India gov't agrees to prosecute Google, Facebook

Jan 13, 2012

India's government authorised on Friday the prosecution of 21 Internet firms including Facebook and Google in a case over obscene content posted online, two sources told AFP.

The approval could lead to company directors being called to a trial court in New Delhi to answer serious charges such as fomenting religious hatred and spreading social discord, an official and a lawyer said.

A criminal case against the companies was first brought by journalist Vinay Rai who complained that the websites were responsible for obscene and offensive material posted by users.

He also complained that they had broken laws designed to maintain religious harmony in India, a more serious offensive that requires to be admitted in court.

"We had applied for the government's sanction and the ministry of communication and IT has filed it directly in the metropolitan magistrate's court," Rai's lawyer Sashi Prakash Tripathi told AFP.

A source in the ministry, who asked not to be named because he was unauthorised to speak to the media, confirmed to AFP that approval had been given.

The Internet companies targeted have already filed a petition in the Delhi High Court seeking to have the lower court's case against them stayed. The hearing of the petition is to resume on Monday.

Explore further: 'SwaziLeaks' looks to shake up jet-setting monarchy

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Local Indian court summons Google, Yahoo!: report

Dec 23, 2011

An Indian magistrates court has issued a summons to 21 internet sites, including Facebook, Google and Yahoo! to answer charges of circulating "obscene, lascivious content," a report said Friday.

India to ban 'offensive' Internet material

Dec 06, 2011

India on Tuesday vowed to ban offensive material from the Internet after Facebook, Google and other major firms told the government they were unable to screen content before it was posted.

NYC woman to Google: Who's posting trash about me?

Aug 18, 2010

(AP) -- A business consultant wants a court to force YouTube and owner Google to unmask a cyber cipher who posted what she says are unauthorized videos of her and online comments that hurt her reputation.

Justice Dept wants to put off AT&T-T-Mobile trial

Dec 09, 2011

(AP) -- The Justice Department said Friday it wants to withdraw or postpone its antitrust case against the proposed merger between AT&T Inc. and smaller rival T-Mobile USA now that the two companies pulled their application ...

Recommended for you

'SwaziLeaks' looks to shake up jet-setting monarchy

20 hours ago

As WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange prepares to end a two-year forced stay at Ecuador's London embassy, he may take comfort in knowing he inspired resistance to secrecy in places as far away as Swaziland.

Ecuador heralds 'digital currency' plans

20 hours ago

Ecuador is planning to create the world's first government-issued digital currency, which some analysts believe could be a first step toward abandoning the country's existing currency, the U.S. dollar, which ...

WEF unveils 'crowdsourcing' push on how to run the Web

Aug 28, 2014

The World Economic Forum unveiled a project on Thursday aimed at connecting governments, businesses, academia, technicians and civil society worldwide to brainstorm the best ways to govern the Internet.

Study: Social media users shy away from opinions

Aug 26, 2014

People on Facebook and Twitter say they are less likely to share their opinions on hot-button issues, even when they are offline, according to a surprising new survey by the Pew Research Center.

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ThanderMAX
5 / 5 (1) Jan 13, 2012
Why such Hippocracy ?
People can watch porn but can't post ??
Deathclock
2.7 / 5 (3) Jan 13, 2012
"Vinay Rai .. complained that the websites were responsible for obscene and offensive material posted by users."

Anyone else see a problem with this? Are people this fucking insane? The people responsible for that material are the people that posted it, not the people that supplied the medium. Would you sue a masonry company if someone sprayed graffiti on a brick wall?

What the hell is wrong with people? Also, "fomenting religious hatred", really? Grow the fuck up you bunch of cry babies. I guess in India they don't know the "sticks and stones can break my bones but words can never hurt me" thing...

I really hate this world and the people on it sometimes.
extremity
5 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2012
Don't forget India is on the start of a slippery slope with several of the nation's wealthiest investors pulling out for less corrupt prospects in other countries. Their government has to get who it can while it can before all the corruption inquiries oust most of the current officials.
pokerdice1
5 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2012
This is very suggestive of the actions that may occur elseware if SOPA passes in the US.
epsi00
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 13, 2012
I get really annoyed when people refer to India as the largest democracy. I guess they don't know about casts, husbands killing wives for the money...what kind of democracy is this if people cannot post to youtube anything they want.
Deathclock
5 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2012
Democracy is a system of government where the leaders are elected to rule by the consent of the governed. The term does not mean anything else, so yes India can very well be a democracy and still have crazy stupid laws like these.
Vendicar_Decarian
2.5 / 5 (4) Jan 13, 2012
"The MPAA .. complained that the websites were responsible for copyrighted material posted by users."

"Vinay Rai .. complained that the websites were responsible for obscene and offensive material posted by users."
kochevnik
1 / 5 (2) Jan 13, 2012
I get really annoyed when people refer to India as the largest democracy.
Etymology of democracy: Demos meaning "people," and Kratia meaning "to rule," therefore democracy means nothing more than MOB RULE.
DrZu
not rated yet Jan 13, 2012
This is the kind of anti-intelligence the governments in the middle east are getting well known for. To all of the companies involved I say remove your services, they would lose far more than the companies would. I wonder how much the local social pressure would change such government polices when the people learn that their government effectively unplugged facebook and google.
astro_optics
1 / 5 (1) Jan 15, 2012
Obviously, India is not a democracy! something else perhaps?
btb101
3 / 5 (2) Jan 15, 2012
can't we just kick india off the net entirely?

that would solve the problem.