Leaked documents indicate EU looking to reclassify carbon emissions from biofuels

Jan 30, 2012 by Bob Yirka weblog
Oil palm plantation on the slopes of Mt. Cameroon. Image: Wikipedia.

(PhysOrg.com) -- In order to wean themselves from their dependence on oil derived from fossil fuels, many countries, consortiums, and other groups have put incentives in place for the growing of plants that could be used to create biofuels. Brazil is one example, they have converted much of their infrastructure to using fuel made from sugar cane. The United States is another example; the government offered subsidies and tax advantages for farmers who grow corn, to promote the production of ethanol. In Europe, the EU back in 2009 enacted laws that stipulated that renewable energy sources such as those derived from plants should make up a minimum of 10% of all fuels used for transportation purposes in the Eurozone by 2020. Unfortunately, it appears, according to a leaked report obtained by EurActiv, that the EU believes initial environmental impact reports were flawed and as a result the governing body is about to revise its estimates regarding the true environmental impact; a move that could have a major implications regarding the future of biofuel use in Europe.

The problem with suddenly switching from one energy source to another is it’s tricky to see in advance what sorts of incidental actions might occur. In the United States, for example, the sudden increase in land being used for corn production for use as a biofuel led to food price spikes all over the world. In Europe, the problem is when biofuels are made from palm oil, land that was once being used to grow food in countries such as in Malyasia, suddenly is converted to produce palm oil (because can make more money) meaning new land must be made available for growing food. And that’s where the environmental impact comes in. Cutting down forests to grow those food crops adds significantly to the carbon footprint of the biofuels made from palm oil. Such a scenario is known as an Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC).

Specifically, the report says, when ILUC is taken into account, biofuels made from palm oil, soybeans and rapeseed, actually produce more greenhouse gas emissions than do . To arrive at these findings, the EU uses an equation derived from a variety of factors to obtain a measurement based on grams of carbon dioxide produced per megajoule of energy. In the report, for example, palm oil is rated at 105g, whereas gasoline is less than 90g. At the top of the list is oil pulled from the tar sand pits in Canada (107g) likely one of the reasons President Obama recently nixed the pipeline that was supposed to ship it south through the United States.
While it’s not yet known what impact this report will have on use in Europe, it’s likely the EU will make some changes to the legislation passed just three years ago, tipping perhaps towards solar, wind or even nuclear power to address the ever growing energy needs of a thirsty European Union.

Explore further: Is nuclear power the only way to avoid geoengineering?

Related Stories

The pluses and (mostly) minuses of biofuels

Feb 23, 2009

Speakers at last week’s AAAS meeting presented abundant evidence that tropical rainforest destruction has accelerated in recent years, at least in part because of the worldwide push to produce more biofuels.

British government to require biofuels

Nov 07, 2005

The British government will reportedly soon require oil companies to blend a fixed proportion of biofuels into the gasoline and diesel fuel they produce.

EU sets tight biofuel standards

Jun 10, 2010

(AP) -- The European Union's top energy official set out tough standards for producing biofuels sold in the EU, demanding producers meet strict environmental criteria.

Recommended for you

US urged to drop India WTO case on solar

13 hours ago

Environmentalists Wednesday urged the United States to drop plans to haul India to the WTO to open its solar market, saying the action would hurt the fight against climate change.

Is nuclear power the only way to avoid geoengineering?

21 hours ago

"I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering." So says Tom Wigley, one ...

Finalists named in Bloomberg European city contest

Apr 23, 2014

Amsterdam wants to create an online game to get unemployed young people engaged in finding jobs across Europe. Schaerbeek, Belgium, envisions using geothermal mapping to give households personalized rundowns of steps to save ...

Bloomberg invests $5M in solar-powered lamp

Apr 22, 2014

Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's foundation has announced a $5 million investment in an artsy-looking solar-powered lamp designed for use in off-grid populations in Africa.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Feldagast
2.1 / 5 (11) Jan 30, 2012
And all this from false claims of man made global warming. New report out that the earth is cooling due to less output from the sun. So after rigging data that can no longer be obtained because of lousy record keeping and predicting global warming for years, they change their tune and now predict a possible return of a mini-ice age. Are they going to get their boot heals off the industries that they have put into serious trouble? Now that their claims have been shown to be false are they going to loose all their taxpayer grants? Reducing emissions purely for the sake of cleaning up pollution I can agree with, doing it for political and capitol gain really is almost criminal.
Noumenon
2 / 5 (8) Jan 30, 2012
Climate science is just messy enough that the next generation will over turn the previous. We already saw this in the 70's.
CapitalismPrevails
1.7 / 5 (11) Jan 30, 2012
Climate Gate again it looks like.
RitchieGuy
1.7 / 5 (6) Jan 30, 2012
physyD
2 / 5 (4) Jan 31, 2012
"is oil pulled from the tar sand pits in Canada " Please use technically correct term. It is oil sands not tar sands. The process used in Canada to get the oil is literally hot water washing of the dirt. Tar is formed by a type of distillation of oil, either done artificially or naturally (like La Brea in california) and that is not what is being processed. Accuracy is important, whether for or against.
rawa1
2 / 5 (4) Jan 31, 2012
Biofuels are most environmentally unfriendly source of energy, despite of their seeming recoverability. Their impact to economy and life environment can be really devastating. For example the same plant can be harvested from one place just few years, after then the soil becomes exhausted and without fertilization it changes into desert.

More news stories

SK Hynix posts Q1 surge in net profit

South Korea's SK Hynix Inc said Thursday its first-quarter net profit surged nearly 350 percent from the previous year on a spike in sales of PC memory chips.

FCC to propose pay-for-priority Internet standards

The Federal Communications Commission is set to propose new open Internet rules that would allow content companies to pay for faster delivery over the so-called "last mile" connection to people's homes.

Brazil enacts Internet 'Bill of Rights'

Brazil's president signed into law on Wednesday a "Bill of Rights" for the digital age that aims to protect online privacy and promote the Internet as a public utility by barring telecommunications companies ...

Is nuclear power the only way to avoid geoengineering?

"I think one can argue that if we were to follow a strong nuclear energy pathway—as well as doing everything else that we can—then we can solve the climate problem without doing geoengineering." So says Tom Wigley, one ...

When things get glassy, molecules go fractal

Colorful church windows, beads on a necklace and many of our favorite plastics share something in common—they all belong to a state of matter known as glasses. School children learn the difference between ...

FDA proposes first regulations for e-cigarettes

The federal government wants to prohibit sales of electronic cigarettes to minors and require approval for new products and health warning labels under regulations being proposed by the Food and Drug Administration.