Internet name 'revolution' hits doubts

Jan 10, 2012 by Tim Witcher
President and chief executive officer of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), Rod Beckstrom, pictured in 2011. The body that polices Internet registrations will on Thursday launch a domain name "revolution" in the face of the concerns of global bodies ranging from the United Nations to the US Congress.

The body that polices Internet registrations will on Thursday launch a domain name "revolution" in the face of the concerns of global bodies ranging from the United Nations to the US Congress.

The Red Cross and International Olympic Committee have already secured exclusions from the new sector that would allow company, organization and city names to rival .com as Internet addresses.

The head of the Zulus in southern Africa and a wealthy Middle East family have already expressed an interest in being part of what Rod Beckstrom, president of the (), has called a "new domain name system revolution".

The new generic (GTLDs) would allow Internet names such as .Apple or .IMF or .Paris instead of .com or .org.

ICANN says the huge expansion of the Internet, with two billion users around the world, half of them in Asia, requires the new names.

But the was among more than 25 global bodies which sent a letter to ICANN last month expressing concern about the possible "misleading registration and use" of their names.

The US Association of National Advertisers and non-profit groups such as the Young Men's Christian Association, YMCA, criticized the plan at a hearing last month.

They fear it could cause confusion about their Internet presence and force them to spend huge amounts on "defensive registration" to stop cybersquatters, who buy up names and try to sell them at an inflated price, and fraudsters.

Registration will cost $185,000 with a $25,000 annual fee after that.

Beckstrom acknowledged that providing servers and other technical and administrative backup means that the name could cost millions over the course of a decade.

But he calls the new generics "the most significant opening in the history of the ." The aggregate number of new sites "might very well rival dot.com in 10 years time," Beckstrom said ahead of the launch.

He estimates there are now more than 220 million Internet site names, and more than 90 million of them are .com.

ICANN insists however that safeguards are in place to protect the big names the scheme is aimed at.

Jamie Hedlund, ICANN vice president for government affairs, said that while the names of international organizations are not trademarks, they would get the same protection if they are mentioned in international treaties.

If "someone applies for .unitednations, they will have lost their $185,000 application fee because they don't have the right to that name," Hedlund told reporters.

The International Olympic Committee and International Red Cross secured an opt-out meaning their names could not be registered after talks with ICANN, he said. Other international bodies had not reacted so quickly, he added.

However Beckstrom said ICANN is "very sensitive" to the concerns raised by the international organizations last month. "We'll be responding to that letter," he said.

If anyone applied for one of the top-level domains using a known trademark or service mark, the owner could complain to a panel of intellectual property experts, who would decide who had rights to the term.

"If they have no rights to that term, you are in an extremely good position," the ICANN chief added, insisting that "defensive registrations" are not necessary.

While ICANN has not given figures, independent experts have predicted there will be anything between several hundred to 4,000 applications when applications are taken from Thursday until April 12. A list of all the applications will be published in May.

Explore further: Review: Google music plan solid, serendipitous

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

ICANN chief to leave at end of term

Aug 17, 2011

The head of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the global body which manages the technical infrastructure of the Web, has announced he will not seek another term.

Internet domain name expansion comes under fire

Dec 08, 2011

A plan to expand the number of Internet domain names came under fire in the US Congress on Thursday, a day after the head of the Federal Trade Commission said it could potentially be a "disaster."

Web boss sees risk of multiple internets

Jan 28, 2010

Clandestine efforts by some countries to create alternative versions of the Internet for political ends could put the Web at risk, the man responsible for organizing the network told AFP Wednesday.

Internet set for change with non-English addresses

Oct 26, 2009

(AP) -- The Internet is set to undergo one of the biggest changes in its four-decade history with the expected approval this week of international domain names - or addresses - that can be written in languages ...

Recommended for you

Review: Google music plan solid, serendipitous

17 hours ago

Google's new music service offers a lot of eye candy to go with the tunes. The song selection of around 18 million tracks is comparable to popular services such as Spotify and Rhapsody, and a myriad of playlists ...

Facebook joins Web freedom group

May 22, 2013

Facebook on Wednesday became a full member of the Global Network Initiative, a non-governmental organization promoting Internet freedom and privacy rights.

Big Data—for better or worse

May 22, 2013

A full 90% of all the data in the world has been generated over the last two years. The internet companies are awash with data that can be grouped and utilised. Is this a good thing?

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
So as a rich squirrel with $185,000 to spare I can register .physorg?
Eric_B
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
No, you would not be able to. You would not have the rights, you nut! (You are what you eat!)

But, I ask, as a crack dealer, how can they stop me from registering .coke when the beverage co is primarily entitled to .cocacola ?
Eric_B
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
and, what #185,000?!?

how about registering .ICANNSCAM ?
Royale
not rated yet Jan 10, 2012
I can't wait to see all the malware that will start pouring out when you don't even know what top level domains you can put faith into...
How about 'Symantec.real' or 'update.microsoft.ms' or 'boysandgirlsclub.porn'
They really should add some new top levels as it's necessary for internet expansion, but they shouldn't just add whatever people pay for...
Deathclock
3 / 5 (4) Jan 10, 2012
This is dumb... if they want to be progressive why not just drop the dot separator entirely and let people register simple names. Instead of http://www.physorg.com it would just be physorg. You can still maintain the site hierarchy, eg. "physorg/news", "physorg/whatever/whatever". This way the dot would not be a reserved character and could be used in the domain name as the owner sees fit.

Sure, the low level packet data would still need to include the protocol (HTTP/FTP/etc) but any web browser can handle injecting that into the address transparently.
Xbw
1 / 5 (2) Jan 10, 2012
@Deathclock
Actually AOL did that back in the 90s. With all their failings I actually quite enjoyed it. I just had to type 3 letter acronyms and poof I was on a site.
Deathclock
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 10, 2012
Yeah, it can be done in software easily enough and the major browsers already allow you to simply type the name of the site minus all the http www com crap, but there is really no reason to keep them at all I don't think. In fact, the "www." part of a URL is meaningless already.

More news stories

The long road to the 2000-watt society

The vision of a society in which each inhabitant of the earth manages to consume only 2000 watts has already been around for 15 years. During this time, there has been a steady increase in environmental awareness ...

Sensitive bomb detector to rove in search of danger

European researchers have developed and tested a light-weight device capable of detecting extremely minute quantities of explosives from up to 20 metres away, providing an invaluable law-enforcement tool ...