US health experts seek more study on 'fracking'

Jan 09, 2012
Opponents and supporters of gas-drilling, or fracking, walk into the last of four public hearings on proposed fracking regulations in upstate New York, in 2011 in New York City. A group of US medical professionals called Monday for a halt to a type of drilling for natural gas called "fracking" in populated areas until more is known about its health impacts.

A group of US medical professionals called Monday for a halt to a type of drilling for natural gas called "fracking" in populated areas until more is known about its health impacts.

"When it comes to hydrofracking, our guiding principle for public policy should be the same as the one used by physicians: 'First, do no harm,'" said Adam Law, of Weill Cornell Medical College, and a founding member of Physicians Scientists and Engineers for Healthy Energy.

"There is a need for scientific and epidemiological information on the health impacts of fracking. Frankly, no one should be unleashing even more fracking before we have the scientific facts. There are health care needs in various communities and these must be met. The reality is that industry has not done nearly enough to finance the needed research effort."

The comments came at a conference called in response to a suggestion made by the National Institute of the of fracking -- which uses high pressure injections of water, sand and chemicals are used to blast through rock to release oil and gas trapped inside.

The technique has been used to vastly boost US natural gas output, but some critics express concern that it may lead to and other environmental impacts.

"There are a lot of questions related to the human health and ecological impacts of this process of unconventional that need to be answered," said Jerome Paulson of the George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences.

"The answers to the questions about the human and ecosystem health impacts here will only come from scientific research."

Chris Tucker, spokesman for the industry-backed group Energy In Depth, said the gathering was not a conference of concerned scientists, it’s a conference of paid activists."

"We've been fracturing wells in this country since the Truman administration, more than 1.2 million applications over 65 years in more than 30 different states," Tucker said in an email.

"What these guys are essentially arguing is that the mere act of turning a drill bit horizontally... represents a greater risk to human health than drilling straight down into the formation, which we've been doing safely for more than 150 years. It's a position that's completely unmoored from the facts, from the science, and from the demonstrable history of safe operations to which this industry lays claim."

Explore further: When the isthmus is an island: Madison's hottest, and coldest, spots

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hundreds attend EPA hearing on Pa. gas drilling

Jul 22, 2010

(AP) -- Hundreds of people are attending a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hearing in southwestern Pennsylvania on a controversial natural gas drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."

English tremors blamed on shale 'fracking'

Nov 02, 2011

(AP) -- The only company in Britain using hydraulic fracturing to release natural gas from shale rock said Wednesday that the controversial technique probably did trigger earth tremors in April and May.

Amid US gas boom, split over environment risks

Jun 26, 2011

The United States is seeing a natural gas boom thanks to discoveries of abundant shale gas, and at the same time a groundswell of opposition from critics who say the environmental risks from drilling are too ...

Duke study offers 7 safeguards for hydraulic fracturing

Nov 17, 2011

A new report by Duke University researchers offers several health and environmental measures for North Carolina lawmakers to consider as they debate legalizing horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing for natural gas.

Recommended for you

Stopping the leaks

6 hours ago

When a big old cast-iron water main blows, it certainly makes for a spectacular media event.

Alpine lifelines on the brink

8 hours ago

Only one in ten Alpine rivers are healthy enough to maintain water supply and to cope with climate impacts according to a report by WWF. The publication is the first-ever comprehensive study on the condition ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
5 / 5 (2) Jan 09, 2012
All drilling companies must be required to notify regulatory agencies of exactly what is in every drop of fluid they pump into the ground. More, every drilling company must be required to use a unique chemical marker to identify fluids it injects into the earth.
Can anyone explain to me why this cannot be done without 'violating' the drilling companies rights to proprietary information? Their fracking fluids are patented, aren't they? And if they are not?