Stanford researchers find that pension funds for California state workers are still in peril - action needed now

Dec 15, 2011 By Dan Stober

Almost two years ago, a Stanford study stirred up discussion statewide with the prediction that the pension funds of California's state workers were headed for a train wreck. The retirement system would eventually not have enough money to pay all that it owes to its retirees.

Since then, the picture has not improved, Joe Nation, a public policy expert at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, said Tuesday as he released a report on his latest research. "Perhaps surprisingly, the situation is even worse." The unfunded liabilities of the pension funds have increased by 15 to 20 percent.

All this could have a direct effect on state services as money is diverted to pay the pensioners. "That increased spending on pensions is virtually certain to continue to crowd out non-pension spending, including education and social services," the report warned.

The big state pension funds at the center of the huge financial problem are the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), and the University of California Retirement Plan (UCRP).

The combined unfunded liability for the three funds is  $290.6 billion, presuming that the funds earn a 6.2 percent return from investments. That figure represents an unfunded amount per California household of nearly $24,000, Nation said.

 Even if the retirement funds yield 7.75 percent, the situation would remain dangerous, he said.

The crisis was driven by pension funds that understated the costs of pension payouts and over-estimated the amount of money the funds would have in future years, Nation said. The strategy was, "If you can push costs off to the future, do it."

Board members of pension funds were typically not required to have any technical expertise. Contribution rates for employees were set too low – zero for some.

Any solution, Nation said, will have to involve current state workers: "There's just no way to solve this problem if that's not there." The cost to delay a solution for another year is $1.247 billion, or $3.4 million each day. The hope, he said, is that policymakers will step up and actually address the problem.

More information on the pension crisis will be released this week on the SIEPR website.

Explore further: Economist probes the high cost of health care

Related Stories

California state pension funds going broke, study finds

Apr 06, 2010

( -- California public employee pension systems are worse off than anyone previously projected, according to a new report generated by five graduate students in Stanford's Graduate Public Policy Program. The result ...

Bigger is better in pension funds, researchers find

Sep 12, 2011

The health of the pension system is front page news in countries around the world with an ongoing debate on required contribution rates or minimum retirement ages. An equally relevant issue is how efficiently savings invested ...

NIU's Peters says pension reform must be fair to all

Jun 22, 2011

Efforts to repair the state’s failing pension system should not punish those who have faithfully paid into that system, Northern Illinois University President John Peters said today in his keynote address at the State ...

Research may help states address unfunded retiree liabilities

Jan 13, 2010

Research shows that, nationally, states are facing more than $550 billion in unfunded liabilities associated with health care and other non-pension benefits for retired state employees, a situation many states are now struggling ...

'Credit Crunch' Will Hit Retirees in Unequal Ways

Oct 09, 2008

( -- How severely retirees will be affected by the continuing financial crisis and subsequent "credit crunch" depends to a considerable extent on the kinds of retirement plans they rely on for retirement income, ...

Recommended for you

Do government technology investments pay off?

3 hours ago

Studies confirm that IT investments in companies improve productivity and efficiency. University of Michigan professor M.S. Krishnan wondered if the same was true for government.

Study finds assisted housing works, but it could be improved

3 hours ago

Two researchers from the University of Kansas Department of Urban Planning have just completed a study on the locations of assisted housing units and assisted households across the nation. It examines one of the key issues ...

Economist probes the high cost of health care

Mar 27, 2015

When Zack Cooper arrived at Yale as assistant professor of public health and economics, he gained access to a first-of-its-kind dataset. Working with the non-profit Health Care Cost Institute, Cooper and ...

Cash remains king in Chile but its days could be numbered

Mar 26, 2015

For more than a year now, Chileans have endured a crisis of cash access. Despite global moves toward new forms of payment such as contactless and mobile transfers, the crisis in Chile highlights the continuing ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (2) Dec 15, 2011
The strategy was, "If you can push costs off to the future, do it."

What else is new?

That's what baby boomers have always done. It's why the federal government is broke too.

The whole "retire with 90% income" thing didn't seem too much maybe?

Anybody under 25 or 30 should leave california asap, so as to not become a permanent slave to the previous generation.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2011
Not baby boomers but government is the problem. The "CEO" of the government acts to maximize votes not profit.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2011
Nano is correct. As usual.

The failure is the direct result of the "Me Me Me generation of Neo-Conservatvies" who have screwed up virtually everything they have got their hands on.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.