Scientists create first free-standing 3-D cloak

Jan 26, 2012
Scientists create first free-standing 3-D cloak

Researchers in the US have, for the first time, cloaked a three-dimensional object standing in free space, bringing the much-talked-about invisibility cloak one step closer to reality.

Whilst previous studies have either been theoretical in nature or limited to the cloaking of two-dimensional objects, this study shows how ordinary objects can be cloaked in their natural environment in all directions and from all of an observer's positions.

Published today, 26 January, in the , the researchers used a method known as "plasmonic cloaking" to hide an 18-centimetre cylindrical tube from microwaves.

Some of the most recent breakthroughs in the field of invisibility cloaking have focussed on using transformation-based metamaterials — inhomogeneous, man-made materials that have the ability to bend light around objects — however, this new approach uses a different type of artificial material — plasmonic metamaterials.

When light strikes an object, it rebounds off its surface towards another direction, just like throwing a tennis ball against a wall. The reason we see objects is because light rays bounce off materials towards our eyes and our eyes are able to process the information.

Due to their unique properties, plasmonic metamaterials have the opposite scattering effect to everyday materials.

"When the scattered fields from the and the object interfere, they cancel each other out and the overall effect is transparency and invisibility at all angles of observation.

"One of the advantages of the plasmonic cloaking technique is its robustness and moderately broad bandwidth of operation, superior to conventional cloaks based on metamaterials. This made our experiment more robust to possible imperfections, which is particularly important when cloaking a 3D object in ," said study co-author Professor Andrea Alu.

In this instance, the cylindrical tube was cloaked with a shell of plasmonic metamaterial to make it appear invisible. The system was tested by directing microwaves towards the cloaked cylinder and mapping the resulting scattering both around the object and in the far-field. The cloak showed optimal functionality when the were at a frequency of 3.1 gigahertz and over a moderately broad bandwidth.

The researchers, from the University of Texas at Austin, have shown in previous studies that the shape of the object is irrelevant; oddly shaped and asymmetric objects can both be cloaked using this technique.

Moving forward, one of the key challenges for the researchers will be to demonstrate the cloaking of a 3D object using visible light.

"In principle, this technique could be used to cloak light; in fact, some plasmonic materials are naturally available at optical frequencies. However, the size of the objects that can be efficiently cloaked with this method scales with the wavelength of operation, so when applied to optical frequencies we may be able to efficiently stop the scattering of micrometre-sized objects.

"Still, cloaking small objects may be exciting for a variety of applications. For instance, we are currently investigating the application of these concepts to cloak a microscope tip at . This may greatly benefit biomedical and optical near-field measurements," continued Professor Alu.

Explore further: The risks of blowing your own trumpet too soon on research

More information: The published version of the paper "Experimental verification of 3D plasmonic cloaking in free-space" Rainwater D et al 2012 New J. Phys. 14 013054 is freely available at iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/14/1/013054

Related Stories

Researchers create first 3D invisibility cloak

Aug 11, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Science has taken one more step towards creating a true real-life cloaking device. Assistant Professor Andrea Alůin and his colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin have successfully ...

New invisibility cloak hides objects from human view

Jul 27, 2011

For the first time, scientists have devised an invisibility cloak material that hides objects from detection using light that is visible to humans. The new device is a leap forward in cloaking materials, according to a report ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

tkjtkj
1 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2012
and so one is forced to ask : just where are the pics??? If our eyes cant see it, then one presumes that film or CCD's cant see it either!
A before/after pair of photo's would be 'enlightening by delightening' ;)
nothingness
4 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2012
that looks "shopped"
Llewellian
not rated yet Jan 26, 2012
@Tkjtkj: Read the text. Invisible in the Microwave part of the Spectrum. Of course it would still be visible by your eyes or a camera. This is just the slightly more advanced Version of a current Stealth-bomber. Visible with the eyes but nearly invisble to a radar...
Deathclock
not rated yet Jan 26, 2012
and so one is forced to ask : just where are the pics??? If our eyes cant see it, then one presumes that film or CCD's cant see it either!
A before/after pair of photo's would be 'enlightening by delightening' ;)


It doesn't work in the visible spectrum...
GSwift7
1 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2012
There are many practical applications of cloaking very small objects. Think of computers, for example. One limit on the size of storage and transistors is that you get EM interference between adjacent storage/processing units. If you can cloak each storage/processing unit in certain frequency ranges, then you can pack them closer together. Similarly, the read/write head of a magnetic disk drive could write much smaller bits if you could cloak it just on the sides so that it won't damage adjacent storage bits when reading/writing. You wouldn't even need a 100% effective cloak to achieve gains in these areas. 50% would help a TON.

Perhaps in the far distant future, you could also use limited frequency cloaking to shield astronauts and sattelites from harmful radiation in space, which does peak at specific frequency ranges. You would only need to cloak parts of the craft, not the whole thing. Maybe just a helmet for the astronauts would be enough, for example. Who knows?
tkjtkj
5 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2012
Yes, forgive my missing the 'microwave only' point ..
At same time, pics of the objects
used would be interesting. Perhaps my (predjudiced!) slant against Physorg (based on its editors' common practice of omitting pics) got a hold of me!
Appologies to all .. and i promise to renew my eyeglass perscription!
vlaaing peerd
not rated yet Jan 30, 2012
hahaha eat that you stupid Klingons!