Comparing energy conversion of plants and solar cells

Jan 16, 2012 By Sharon Durham
Comparing energy conversion of plants and solar cells
A team of scientists has devised a new way to more accurately compare how efficiently plants and photovoltaic, or solar, cells convert sunlight into energy, which could ultimately help researchers improve plant photosynthesis, a critical first link to enhancing the global supply of food, feed, fiber and bioenergy. Credit: Institute for Genomic Biology/University of Illinois.

Scientists now have a way to more accurately compare how efficiently plants and photovoltaic, or solar, cells convert sunlight into energy, thanks to findings by a research consortium that included a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientist.

The study, published in Science, could help researchers improve plant photosynthesis, a critical first link in the for food, feed, fiber and bioenergy production.

Comparing plant and photovoltaic systems is a challenge. Although both processes harvest energy from sunlight, they use that energy in different ways. Plants convert the sun's energy into chemical energy, whereas solar cells produce electricity. The scientists, including Agricultural Research Service (ARS) research leader Donald Ort in the agency's Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit in Urbana, Ill., identified specific designs that hold excellent promise for improving efficiency.

The first step was to facilitate a direct comparison of the two systems. The researchers set a uniform basis for the comparison and examined the major factors that define the efficiencies of both processes, first considering current technology, then looking forward to possible strategies for improvements.

In all cases, the research team considered the efficiency of harvesting the entire as a basis for comparison. Additionally, the researchers compared plants to solar cell arrays that also store energy in . Calculations were applied to a solar cell array that was coupled to an electrolyzer that used electricity from the array to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. The free energy needed to split water is essentially the same as that needed for photosynthesis or a solar cell, so the comparison provided a level playing field.

Using this type of calculation, the annual averaged efficiency of solar-cell-driven electrolysis is about 10 percent. efficiencies for are about 1 percent, which illustrates the significant potential to improve the efficiency of the natural system, according to Ort. While, in the context of the team's efficiency analysis, solar cells have a clear advantage compared to photosynthesis, there is a need to apply both in the service of sustainable energy conversion for the future.

This energy-efficiency analysis between plant photosynthesis and will lay the groundwork for improving the efficiency of plant photosynthesis in agriculture for improved yield.

Explore further: Environmentally compatible organic solar cells

Provided by USDA Agricultural Research Service

2.3 /5 (3 votes)

Related Stories

Unprecedented efficiency in producing hydrogen from water

Dec 04, 2006

Scientists are reporting a major advance in technology for water photooxidation �using sunlight to produce clean-burning hydrogen fuel from ordinary water. Michael Gratzel and colleagues in Switzerland note that nature ...

Nanostructures improve solar cell efficiency

May 26, 2011

To make solar cells a competitive alternative to other renewable energy sources, researchers are investigating different alternatives. A step in the right direction is through new processes that change the ...

Dye-sensitized solar cells break a new record

Nov 14, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Dye-sensitized Grätzel solar cells have just set a new efficiency benchmark. By changing the composition and color of the cells, an EPFL team has increased their efficiency to more than ...

Recommended for you

Environmentally compatible organic solar cells

7 hours ago

Environmentally compatible production methods for organic solar cells from novel materials are in the focus of "MatHero". The new project coordinated by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) aims at making ...

Floating nuclear plants could ride out tsunamis

8 hours ago

When an earthquake and tsunami struck the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant complex in 2011, neither the quake nor the inundation caused the ensuing contamination. Rather, it was the aftereffects—specifically, ...

Unlocking secrets of new solar material

8 hours ago

(Phys.org) —A new solar material that has the same crystal structure as a mineral first found in the Ural Mountains in 1839 is shooting up the efficiency charts faster than almost anything researchers have ...

Ikea buys wind farm in Illinois

Apr 15, 2014

These days, Ikea is assembling more than just furniture. About 150 miles south of Chicago in Vermilion County, Ill., the home goods giant is building a wind farm large enough to ensure that its stores will never have to buy ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Cave_Man
1 / 5 (1) Jan 16, 2012
"The study could help researchers improve plant photosynthesis, ..."

What makes you think a scientist or even a massive collaboration of them could "improve" a plant process that has evolved for billions of years.

What they SHOULD have done was protect the wildlife, all of it, 50 years ago. Half the rain forest or more is gone, I have heard startling rumors of 70-80% gone. Maybe even 90% like our oceans.

Life may be resilient but every species we lose has unique chemicals in them and are already the best possible producers of those chemicals given to us, all you do is input and they output a processed thing. If you think you can upgrade that you are mistaken, you may eventually be able to fully understand and replicate that symbiosis but improving on something so complex is far in our future and even then there will be intense ethical unknowns.
Sanescience
not rated yet Jan 17, 2012
The future will be a product of the desperate search to support ever greater populations of the planet. Bio tech will become the rule, not the exception. People who are miserable and hungry and scared will continue to chop down jungles and forests regardless of sustainability because their other choice is to just perish.
Jacob_Cameron
not rated yet Jan 23, 2012
Very interesting, hopefully this will lead to further funding and investment in this needed industry. I posted a few updates on solar in Europe energycareers.org

More news stories

IBM posts lower 1Q earnings amid hardware slump

IBM's first-quarter earnings fell and revenue came in below Wall Street's expectations amid an ongoing decline in its hardware business, one that was exasperated by weaker demand in China and emerging markets.

Microsoft CEO is driving data-culture mindset

(Phys.org) —Microsoft's future strategy: is all about leveraging data, from different sources, coming together using one cohesive Microsoft architecture. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella on Tuesday, both in ...

Researchers see hospitalization records as additional tool

Comparing hospitalization records with data reported to local boards of health presents a more accurate way to monitor how well communities track disease outbreaks, according to a paper published April 16 in the journal PLOS ON ...

Ebola virus in Africa outbreak is a new strain

Scientists say that the Ebola (ee-BOH'-lah) virus that has killed scores of people this year in Guinea (GIH'-nee) is a new strain. That means it did not spread there from outbreaks in some other African nations.