Climate change models may underestimate extinctions

Jan 04, 2012
University of Connecticut Assistant Professor Mark Urban stands under a sheet of aufeis in Alaska. These ice sheets form over Arctic underground springs but have become less prevalent with global warming. Urban, a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology, fears that current climate change models may grossly underestimate future extinctions because they fail to account for species competition and movement. Credit: Mark Urban

Predictions of the loss of animal and plant diversity around the world are common under models of future climate change. But a new study shows that because these climate models don't account for species competition and movement, they could grossly underestimate future extinctions.

"We have really sophisticated meteorological models for predicting climate change," says Mark Urban, the study's lead author. "But in real life, animals move around, they compete, they parasitize each other and they eat each other. The majority of our predictions don't include these important interactions."

Plenty of experimental studies have shown that species are already moving in response to climate change, says Urban, assistant professor of and at the University of Connecticut. For example, as temperatures rise over time, animals and plants that can't take the heat are moving to higher altitudes where temperatures are cooler.

But not all species can disperse fast enough to get to these more suitable places before they die off, Urban says. And if they do make it to these better habitats, they may be outcompeted by the species that are already there – or the ones that got there first.

With coauthors Josh Tewksbury and Kimberly Sheldon of the University of Washington, Urban created a mathematical model that takes into account the varying rates of migration and the different intensities of competition seen in ecological communities. The goal was to predict just how successful species within these communities would be at shifting to completely new habitats.

Their results showed that animals and plants that can adjust to climate change will have a competitive advantage over those that don't.

Animals with small geographic ranges, specific needs and difficulty dispersing are likely to go extinct under climate change, their model shows. Further, these animals are more likely to be overrun by other species that can tolerate a wider range of habitats.

"When a species has a small range, it's more likely to be outcompeted by others," Urban says. "It's not about how fast you can move, but how fast you move relative to your competitors."

Urban likens this scenario to a train traveling up a mountain on a track. If each boxcar – representing a species – travels at the same speed, they will likely all reach the top eventually. But in reality, each car can move at a different speed, creating a collision course.

"There's always a car in front of you and a car behind," explains Urban. "When you introduce the ability to move at different speeds, they're constantly bumping into one another, even running each other over. It's a recipe for disaster."

Importantly, the authors speculate that current predictions of biodiversity loss under climate change – many of which are used by conservations organizations and governments – could be vastly underestimating species extinctions.

Tropical communities, for example, which often have many species living in small areas, could be among the hardest hit by climate change. Urban says that this is a first step toward making predictions of biodiversity more sophisticated.

"This a first step – to include in our models things that we know are true, like competition and dispersal," says Urban. "Knowing these things, can we predict which might be most at risk?"

Explore further: Seals forage at offshore wind farms

More information: Urban's paper appears in the January 4 online edition of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Related Stories

Global Warming Increases Species Extinctions Worldwide

Nov 15, 2006

Global warming has already caused extinctions in the most sensitive habitats and will continue to cause more species to go extinct over the next 50 to 100 years, confirms the most comprehensive study since 2003 on the effects ...

A changing climate for protected areas

Apr 02, 2007

On April 6, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will release a report entitled Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability that focuses on how climate change is affecting the planet.

Recommended for you

Seals forage at offshore wind farms

Jul 21, 2014

By using sophisticated GPS tracking to monitor seals' every movement, researchers have shown for the first time that some individuals are repeatedly drawn to offshore wind farms and pipelines. Those man-made ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CSYGUY
1.1 / 5 (7) Jan 04, 2012
... and how did these species do during the last natural warming period?

You propose a theory and then try to disprove your theory - it is called science. Try it sometime.
oslovitjanin
4.9 / 5 (7) Jan 04, 2012
Another factor to be considered is the habitat fragmentation. Huge parts of the earth's surface are artificial, agricultural or degraded landscapes without natural vegetation. There often aren't any directions today for species to slide along gradients - compared to previous climate changes. When the spot (reserve, natural forest area) you are living in disappears, and when the natural "next stop" is occupied by humans and technology, where do you go? This should boost the extinction rate even more.
drr3
5 / 5 (6) Jan 04, 2012
@CSYGUY The rate of future change is much higher than that of the transition from the last glacial to interglacial. During the last major warming, species had thousands of years to make the necessary migrations. Not so this time, if the future warming forecasts are even remotely accurate. And I won't even dignify your other comment. Did you even read the paper?
RitchieGuy
1.8 / 5 (5) Jan 05, 2012
""their results showed that animals and plants that can adjust to climate change will have a competitive advantage over those that don't.""

This is the essence of the article. The purpose of science is also to preserve that which cannot move out fast enough into a more optimal region for survival. Botanists can do that for the flora, if they wish to do so. The savings of "heritage" seeds in a climate controlled environment also helps to sustain future survival when the natural environment has improved.
Brushfoot
not rated yet Jan 05, 2012
Because wildlife will also be competing with humans for habitable land I fear that species loss will be even greater. Food crop production is frequently said to need to double by 2050 to meet expected population growth and agriculture has been the single biggest driver of habitat loss and extinction since the Pleistocene.
9999
1 / 5 (2) Jan 12, 2012
If the author claims that Professor Mark Urban is STANDING under a sheet of aufeis, why should we believe he is in Alaska or anything else in the article for that matter?