Internet name 'revolution' hits doubts

Jan 10, 2012 by Tim Witcher
President and chief executive officer of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), Rod Beckstrom, pictured in 2011. The body that polices Internet registrations will on Thursday launch a domain name "revolution" in the face of the concerns of global bodies ranging from the United Nations to the US Congress.

The body that polices Internet registrations will on Thursday launch a domain name "revolution" in the face of the concerns of global bodies ranging from the United Nations to the US Congress.

The Red Cross and International Olympic Committee have already secured exclusions from the new sector that would allow company, organization and city names to rival .com as Internet addresses.

The head of the Zulus in southern Africa and a wealthy Middle East family have already expressed an interest in being part of what Rod Beckstrom, president of the (), has called a "new domain name system revolution".

The new generic (GTLDs) would allow Internet names such as .Apple or .IMF or .Paris instead of .com or .org.

ICANN says the huge expansion of the Internet, with two billion users around the world, half of them in Asia, requires the new names.

But the was among more than 25 global bodies which sent a letter to ICANN last month expressing concern about the possible "misleading registration and use" of their names.

The US Association of National Advertisers and non-profit groups such as the Young Men's Christian Association, YMCA, criticized the plan at a hearing last month.

They fear it could cause confusion about their Internet presence and force them to spend huge amounts on "defensive registration" to stop cybersquatters, who buy up names and try to sell them at an inflated price, and fraudsters.

Registration will cost $185,000 with a $25,000 annual fee after that.

Beckstrom acknowledged that providing servers and other technical and administrative backup means that the name could cost millions over the course of a decade.

But he calls the new generics "the most significant opening in the history of the ." The aggregate number of new sites "might very well rival dot.com in 10 years time," Beckstrom said ahead of the launch.

He estimates there are now more than 220 million Internet site names, and more than 90 million of them are .com.

ICANN insists however that safeguards are in place to protect the big names the scheme is aimed at.

Jamie Hedlund, ICANN vice president for government affairs, said that while the names of international organizations are not trademarks, they would get the same protection if they are mentioned in international treaties.

If "someone applies for .unitednations, they will have lost their $185,000 application fee because they don't have the right to that name," Hedlund told reporters.

The International Olympic Committee and International Red Cross secured an opt-out meaning their names could not be registered after talks with ICANN, he said. Other international bodies had not reacted so quickly, he added.

However Beckstrom said ICANN is "very sensitive" to the concerns raised by the international organizations last month. "We'll be responding to that letter," he said.

If anyone applied for one of the top-level domains using a known trademark or service mark, the owner could complain to a panel of intellectual property experts, who would decide who had rights to the term.

"If they have no rights to that term, you are in an extremely good position," the ICANN chief added, insisting that "defensive registrations" are not necessary.

While ICANN has not given figures, independent experts have predicted there will be anything between several hundred to 4,000 applications when applications are taken from Thursday until April 12. A list of all the applications will be published in May.

Explore further: Internet in 'coma' as Iran election looms

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

ICANN chief to leave at end of term

Aug 17, 2011

The head of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the global body which manages the technical infrastructure of the Web, has announced he will not seek another term.

Internet domain name expansion comes under fire

Dec 08, 2011

A plan to expand the number of Internet domain names came under fire in the US Congress on Thursday, a day after the head of the Federal Trade Commission said it could potentially be a "disaster."

Web boss sees risk of multiple internets

Jan 28, 2010

Clandestine efforts by some countries to create alternative versions of the Internet for political ends could put the Web at risk, the man responsible for organizing the network told AFP Wednesday.

Internet set for change with non-English addresses

Oct 26, 2009

(AP) -- The Internet is set to undergo one of the biggest changes in its four-decade history with the expected approval this week of international domain names - or addresses - that can be written in languages ...

Recommended for you

Internet in 'coma' as Iran election looms

7 hours ago

Iran is tightening control of the Internet ahead of next month's presidential election, mindful of violent street protests that social networkers inspired last time around over claims of fraud, users and ...

Bernanke forecasts gains from computer technology

May 18, 2013

(AP)—Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says pessimists who are forecasting that the economy will not reap sizable benefits from the computer revolution are likely to be proven wrong.

Yahoo Japan suspects 22 million IDs stolen

May 18, 2013

Yahoo Japan Corp. has said it suspects up to 22 million user IDs may have been stolen during an unauthorised attempt to access the administrative system of its Yahoo! Japan portal.

US seizes Bitcoin operator accounts

May 18, 2013

US authorities seized the accounts of a Bitcoin digital currency exchange operator, claiming it was functioning as an "unlicensed money service business," court documents showed Friday.

Italian police raid hackers who took on Vatican

May 17, 2013

Italian police on Friday arrested four alleged hackers believed to belong to the activist group Anonymous for attacking websites, including those of the Vatican and the parliament in Rome.

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
So as a rich squirrel with $185,000 to spare I can register .physorg?
Eric_B
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
No, you would not be able to. You would not have the rights, you nut! (You are what you eat!)

But, I ask, as a crack dealer, how can they stop me from registering .coke when the beverage co is primarily entitled to .cocacola ?
Eric_B
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
and, what #185,000?!?

how about registering .ICANNSCAM ?
Royale
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
I can't wait to see all the malware that will start pouring out when you don't even know what top level domains you can put faith into...
How about 'Symantec.real' or 'update.microsoft.ms' or 'boysandgirlsclub.porn'
They really should add some new top levels as it's necessary for internet expansion, but they shouldn't just add whatever people pay for...
Deathclock
3 / 5 (4) Jan 10, 2012
This is dumb... if they want to be progressive why not just drop the dot separator entirely and let people register simple names. Instead of http://www.physorg.com it would just be physorg. You can still maintain the site hierarchy, eg. "physorg/news", "physorg/whatever/whatever". This way the dot would not be a reserved character and could be used in the domain name as the owner sees fit.

Sure, the low level packet data would still need to include the protocol (HTTP/FTP/etc) but any web browser can handle injecting that into the address transparently.
Xbw
1 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2012
@Deathclock
Actually AOL did that back in the 90s. With all their failings I actually quite enjoyed it. I just had to type 3 letter acronyms and poof I was on a site.
Deathclock
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2012
Yeah, it can be done in software easily enough and the major browsers already allow you to simply type the name of the site minus all the http www com crap, but there is really no reason to keep them at all I don't think. In fact, the "www." part of a URL is meaningless already.

More news stories

German energy shift faces headwinds

Tense engineers have their eyes peeled on complex colour-coded diagrams on a wall-sized screen that makes their control room look like the inside of a spaceship.

Internet in 'coma' as Iran election looms

Iran is tightening control of the Internet ahead of next month's presidential election, mindful of violent street protests that social networkers inspired last time around over claims of fraud, users and ...

China police billions spell profit opportunity

Mannequins in riot gear, armoured cars and drones line a police equipment and "anti-terrorism technology" trade fair in Beijing as vendors seek to profit from China's huge internal security budget.

Honeybees trained in Croatia to find land mines

(AP)—Mirjana Filipovic is still haunted by the land mine blast that killed her boyfriend and blew off her left leg while on a fishing trip nearly a decade ago. It happened in a field that was supposedly ...

Bold action, big money needed to curb Asia floods

Asia's flood-prone megacities should fund major drainage, water recycling and waste reduction projects to stem deluges and secure clean supply for their booming populations, experts said Sunday.

Mice, gerbils perish in Russia space flight

A number of mice and eight gerbils sent into space in a Russian capsule destined to find out how well organisms can withstand extended flights perished during their journey, scientists said Sunday as the ...