report spreads blame for BP oil spill

Sep 14, 2011

A key US government report spreads the blame for the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico Wednesday, citing a bad cement job and poor management decisions by BP and its subcontractors.

BP, Transocean, Halliburton cited for violations

Oct 13, 2011

The US government slapped BP, Transocean and Halliburton with citations for violating oil industry regulations in what is expected to lead to massive fines for the deadly 2010 oil spill.

Recommended for you

Gold rush an ecological disaster for Peruvian Amazon

18 hours ago

A lush expanse of Amazon rainforest known as the "Mother of God" is steadily being destroyed in Peru, with the jungle giving way to mercury-filled tailing ponds used to extract the gold hidden underground.

Australia out of step with new climate momentum

20 hours ago

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who rose to power in large part by opposing a tax on greenhouse gas emissions, is finding his country isolated like never before on climate change as the U.S., China ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
3 / 5 (2) Feb 26, 2012

"Several government probes have castigated BP, rig operator Transocean and Halliburton -- which was responsible for the runaway well's faulty cement job -- for cutting corners and missing warning signs that could have prevented the disaster.

The April 20, 2010, explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon drilling rig killed 11 workers, blackened beaches in five US states and devastated the Gulf Coast's tourism and fishing industries.

constitute gross negligence, how much of the blame rests with each party and whether punitive damages should be imposed."


Of course there was negligence. ANY shortcuts or attempts to advance through the process without verification of successful completion of the previous step --especially under those conditions-- is, by defininition, RISK, and under the circumstances, very clearly constitutes negligence of duty.

contd

Caliban
3 / 5 (2) Feb 26, 2012
contd

So, I'll put in a context that everyone can understand:

I'm behind schedule getting to a very important meeting. Triply so, because I'm driving the carpool that also comprises two other members of the working group that are essential to the purpose of this meeting.
They keep telling me to "Step on it!", and "To hell with the speed limit--we've got to be there in three minutes!".

The Trooper hits his lights when he clocks me at 75mph.

While I'm looking for a place to pull over I don't see the car before me braking. Rear-end collision. The other car goes spinning into the next lane, causing a gasoline tank truck to swerve, jackknife, and roll. I am unable to avoid colliding with it as it ruptures. Explosion and fire. I'm miraculously thrown free, virtually unscathed. My two coworkers and eight others are burned horribly, some take a few days to die. Numerous other injuries result, and Massive property damages...

The Judge wouldn't even pause at mere negligence...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.