Wanted: Habitable moons

Jan 06, 2012 By Nola Taylor Redd
According to the Planetary Habitability Laboratory's recently released periodic table of exoplanets, warm Neptunes and 96 warm Jovians lay within their star's habitable zone. If they managed to capture rocky Earth-sized moons on their journey inward, such moons would be able to hold liquid water, and be potential wells of life. Credit: PHL

As the Kepler space telescope continues to search for potentially habitable planets, it also may reveal moons that could host life. Three new simulations will help astronomers identify rocky satellites that could hold water on their surface, if the parent planet circles close enough to its sun.

When the science team announced the discovery of 1235 planetary candidates in February 2010, the candidates included 37 Neptune-sized and 10 Jupiter-sized planets within their star’s habitable zones: the region of space where water can exist as a liquid on a rocky planet. Though gas giants would not boast liquid water on their surface, their moons might.

According to David Kipping, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, a well-sized rocky "ticks all the boxes for our wish list of habitable conditions."

Kipping, one of the members of the Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler team, authored and utilized one of three  simulations designed to help astronomers pick such a moon out of the data.

Telescopes such as Kepler search for planets as they transit, or cross in front of, their star. Each of the simulations takes those transits and searches for variations that would reveal the presence of a moon orbiting a planet.

"When a moon passes in front of a star, it causes the star to appear dimmer for a short amount of time," Kipping explained.

As the planet crosses in front of the star, it makes a sizable footprint. The moon, revolving around its planet, also makes a small dip in the light.  As the moon slips behind its planet, the brightness of the star increases very slightly.

Kipping's model, which was published in the journal the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS) in May 2010, calculated what the signal of a single moon would look like as it slipped between its star and Earth. This signal  can even help astronomers find moons whose orbits don't stick to the same plane as their planet.

The habitable zone depends on the mass and type of star. Planets - or rocky moons - within this zone can hold liquid water on their surface, making them strong candidates for the evolution of life. In this graph, our solar system’s habitable zone is compared to the Gliese 581 system. Credit: ESO

"If you look at Triton, around Neptune, it has an inclined orbit," Kipping said.

Triton orbits at 157 degrees from the plane of the planet's equator.

"Something like that, we would be able to detect."

Another simulation, created by Luis Tusnski, of the National Institute for Space Research in Brazil, and Adriana Valio, of Mackenzie Presbyterian University (also in Brazil), searches for moons orbiting within the same plane as their planet, though it can be easily adapted to look for moons with inclined orbits.

"The physical justification for this assumption (of non-inclined orbits) is that the planet and the moon were formed together," Valio explained.

However, it also identifies planets with Saturn-like rings, which create a unique data signal.

The Brazilian team's model, which was published in the December 2010 Astrophysical Journal, takes into account the presence of spots on the stellar surface as well. Like sunspots, these dark patches rotate across the skin of the star, reducing the amount of light produced. If a patch lined up with a planet, the dimming could appear to be a moon.

"A starspot could look very similar," Kipping said.

The Kepler space telescope looks for dips in starlight caused by a planet passing in front of its star from our point of view. While the light curve from such a planetary transit can tell astronomers about the planet’s orbit and radius, other methods are needed to learn other characteristics, such as its mass. Credit: University of Washington

Astronomers using Kipping's would need to search for a wobble in the starlight in order to distinguish between a moon and a starspot; a moon would tug at the stellar body ever so slightly.

While both of these simulations are limited to a single moon, a third study by András Pál, of Konkoly Observatory in Hungary, is capable of analyzing planetary systems with multiple transits.

"András' model is mathematically quite beautiful, as it can handle any number of moons or planets," Kipping said.

At the same time, it is limited to circular orbits, rather than the more varied orbits permitted by Tusnski's.

Pál's research will be published in an upcoming edition of the MNRAS.

"Everyone is finding their own approach to solving the problem, and I think they're really very complimentary," Kipping said.

In search of a satellite

According to Tusnski, the French space mission Convection Rotation and Planetary Transits (CoRoT) should be able to detect a moon with a radius 1.3 times as large as Earth, while Kepler would be able to spot a moon a third the size of our planet.

"Once the moon is clearly detected, its basic properties, such as its size, can be determined as precisely as the standalone planets with similar sizes," Pál said.

But in order to calculate the properties, such a moon must first be found.

"The real question is if they exist," said Kipping.

Jupiter's moon Ganymede, the largest moon in the solar system, is two-fifths the radius of Earth, but only 2 percent as massive.

In order to be habitable, however, such a moon would need to be at least a third as massive as Earth.

"Any smaller, and it would be like Mars," unable to hold onto a thick atmosphere, Kipping explained.

Uranus and its five major moons are depicted in this montage of images acquired by the Voyager 2 spacecraft. Uranus appears as a uniformly blue globe, similar to how the eye would naturally see it; only with computer-aided image processing do subtle bands in the planet's upper atmosphere appear. The moons, from largest to smallest as they appear here, are Ariel, Miranda, Titania, Oberon and Umbriel. Voyager 2 also discovered 10 smaller moons and relayed images of Uranus's ring system during the planetary encounter nearly 2 billion miles from Earth. Credit: NASA/JPL

The gas giants in our solar system have moons with the potential to develop life - but only because they are so far from the . Ganymede's icy shell would melt if the moon were closer to Earth, and the water would likely boil off into space.  If Saturn's moon Titan were relocated to the Sun's habitable zone, it would lose the thick methane atmosphere that makes it a potential candidate for the development of life.

Still, just because a habitable moon doesn’t appear to be in our solar system doesn't mean they don't exist elsewhere. The fact that so many gas giants have been discovered close to their suns makes habitable moons more rather than less likely.

Kipping pointed to recent research by Simon Porter of Lowell Observatory in Arizona that indicates approximately half the Jupiter-sized planets migrating inward toward their stars may capture a terrestrial planet as a new moon.  He  states this the most likely method for a gas giant to obtain such a large .

"You wouldn't really expect a moon that big to form in situ around a planet," he said.

But if the planet travels all the way through the star’s habitable zone, temperatures there would be too high for water to remain on the moon’s  surface.

"It's really a question as to, are there many solar systems where the planet stops before it gets too close [to the star]?"

Explore further: A spectacular landscape of star formation

Related Stories

Wobbly planets could reveal Earth-like moons

Dec 11, 2008

Moons outside our Solar System with the potential to support life have just become much easier to detect, thanks to research by an astronomer at University College London (UCL).

How to weigh a star using a moon

Oct 15, 2010

How do astronomers weigh a star that's trillions of miles away and way too big to fit on a bathroom scale? In most cases they can't, although they can get a best estimate using computer models of stellar structure.

Detecting Life-Friendly Moons

Oct 26, 2009

The search for life-friendly real estate around distant stars doesn't have to be limited to planets. New research shows that habitable exomoons can be detected with a new method using current technology.

Will Kepler find habitable moons?

Sep 03, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Since the launch of the NASA Kepler Mission earlier this year, astronomers have been keenly awaiting the first detection of an Earth-like planet around another star. Now, in an echo of science ...

Avatar's moon Pandora could be real

Dec 17, 2009

In the new blockbuster Avatar, humans visit the habitable - and inhabited - alien moon called Pandora. Life-bearing moons like Pandora or the Star Wars forest moon of Endor are a staple of science fiction. ...

'Hot Jupiter' planets unlikely to have moons

Aug 23, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Planets of the major type so far found outside our solar system are unlikely to have moons, according to new research reported in the August 20 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Recommended for you

Swirling electrons in the whirlpool galaxy

7 hours ago

The whirlpool galaxy Messier 51 (M51) is seen from a distance of approximately 30 million light years. This galaxy appears almost face-on and displays a beautiful system of spiral arms.

A spectacular landscape of star formation

13 hours ago

This image, captured by the Wide Field Imager at ESO's La Silla Observatory in Chile, shows two dramatic star formation regions in the Milky Way. The first, on the left, is dominated by the star cluster NGC ...

Exoplanet measured with remarkable precision

Aug 19, 2014

Barely 30 years ago, the only planets astronomers had found were located right here in our own solar system. The Milky Way is chock-full of stars, millions of them similar to our own sun. Yet the tally ...

New star catalog reveals unexpected 'solar salad'

Aug 19, 2014

(Phys.org) —An Arizona State University alumnus has devised the largest catalog ever produced for stellar compositions. Called the Hypatia Catalog, after one of the first female astronomers who lived in ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

nuge
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 06, 2012
I suspect this might even be more common than an Earth-like scenario, given how many hot Jupiters have been found.
that_guy
1.8 / 5 (4) Jan 06, 2012
That's no moon. It's a space station!

According to Tusnski, the French space mission Convection Rotation and Planetary Transits (CoRoT) should be able to detect a moon with a radius 1.3 times as large as Earth, while Kepler would be able to spot a moon a third the size of our planet.

As long as it orbits within the right distance around the right planet around a small star, just the right way...Such an asinine statement.

I can theoretically see a candle from ten miles away in complete darkness. In the real world, it might be a couple hundred feet.

Tell me, using constraints of the real world, what are the real chances of being able to detect an earthlike moon in the habitable zone. 1%? 2%?

"But in order to calculate the properties, such a moon must first be found.

"The real question is if they exist," said Kipping.


In our universe, if it is reasonably possible, then it does exist.
Idiomatic
4 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2012
In our universe, if it is reasonably possible, then it does exist.


The difficulty is that to capture a moon, the planet would have to be much more massive. But a much more massive planet would collapse into a star.

So really, what we would be looking for is probably closer to a binary planet system I guess?
bredmond
5 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2012
if we were to live on a moon with a different mass than earth, would the difference in gravity affect us? for example the moon is roughly 1/6th the mass of earth as i understand. and astronauts orbiting the earth in outerspace have to persistently exercise to avoid atrophy and bone demineralization or some such health concern. Does the gravity have to be zero before this issue occurs? or does the moon's 1/6th of earth's mass have enough difference so as to cause similar problems but on a reduced scale?
RonPaul1
1.4 / 5 (5) Jan 07, 2012
Shit nigger, think about all that radiation coming from a gas giant. :-O
shockr
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2012
if we were to live on a moon with a different mass than earth, would the difference in gravity affect us? for example the moon is roughly 1/6th the mass of earth as i understand. and astronauts orbiting the earth in outerspace have to persistently exercise to avoid atrophy and bone demineralization or some such health concern. Does the gravity have to be zero before this issue occurs? or does the moon's 1/6th of earth's mass have enough difference so as to cause similar problems but on a reduced scale?


This is true bredmond, but I don't think we're looking for planets where we could live. It's more about finding proof of life outside of our solar system. Thus, providing the gravity is high enough to trap certain greenhouse gasses and other required elements etc before they were lost to space, then any life arising on such a planet/moon would evolve to the gravity conditions prevailent there.
shockr
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2012
cont.. from what I'm aware, the reduced energy and muscle use due to the lack of gravity resistance is what causes the medical issues. A planet with 0.5 G at surface level would require someone to excersize twice as much to maintain equilibrium.. (don't quote the math there).
Callippo
1 / 5 (3) Jan 07, 2012
Most of moons are much less habitable, than the Sahara or Antarctica. Why to spend the money in the plans of their visit and transformation instead of making the Sahara and Antarctica habitable, after then?