Why silicon-based aliens would rather eat our cities than us: Thoughts on non-carbon astrobiology
December 21, 2011 By Bruce Dorminey, Universe Today
A graphic associated with the original 'War of the Worlds' by H.G. Wells.
Conventional wisdom has long had it that carbon-based life, so common here on earth, must surely be abundant elsewhere; both in our galaxy and the universe as a whole.
This line of reasoning is founded on two major assumptions; the first being that complex carbon chain molecules, the building blocks of life as we know it, have been detected throughout the interstellar medium. Carbons abundance appears to stretch across much of cosmic time, since its production is thought to have peaked some 7 billion years ago, when the universe was roughly half its current age.
The other major assumption is that life needs an elixir, a solvent on which it can advance its unique complex chemistry. Water and carbon go hand in hand in making this happen.
While the world as we know it runs on carbon, science fictions long flirtation with silicon-based life Its life, but not as we know it has become a familiar catchphrase. But life of any sort should evolve, eat, excrete, reproduce, and respond to stimulus.
And although non-carbon based life is a very long shot, we thought wed broach the issue with one of the countrys top astrochemists Max Bernstein, the Research Lead of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA headquarters in Washington,D.C.
Bruce Dorminey IS IT WRONG TO ASSUME THAT LIFE COULD BE BASED ON SOMETHING OTHER THAN CARBON?
Max Bernstein Its important for us to keep an open mind about alien life, lest we come across it and miss it. On the other hand, carbon is much better than any other element in forming the main structures of living things. Carbon can form many stable complex structures of great diversity. When carbon forms molecules containing cxygen and nitrogen, the carbon bonds to nitrogen and oxygen are stable. But not so much so that they cant be fairly easily undone, unlike silicon-oxygen bonds, for example.
Dorminey DOES THE RECENT NASA-FUNDED RESEARCH AT MONO LAKE, CALIFORNIA WHICH TOUTED THE DISCOVERY OF BACTERIA WITH DNA THAT USES ARSENIC INSTEAD OF PHOSPHORUS RATTLE THE CURRENT PARADIGM?
Bernstein That was a really cool result, but the basic structure was still carbon. The arsenic was said to have replaced phosphorus, not carbon. The discovery of this putative arsenic organism may prove to be incorrect, but its a hypothesis with science behind it, and not just someone tossing out an idea and leaving it at the level of what if you replaced carbon with silicon?
Dorminey SILICON SEEMS TO BE THE MOST POPULAR NON-CARBON BASED CANDIDATE, ARE THERE OTHERS THAT ALSO MIGHT BE FEASIBLE?
Bernstein Its hard to imagine anything that would be more likely that silicon because there is nothing closer to carbon than silicon in terms of its chemistry. Its in the right place on the periodic table, just below carbon. On the face of it, [silicon-based life] doesnt seem too absurd since silicon, like carbon, forms four bonds. CH4 is methane and SiH4 is silane. They are analogous molecules so the basic idea is that perhaps silicon could form an entire parallel chemistry, and even life. But there are tons of problems with this idea. We dont see a complex stable chemistry [solely] of silicon and hydrogen, as we see with carbon and hydrogen. We use hydrocarbon chains in our lipids (molecules that make up membranes), but the analogous silane chains would not be stable. Whereas carbon-oxygen bonds can be made and unmade this goes on in our bodies all the time this is not true for silicon. This would severely limit silicons life-like chemistry. Maybe you could have something silicon-based thats sort of alive, but only in the sense that it passes on information.
Dorminey IF SILICON-BASED LIFE IS OUT THERE, HOW COULD WE EVER DETECT IT REMOTELY?
Bernstein We are seriously arguing about how we would remotely detect life just like us, so I really couldnt say. Presumably technology-using organisms, whatever their biochemistry, will produce technology, so the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) may be our best shot.
Dorminey HOW WOULD YOU LOOK FOR SILICON-BASED LIFE HERE ON EARTH?
Bernstein When seeking an alien organism its really tough because you just dont know what molecules to look for. One would have to be satisfied by something a bit more ambiguous, like sets of molecules that should not be there. For example, if you were an alien Silicon organism, you might not be looking for our biochemistry, but the fact that you kept seeing exactly the same chain lengths over and over again might tip you off to the fact that those darn carbon chains might actually be the basis of an organisms membranes.
Dorminey WHERE ARE THE LARGEST CONCENTRATIONS OF SILICON HERE?
IN SAND?
Bernstein In sand or rock. There are literally megatons of silicate minerals on Earth.
Dorminey HAS ANYONE EVER CLAIMED DETECTION OF SELF-REPLICATING EXAMPLES OF SILICON HERE ON EARTH?
Bernstein There have been ideas about minerals holding information just as DNA holds information. DNA holds information in a chain that is read from one end to the other. In contrast, a mineral could hold information in two dimensions [on its surface]. A crystal grows when new atoms arrive on the surface, building layer upon layer. So, if a crystal sheet cleaved off and then started to grow that would be like the birth of a new organism and would carry information from generation to generation. But is a replicating crystal alive? To date, I dont think that there is actually any evidence that minerals pass information like this.
Dorminey IS THE CRUX OF THE PROBLEM THAT SILICON-BASED LIFE WOULD BE SO SLOWLY REPLICATING THAT IT COULD NEVER MAKE IT IN A DYNAMIC UNIVERSE?
Bernstein I dont think that any Silicon life form could be a biological threat to us. If they were high tech, they might eat our buildings or shoot guns at us but I dont see how they could infect us. We run hot and move fast. If we dont, things will catch us and eat us.
If they are also tougher than we are and whatever feeds on them is also slow and Silicon based maybe being slow doesnt matter.
Dorminey WHAT WOULD BE THE SIGNATURES OF SILICON-BASED LIFE?
Bernstein If they are not technological, they would be very tough to detect. We could look for unstable, unexpected silicon molecules; some high energy molecule that should not be there, or molecular chains of all the same length.
Dorminey DO YOU THINK THAT SILICON-BASED LIFE MIGHT EXIST SOMEWHERE OUT THERE?
Bernstein Maybe deep below the surface of a planet in some very hot hydrogen-rich, Oxygen-poor environment, you would have this complex silane chemistry. There, maybe silanes would form reversible silicon bonds with selenium or tellurium.
Dorminey IF SUCH SILICON-BASED LIFE DID CROP UP, WHAT WOULD BE ITS EVOLUTIONARY ENDGAME?
Bernstein If it could evolve past the protist [microorganism] stage, then I think it could evolve intelligence. I have no idea how likely it is for intelligence to evolve, but I can believe in silicon crystals passing information from layer to layer or in silicon artificial intelligence, but I dont expect to see silicon apes playing their equivalent of Angry Birds on their Silicon-Phones.
Dorminey IF SILICON-LIFE DID EVOLVE, WOULD ITS LIFESPAN BE MUCH LONGER THAN ITS CARBON-BASED ANALOGUES?
Bernstein The replicating mineral that I described earlier would be living very, very slowly on Earths surface. But maybe somewhere very much hotter, its lifespan would be shorter. Thats because presumably lifespan is connected to the pace of your chemistry, which depends on temperature.
Dorminey FINALLY, WHAT WOULD ENDANGER NON-CARBON-BASED LIFE?
Bernstein Physical harm for sure. Presumably you could take a jackhammer to it?
But our biochemistry would not be pathogens to it; we could not infect them as was the case in War of the Worlds.
Source: Universe Today
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
5 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
3 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
3
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
5 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
11
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
41
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
I would like to see an interview with an astrochemist together with an astrobiologist.
Carbon- based life is prevalent on Earth only because the Chemistry supports it. The atmosphere, the soil, water, nutrients are all geared to evolve LIFE AS WE KNOW IT. Any life as we DON'T know it can still exist elsewhere whether we want it to or not and whether we like it or not. We are too well ensconced in our little circle of friends and family, strangers and the general world's population and basically, that's ALL we know. It takes an astrobiologist and/or astrochemist to understand that the Sun doesn't revolve around carbon-based life, and that there are more wonders in the Universe to discover and get used to.
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (10)
Dorminey - IS THE CRUX OF THE PROBLEM THAT SILICON-BASED LIFE WOULD BE SO SLOWLY REPLICATING THAT IT COULD NEVER MAKE IT IN A DYNAMIC UNIVERSE?
Bernstein - RPG! WE'VE BEEN HIT! BRACE FOR IMPACT! SORRY WHAT WAS THE QUESTION AGAIN?
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (12)
:)
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
Only in the internet age has that somehow become viewed as being "rude".
All caps is just another form of emphasis or grouping, and it happens to be much easier on the eyes than stupid crap like italics.
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (11)
The fact that another 2 elements have recently been added to the Table of Elements should have humbled researchers with the realization that they do NOT know everything there is to know yet. Most people can see the biodiversity on our own planet, albeit carbon-based, and are able to accept and even celebrate the differences between species. But a whole other chemical makeup of a silicon-based life form, even if it resembles an octopus, would be less likely deemed to be real. Acceptance of a new concept is difficult for some, and impossible for others.
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 3.1 / 5 (121)
The periodic table PREDICTS those elements, which were artificially created in a lab years after they were PREDICTED. You obviously miss the entire concept of the periodic table if you think you made a valid point there.
Those elements were created by the scientists you claim believed they didn't exist. Maybe they didn't believe they existed until you know, THEY CREATED THEM.
Also, if you would have paid attention during that episode of Star Trek that posits silicon based life, they say it'd have to occur on a planet totally devoid of carbon. Sorry this is not Mars or any planet yet known.
Is it possible that there is non-carbon based life? Sure. Has any been observed in even the most fleeting manner? No. No. No.
Let me pontificate for pages about ununquadium based life. Know-it-alls!!!
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
I agree that's it's for emphasis. . .particularly for those who can't read and comprehend easy sentences and paragraphs and who consistently MISQUOTE other people because of that lack of comprehension skills. . .I use Caps often to emphasize. . .it usually works, except for certain people who can't even comprehend that. LOL
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 3.1 / 5 (116)
This topic: http://www.physor...ion.html
provides a few good examples of Pirouette's all caps nonsense.
Please don't MISQUOTE other people Pirouette.
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (13)
Dec 21, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (111)
Well he's not emulating me, just his projection of himself onto me.
Very sad.
http://www.physor...rouette/
Also Moderators, please remove the above post by Pirouette for "CROSS POSTING" or maybe "OFF TOPIC". Up to you guys :)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Side note:
I also gather then, that silicon-based life would have more weight with less functionality? Thus any silicon-based life, if at all possible, would live in restrictive niches - extremophiles of sorts. Since no planet is likely free of carbon (a chemist would have to tell us which offers the more efficient energy pathway), a silicon-based life is unlikely to exist as dominant life form (and thus no intelligent silicon-based life - or far less likely.)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
http://aetherwave...ife.html
If you want to consider the spontaneous life formation, they physics should help as much as possible to the chemistry. For example, IMO the life evolved at the coastal areas instead of surface of ocean, because just the interface of three phases provides the maximal complexity required. IMO there is nothing anthropocentric on this view.
The silicon life could evolve only under circumstances, when its chemistry would become richer, than the carbon chemistry, but I cannot imagine such a situation.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I try and support you but i keep on remembering that you belive giant transparent aliens and Dune worms live on Mars.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (12)
They do. . . .but it takes a special announcement from the powers that be that they are there, for people like you to accept anything so alien and anti-anthropocentric as life forms on another world that are not carbon-based like yourself. It's a common thing. If you heard it from CNN or NBC. . .even NPR. . .you probably would be more likely to accept it. But it's not going to be announced. . .too much funding is at stake each year. We're used to it. No big deal.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
You have to understand that silicon-based means just that. Silicon BASED. But there would have to be other elements involved and combinations thereof to give the life form mobility, and possibility of intelligence. For us, carbon in itself does not give us mobility and intelligence since it's only ONE element like coke, charcoal, etc.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (56)
What's the problem, Frank? You can dish it out but can't take the same directed at you? EVERYONE knows you have at least 10 screen names and rate yourself 5's. K. You're not fooling anyone,... it is clear by examining your profile. Grow up. You're are a hypocrite and are dishonest, and should have been banned long ago.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
Just like you look for any other life. Look for something that actively stays in a state not compatible with entropy when put in a new environment (at the expense of increasing entropy elsewhere. Life, of course, doesn't violate entropy - it just shifts the local balance).
That really depends on what you term a 'restrictive niche'. If they live deep underground then the volume where such life could be possible would be enormous (3D) compared to the small biofilm (2D) that represents our type of life on a planetary surface.
Compared to that carbon based life would exist in a (very) restrictive niche.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (111)
No, I do not engage in such things. You are libeling me. Stop it.
Now let's pretend it isn't you making all those accounts in an attempt to make me look bad. Let's pretend it's neither of us and you are honestly convinced it is me.
You are a hypocrite for supporting Pirouette in the same behavior you stalk me around this site for supposedly engaging in.
You are pathetic. How about calling him out on his claim that we just aren't looking for silicon-based life ON EARTH hard enough. You really think that is reasonable?
Keep supporting your drooling buddy there.
Pirouette2 is also voting you up a bit. Sure that isn't you?
You're pathetic and dishonest. Go away
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (59)
Dude you really have a mental disorder. You make for a perfect liberal thinker, dishonest, falsification of reality.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (111)
Right, someone that disagrees with you must fit neatly into some "other" group, possess a mental disorder, and have 10 accounts to explain your abysmal ratings on this site.
I never sent you a PM stating anything of the sort. I've sent you PMs before because you're a little whiner that gets all bent out of shape over it. I called you a racist once over a PM because you called me a "GODDAMN N----R LOVER" over PM.
You're angry someone called you out on some horribly racist BS you said. The most recent example would be your reinstatement of poll tests via the repeal of the Voting Rights Act. You, admittedly, did not say you wanted to repeal the Voting Rights Act, but hey, that's a must if you want poll tests.
You're a pitiful racist that is mad you got called out on it.
Go away.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (87)
What is unfortunate is that other than your maturity level and dishonesty, I don't find many of your post unreasonable.
In the quantum thread you backed up GhostOfOtto even though his position was obviously absurd and irrelevant,.. only to "be against me" and add another voice against me, like grizled, you do not explain where I'm wrong, even though I request this,.. because you are disinterested in the topic apart from effecting negative posts against me. This just makes you look bad.
I don't on the other hand feign support of other posters wrong conclusions just to be against you.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (87)
This is an outright lie. You've tried this same tactic recently against Pirouette.
I encourage the moderators to request my password which I will provide to them so they can see that FrankHerbert is a slanderer and should be immediately banned.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (41)
Actually, I have only one user name, and that's Pirouette. My girlfriend though up that name when she joined Physorg. But I convinced her to let ME use the name instead. After she read Frankfart's posts, she told me that he is one very insane and insecure character. I concurred.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (39)
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (39)
FrankHerbfart compared ME to that little boy that he bullied on the school bus, and I realized that FrankH is always trying to relive his past as a bully by attempting to bully other members of Physorg. HE is a classical case of the bully that lives on in the "adult". It's all in the Psychology books what his mental condition is.
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (39)
http://www.bullyo...rial.htm
http://www.uncomm...lly.html
The above links illustrate how people like FrankHerbert operate with his obvious desire to bully other people into submitting to him.
Now back to the silicon-based alien topic. . . . .
Dec 22, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (88)
This is not the first time the troll has charged racism though. Here is a previous PM I sent to him in response at that time.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
http://www.apa.or...dex.aspx
http://faculty.wa...hiz.html
The above links illustrate how people like Pirouette operate with his obvious desire to bully other people into submitting to his schizophrenic ravings.
Now back to the silicon-based alien topic. . . . .
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (110)
"If I'm lying God strike me down!"
You know they will never respond because they haven't banned YOU yet. I know I'm not the only person who has complained directly to the moderators about your puppet accounts and offensive posts. Your continued posting proves they don't care. You are very dishonest.
You never sent me that PM. However you did send me this one.
The censoring is mine :(
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
Once again the censoring is mine :(
Noumenon is quite the self-loather to rail all day against behavior he exhibits... all day.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (39)
That's strange. . .there is NO PIROUETTE2 in this thread or in any other thread that I've been to,
Since I ONLY HAVE one user name, and that is PIROUETTE, who is this #2 that is so similar to MY name? I think that only FrankHerbert would know the answer to that. It must be one of his sockpuppets that he uses to downgrade other peoples' scores or to upgrade his own. Now why would FrankHerbert do a thing like that, AND HOW WOULD HE KNOW ABOUT A PIROUETTE2 UPGRADING OR DOWNGRADING SCORES UNLESS it is HIM.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
"Pirouette2 is also voting you up a bit. Sure that isn't you?
You're pathetic and dishonest. Go away"
THIS IS VERY VERY STRANGE. In order to know who is voting up or down, it would have to be the owner of that user name that is doing the up or down votes. Now I KNOW that the user name PIROUETTE2 is definitely NOT from Noumenon, therefore it must belong to FRANKHERBERT, since he is the one who knows all about what the name is doing.
This link below is a true description of FrankHerbert as a "serial bully" who also tries to TWIST everything around to make it looks HE is innocent of wrongdoing in the threads and sending nasty PMs to members and telling lies about them.
http://www.bullyo...rial.htm
I hope everyone reads the link's page. It describes FrankHerbert perfectly.
I don't know if there are any others on Physorg who are like him, but I certainly hope not.
I like the idea of silicon-based aliens on Mars. That is so cool.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (87)
You accused Pirouette of making that same exact remark,... you're so stupid that you can't even lie well.
Here is a screen capture of those two PM's; Again the Mod's have permission to review all PM's between FrankHerbert and me. You are simply lucky that they have better things to do,.. for now.
http://i859.photo...FHPM.jpg
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (56)
LOL, just recently. Obviously YOU did that so you could make that claim. Seriously, I thought you were at least in your 30's,.. how old are you? Are you like 17?
You accuse others of the exact thing you are doing. You are just like a typical leftist political hack. I'm thinking you may work for the Huffington Post.
Btw, the above link of a screen capture of my PM's with you, show clearly a number of things,
1) You admit to having multiple screen names, even calling me "fagamenon".
2) You slanderously edited my pm by included a racist comment.
3) You did receive the PM from me above, where I scolded you on the abuse of the charge of racism.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (86)
Really, here is a link to another thread with a similar discussion nearly three months ago,....
http://www.physor...ogy.html
Again, you attempt to hang the racism charge around peoples neck. Readers can decide for themselves at this point.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (86)
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (110)
Are your deductive reasoning abilities really that bad? I guess you thought no one would notice and this is your ace in the hole? Like all your pathetic arguments?
Anyone is free to look at your profile http://www.physor...activity and see the direct 5's you've received, and if they are obscured through other votes, it's fairly obvious when you have a '3' with Me, Otto, someone reasonable listed and Pirouette2 listed, you really think that's privy knowledge that Pirouette2 gave you a 5?
You think everyone is as stupid as you, huh?
@Noumenon
I thought 30-year-olds couldn't be liberal?! Your models suck as much as your opinions.
That's YOUR quote of a pm YOU said YOU sent. I never received that message because you made it up back then. Like you make puppet accounts for later.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (10)
http://www.bullyo...rial.htm
I posted this link already further up, but I think it's very pertinent to this problem of FrankHerbert's behavior and false accusations in the threads in which he encounters me, Noumenon and several other members. For quite a while, I could not understand why anyone could BE that way to total strangers on an internet website. . . .until I googled the words, ADULT BULLY and found many websites explaining that mental condition and explaining how to avoid such people. It describes that person who is bent on verbally attacking me and several others. . . by misquoting my comments and the comments of others, then using vulgarisms without provocation, and giving me all ONES as a score. I've said before that I don't understand this obvious obsession FrankHerbert has with increasing his scores dishonestly, but I believe that it is related to his mental illness. I'm sure he will twist this around and remove his name and replace it with mine. LOL
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (110)
Here is an example of a real post where I'll show how easily it is to see Pirouette2 is Pirouette giving himself 5s and it seems Noumenon 5s on every post.
Okay a score or 3.7 with Noumenon and orac rating in addition to Pirouette2. Noumenon always gives Pirouette 5s because he thinks I go around giving him 1s for no reason. It's some reactionary BS. I have no idea who orac is but he frequently gives a lot of people ones.
So (5 Noumenon 1 orac Pirouette2) = 3.66667 (3.7 is rounded up)
Pirouette2 = 5
This isn't hard.
I demand apologies from both of your for libeling me on this forum repeatedly.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (87)
You rated 5's with the Pirouette2 screen name recently, frank, including Otto because I recently debated him, ....just so you could claim it is mine or Pirouette, as now you are doing. You are not clever.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (56)
http://i859.photo...FHPM.jpg
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
Here is the ACTUAL message you sent me. Seems like you've learned how to use photoshop...
http://i41.tinypi...lf0i.png
Are you really that pathetic you have to forge PMs after your whole "I'M SENDING MY PASSWORD TO THE PHYSORG MODS SO THEY CAN STRAIGHTEN THIS OUT" bs. It's like an atheist screaming "GOD STRIKE ME DOWN!" Totally dishonest. Like your entire being.
I'm not getting into a match of images. It's stupid. You're behavior on this site is stupid. You are stupid for defending Pirouette just because you don't like me.
This will be the last image I post in response to any of your libeling. I doubt I'll need to. It speaks for itself.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
Just in case there is any doubt, anyone who cares should be aware of how much Pirouette dislikes Howhot and Deepsand because they occasionally agree with me about the either insanity or banality depending on the topic of Pirouette's posts.
http://www.physor...activity
http://www.physor...activity
Here's Otto's which Noumenon erroneously claims that I supposedly used Pirouette2 to give Otto's 5s because he was arguing with Noumenon.
http://www.physor...activity
Noumenon is quite good at projection, isn't he?
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (86)
I thought you would scramble to photoshop something. I just thought there was a chance you didn't have the software.
The difference, Frank, is that there is no God, ...but there ARE moderators and THEY CAN ABSOLUTELY determine who the slanderer is. I'll wait....
Lets agree on ONE thing at least, you don't post in response to me, nor rate me, and I will return the favour. How about it?
As I already said, YOU purposely rated GhostOfOtto all 1's so you can make the claim Pirouette2 is not you.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
I thought you didn't care about the ratings?
I can agree that if you refrain from being a hypocrite, I will refrain from engaging in the same just to spite you. I'm guessing your head is so far up your own @ss though you likely lack the self-awareness to actually admit any hypocritical behavior on your part.
Take Pirouette or Oliver to task and I might believe you. I might even gang up on Vendicar with you.
But I don't see it happening.
And Howhot and Deepsand and Myself and voted you and Pirouette up. Nah, I don't have the time for this BS. Maybe check the retired schizo with a government pension. He's likely your culprit.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (57)
I will continue to bug the moderators to examine our PM's to ban the slanderer.
I don't care about meaningless ratings now because of trolls like you and the Orac bot. My rating was 3.5 until you started applying 1's five at a time. I have positive ratings at the PhysForum, where an idiot like you wouldn't last a day.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
I invited him to party with my sicilian family and he wouldn't and must be a racist!. . .this is why he keeps callin us racists!
http://www.bullyo...rial.htm
Frankherbfart is just a ADULT BULLY that won'ts top fartin around on this site. IM TIRED OF IT!. . .BAN HIM!
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
LMAO just in case Pirouette tries to edit it out again. You are really awful at this whole sockpuppet business, aren't you Pirouette?
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (109)
Okay, so you aren't willing to admit any hypocrisy.
Do you understand the difference between slander and libel?
Also, do you care to say what in the image I provide proves it is altered upon zooming in? I wouldn't know because I didn't alter it and have little photoshop experience. Care to make a more specific claim or do you just want people like Pirouette to "see things" like they always do. I'm sure if Pirouette can find gelatinous romans on Mars he could easily find SOMETHING in there. Like "errant pixels" and other BS teabaggers claim to find in the President's long form birth certificate
What about your "image". It doesn't even look like you took a screenshot of a web-browser. It looks like you edited the HTML to say what you wanted and just had a web editor render the page, hence the lack of frames.
Anyway, like I said, my image speaks for itself, and Noumenon.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (57)
This will be resounding proof who is slandering who and being disruptive,.. so just leave it at that.
I've been posting here for four years and have never run into a troll like you,... other than the Antique troll Vendicar,... but even his childishness is mild in comparison from your new low.
Done.
Dec 23, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (10)
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
Morons like that don't understand restraint of civil behavior and Pirouette, with or without the 2, is clearly that sort of maroon. The last asshole that tried to sockpuppet me to this degree was Zephir and even he isn't stupid enough to do it anymore.
True the Dancer with Batshit for brains is stupid enough to keep it up but even after two days of this idiocy I still have the same rating without doing anything in response.
Go ahead moron. Keep it up. Even your ranking can get lower.
Ethelred
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (12)
Noumenon, while I think you are frequently full of shit it isn't batshit. Those two simply need to go.
Moderators
Please do your bleeding job. Things have gotten completely due to YOUR incompetence. Hire somebody with experience or at least authorize a few sub-moderators like most popular sites do.
After all this time you guys don't have a clue as to how run a forum where there are controversial discussions.
IF YOU CAN'T DO IT DELEGATE.
What is so bleeding difficult about it?
Here are links to sites where the owners don't have their heads stuffed or maybe you can only wring your hands.
http://www.scalzi...hatever/
http://apolyton.net/forum.php
http://forum.videohelp.com/
All are vastly superior to Physorg on this.
Ethelred
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
The lot of you deserve each other.
The rest of us don't. Don't go away mad.
Just go away.
Ethelred
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (9)
This I've got to see. As much as I find Vendi inflexibly opinionated at times, he is quite capable of ripping most of you to intellectual shreds. Please go ahead, show how dumb you can be .. poke a sleeping bear with a stick.
How about we all chill in 2012 and use this resource in a way that reflects your cognitive capacity. I will try harder to be reasonable and positive. Above all lets be tolerant and invoke a sense of humour without condescension .. anyone else want to start a new year with a good feeling?
Please.
Best thoughts to all for Xmas and hopefully a great 2012 here at Physorg.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (11)
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (83)
Ethelred doesn't agree wih me on anything, but he is honest. Hmmm, or maybe you can just retract your slander, now.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (83)
No, Pirouette2 might be FrankHerbert, Pirouette is not. Pirouette2 has started suspiciously massive rating campaign opposite to what FankHerbert would do normally, in order to convince us he doesn't have multiple screen names.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (7)
*Starts counting...*
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (39)
However, if there's a million dollar prize, I might get interested. :)
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (41)
Oh yeah. . .I did open ONE of them, and in it FrankHerbertfart said, "the angle of the dangle is equal to the square root of the mass of the ass".
And I thought to myself. . wait a minute, what the hell does that MEAN? Didn't feel like enquiring about it further, since I have better things to do.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
"keeping healthy and fit mentally" - from your profile. You are losing this battle. GET LOST.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (37)
I have NEVER bothered to respond to FH's response to MY post regarding the 2 elements. If he can't criticize my WHOLE comment with a valid criticism, he will cherry-pick the least important sentence to display how smart he is at catching a mistake by a non-scientist. All the rest of the time, he MISQUOTES my easy sentences and paragraphs, and then I have to point out to him that he misquoted me.
Evidently, FrankH hates to be corrected and will chase down those who corrected him and waits until his critic says something that FrankH doesn't like, then he pounces and tells lies about the person he wants to victimize, as though it's the end of the world if he doesn't get his revenge.
FrankHerbertfart is described perfectly in this link:
http://www.bullyo...rial.htm
He is a "serial bully" and has a new accomplice in TheGhostofOtto1923
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (9)
Obviously, TheGhost is NOT concerned about HIS OWN mental health, only with non-scientists who wish to learn from other Physorg members, such as Noumenon, ryggesogn2, bluehigh, Ethelred, Nerdyguy and many others who are truly knowledgeable about science. This seems to perturb Ghost for some reason. Perhaps he is jealous of Noumenon, Ethelred, bluehigh and all the rest because they have bested him in an argument in some thread. TheGhost appears to be a "control freak" for some reason. Perhaps he regards Physorg as his own property? Yes, that may be the reason why he insists that I leave Physorg when I'm learning so much.
What a shame that his behavior is reflecting so badly on Physorg and the other members other than FrankHerbert.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (86)
How is that helpful in reducing mayhem? You seem to be using the site as an insult competition. Just provide a counter argument, and end it.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
He means he likes big butts and does not lie...(sorry, couldn't help but throw that Sir Mix-A-Lot lyric in)... just simplifying the jargon... raters, please don't give this comment a '1', LOL.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Piro tried the sockpuppet thing a few days ago with CAM but was uncovered. So the brainteam invented piro2 replete with plausible deniability. HOW PATHETIC.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
My group and I have studied the NASA images from the HiRise camera, and have come to the conclusion that certain images are NOT all geology, but are living organisms that don't appear to be carbon-based. All we have are the images, nothing more, but those images are going against anthropocentric thought of humans and other Earth creatures being the only life forms in the solar system. . .maybe even the Universe. We think that is wrong.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
LOL. . .I'm giving you FIVE for that, hcl. . . .hehehehe. . .I like big mamas with a nice. . . .well anyway. . . .maybe you're right, I had no idea what he meant by that. jeeeez
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Like I said, I have only ONE user name and ONE computer. I recall seeing the user name CAM in the other thread where Ghost was going nuts again. He said that this "CAM" had just become a member of Physorg and then started berating him/her. I thought that was typical of Ghost and his boyfriend, FrankHerbertfart. . .picking on someone new.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
"""Bruce Dorminey IS IT WRONG TO ASSUME THAT LIFE COULD BE BASED ON SOMETHING OTHER THAN CARBON?
Max Bernstein Its important for us to keep an open mind about alien life, lest we come across it and miss it. On the other hand, carbon is much better than any other element in forming the main structures of living things."""
That is such an anthropocentric bias, along with an admonishment to be on the lookout for something unusual, even though carbon-based life (as we know it) is obviously superior to any other chemical combinations for life....but keep searching for aliens anyway, especially on Earth or with SETI.
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
Bernstein Its hard to imagine anything that would be more likely that silicon because there is nothing closer to carbon than silicon in terms of its chemistry. Its in the right place on the periodic table, just below carbon. On the face of it, [silicon-based life] doesnt seem too absurd since silicon, like carbon, forms four bonds. CH4 is methane and SiH4 is silane. They are analogous molecules so the basic idea is that perhaps silicon could form an entire parallel chemistry, and even life. But there are tons of problems with this idea."""
And those problems are that carbon - based life is superior chemically - again anthropocentric.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Er what line of reasoning?
Oh, I didn't see that bit, marvellously compact.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Cognitive and judgmental defects which are quickly eliminated in the wild are unfortunately left to flourish among humans.-They're left to degrade our lives with crude, empty suckup comments posted in floods as if this were Facebook. It's not. Go there.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (52)
I can't prove it but I think "Pirouette2" is actually FrankHerbert. I know for a fact that FrankHerbert has multiple screen names, given my PM's, and that he used to rate me multiple 1's, ...five or so at a time. Listed on my profile. He constantly rates me 1's without reading any of my posts. I only rate him 1's in return, as i said i would do via PM.
He is using "Pirouette2" to rate members accordingly as to claim Pirouette = Pirouette2, and obscure the fact that HE has abused the rating system with multiple screen names.
The screen name "Pirouette2" has only ever made 3 posts so far, and IMMEDIATELY after EACH of those three posts, FrankHerbert shows up to claim it is Pirouette. Also, in each thread FrankHerbert is the first to make reference to how "Pirouette2" is rating others.
http://medicalxpr...kin.html
http://www.physor...bon.html
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (83)
On the other hand FH was motivated to choose a similar screen (Pirouette2) to try and convince others it is Pirouette.
FrankHerbert has been rating GhostOfOtto1923 1's and me 5's, and the others accordingly to support the lie,.. while in the past Pirouette has never really engaged in mass rating campaigns.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
2) Who cares?
3) This piro person is the problem
A piro2 post:-Perhaps the denison frank is clever enough to use piro slurs against himself? Whatever.Because piro is incredibly dim.Im sure he is enjoying himself. And I am sure piro has always attracted assholes like a latrine. If she continues to post lying, brainless, chatty suckup facebook-type posts she will continue to be confronted. She posts nonsense without researching first, she will be ridiculed.
Such is the way of things, yes?
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
@rawa1, I read your "AWT and evolution of life". While interesting, it is still only about Terran functionality and mechanisms.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (40)
@Noumenon. . .I have asked one of the other member about how such a thing can be done.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (39)
""A piro2 post:
Frankherbert$hit wishes they would cure his hatred. . .No wonder he sleeps alone!
""
LOL. . . .that is too funny. . . .I didn't know that FrankHerbert$hit sleeps alone. That sure wasn't coming from ME.
And who are "they"?
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (85)
Whatever the method, he crossed the line when he said I made those racists comments. Pure slander. I will continue to request the moderators read my PM's to see zero racists remarks.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (84)
Did you turn yourselves in to the military police, for abandonment of another solder?! It's not too late.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
LOL. . . .when he did that to me, I KNEW that I had NEVER sent him any PMs. I didn't know him and he seemed like a nutcase, and I always try to avoid people like that. So when he slandered me in that thread and as soon as he did it, Howhot jumps on that and FALSELY accused me of being a bigot and a racist. At first I though she was talking about Rygg2, but then she was repeating MY word so I knew she was talking to me. Then to top it off, later on FrankHerbert starts typing the whole N word as though nobody is going to notice it. That's when I KNEW that he's either a black man, or a Liberal white guy OR just a plain insane person.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
We had thought of that, but the fact that he SAW us moving out and stood there like a statue instead of taking cover. . .he could have gotten us ALL killed. There was more of them than there was us. But he was rescued anyway and I guess he's still alive, but I don't know. He could have followed us out of the area, but he chose not to. And if we had to drag him kicking and screaming, we would all have been dead. You can't argue with a maniac. So we left him.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
See what it is. . . .he didn't CARE enough to be one of us. . .he thought he was better than us. There was just 10 of us and he refused to be a part of our group and didn't seem to mind putting all of us in danger. The other 9 guys and I would not have come home if we stopped to talk him into coming with us. The Cong were coming in fast. We had no time even to think.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (55)
You are a patriot for your service. While the left wing protested that war, my Uncle volunteered to go.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
Believe me, if your Uncle saw action like that and managed to stay alive. . .he was very brave, and he was not a fool. We were all brothers, you see. . .didn't matter what color, race or religion. And we all looked out for each othe
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (9)
Last year, I wrote my memoirs of what it was like over there. Maybe you might want to talk your Uncle into writing his memoirs also. This is something that should not be forgotten.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (38)
Sounds like TheGhostofOtto1923 got pussywhipped at some point in his life and thinks all guys are pussies like he is.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (37)
http://www.youtub...=related
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (83)
How did you determine that?
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (41)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
You guys should probably move to 4chan. That would be more appropriate.
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (41)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
-Uh how'd you do that? Like this?
http://www.youtub...XpLOYfog
-Sorry the good and the sane usually do win out:
http://www.youtub...=related
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (38)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
"Out of character" says Ghost. . .what character is Ghost talking about? I only HAVE ONE AND NO OTHER.
Oh wait. . .Ghost is looking for a woman that he can torture and mentally abuse. That's why he prefers a woman to argue with. It figures, since he is a weak sister himself. I think he got excited and almost had an orgasm when I threatened to find him. . .LOL
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (42)
Dec 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (86)
Looks like FrankHerbert switched from Pirouette2 to camshaft,... I guess he agreed with me that he wasn't making sense, with Pirouette2.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (11)
The only good killing on your part might be suicide.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Well antialias. . . .your friend TheGhost has followed me into yet another thread to spew his venom. I am surprised that you would align yourself with his/her irrational behavior.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
I find the possibility of silicon-based life forms intriguing and would like to see more threads about it.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (9)
You know what? He's not my friend.
As far as I can tell he occasionally posts good stuff. Mostly he posts BS. He's included in the 'crazies' category.
You, on the other hand, post BS non-stop.
Someone making death threats on the internet is really far, far gone over the insanity horizon (and still accelerating)
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (39)
I suppose he will keep on posting his BS and I will keep on ignoring her/him. A lot of members say that Ghost is a bullshit artist and pretends to know everything. I learn from a lot of people, but have never learned anything useful of science from him/her at any time.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
http://www.youtub...ure=fvsr
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
You know - that's so laughable.
I BET you have never threatened to kill anyone in real life and I BET that you have never followed through if you have made such a threat.
But on the internet anyone can make such a threat with impunity. On the net, the mask comes off. The things people don't dare to do in real life are exposed. And when that doesn't match their real life persona then only one conclusion can be made:
You are a pathetic whimp. Needing the shield of the web to feel strong.
Go away.
Grow up.
Get a life.
Dec 26, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (40)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Yeah, right...That's why I disagree with them so often...makes perfect sense....not.
Must be fun living in that conspiracy world of yours.
(Oh, BTW: your camshaft sockpuppet has been reported...wasn't particularly hard to figure out that that is one of yours).
So? Carrying a weapon and going into a war zone does not automatically make one right, moral, justified, or good. (In my book that makes one just stupid, easily manipulated, naive and kill crazy)
As noted I have done no such thing (NB. that I talked of 'crazies'...not singular but plural). But compared to you they are golden. However X being better than Y does not make X automatically good.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Or this is merely someone being clever by pretending to be a melodramatically stupid person in order to pwn us?
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
On the othr hand: He is a posterboy for the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (42)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (10)
Pretty obvious, that. Otherwise you'd have sussed why people immediately know it's you that made all these sockpuppets.
Pitiful. Just pitiful.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (84)
I'm pretty darn sure that Pirouette2 and camshaft is FrankHerbert. He is rating everyone accordingly to make it appear it is Pirouette.
I know for a fact that FrankHerbert has at least eight screen names and has been abusing the rating system, given my PM with him, and has falsely accused me and others of making specific racists comments. I've called on the moderators to inspect my PM's and ban him. See my profile to see FH sockpuppet harem.
It is interesting that no one seems to attack FrankHerbert for doing much worse than what you falsely accuse Pirouette of doing.
And No, I'm not sticking up for Pirouette here.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Just imagine. Him sitting in his mom's basement. Working for a long time. Finding all those posts. Ineffectively downvoting people. I never thought someone could be manipulated so simply into such infantile rage.
And the really good part is: it just shows how much my analysis of him being naive, childish and easily manipulated was spot on.
Man. This show is awesome :-)
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (84)
What doesn't matter, logic and reason? Based on what? How do you know its Pirouette? Just because you want it to be Pirouette, because you don't agree with him/her? If so, you are no different than FH.
I say it's FrankHerbert as Apoagogic,camshaft, and Pirouette2, based on his previous behavior with multi-screen names, and rating campaigns, which he basically admitted to via PM to me,.. and my analysis above.
I know that the follwing screen names are FrankHerberts. Is he childish, by your estimation?
RacistsCommieHypocrite ,iTwanker, Libtard, ryggesogn3, gregor2, CManhole82, DenseAetherTheory, Pirouline, PetiteAmerican, PaoloIlTipoBasso, Fagamemnon
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
UNLESS this is some troll who created the creature piro and is playing the physorg community. This would be easy to do except for the volume of piro posts and sockpuppet action. Hush 1 LOL hasnt been around lately. He seems to be the arty creative type with a distorted imagination and a lot of free time.
These are some thoughts which come to mind. No matter - otto is an easy mark. I will continue to slam the piro creature because I do not like BULLSHIT or lazy and SHE is full of both. Or thats the way SHE is created.
I had a cousin who was full of crap. He told you crazy stories and tried to cover them up with obvious lies. Wore a bad toupee.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
The female identity is important to understanding the claim that the boyfriend created the nick 'pirouette' - a ballet move? - and is also a tuffguy pottymouth who shows up to intimidate. 'Hey honey - what should we call our nick?' 'Well Im a ballerina...' -And this is a vet who spells Vietnam wrong?
And apparently piro forgets which one of them is the ufo buff with the website.
-Or it could be a kid in a basement. I would guess a college dropout with a long history on 4chan and such. Steals magazines from libraries. Kicked out of lulzsec.
Dec 27, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (84)
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (109)
Interestingly enough, I just googled "apoagogic" and well... I'll let you come to any conclusions. Otto, I'm sure you'll see what I'm talking about.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
No, because he has used that sockpuppet before (and actually admitted to it as far as I recall)
I haven't had a PM by Frank Herbert. But I really haven't had much to do with him. He's not my concern in this. And I have - to my recollection - never attacked him directly (and therefore I assume I'm not his concern, either ... I think it would be unlikely that he'd start downvoting me fo no reason whatsoever. But hey - my rating hasn't been affected one bit so what do I care?)
As I said: it doesn't matter. The sockpuppets will be deleted eventually - and all their ratings with it. It's just the wasted effort on his part that I find so funny.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (86)
Lame. You're only fooling other knuckleheads. What is certain is that you won't be able to fool the moderators once they read my PM's, troll.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (10)
Am I in on it? No. Whatever for?
Do I want to get rid of Pirouette? No. Much in the same way i don't want to get rid of Omatumr or rawa (or whatever he calls himself now). It's not my site. They have as much a right to be here as you or me.
Would I prefer that they not be here? Certainly. I'd really love if this was a site for SUBSTANTIVE discourse on science news by educated and interested laymen - and not so much a catchbasin for conspiracy theorists and people who have no clue.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
And if anything it's you...judging from your ratings Apogagoc and camshaft have been uprating you accross the board.
But. Meh. Whatever.
Some people certainly show their true infantile character when they can hide behind internet anonymity.
It's actually quite interesting because that explains a lot in real life (voting outcomes, mobbing, petty lawsuits...all the things you hear about but cannot believe actual grownups do)
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (85)
Oh, brother, #rolleyes. I guess you fell for FH's childish behavior hook line and sinker. See my profile for all the screen names FH has used to down rate me, five at a time, for months on end. FH has a history of abusing the rating system.
I have PM's where FH refered to me as "Fagamemnon" (one of his screen names).
When I asked him in a thread,... "What happened, did your other ten screen names get banned?" ,... He quoted the above and responded via PM, "Nope :)".
I really don't care, the only thing that irks me is the following;
Above, FH said, "I called you a racist once over a PM because you called me a "GODDAMN N----R LOVER" over PM.... You're angry someone called you out on some horribly racist BS you said.".
This is an outright lie, as there is nothing of the kind in any of my PM's, as the moderators can see for themselves.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
It'll go away. This whole sockpuppetry is ridiculous and it won't change a thing. If you make substantive posts you make substantive posts. If you make BS posts you make BS posts. When I rate (which is rarely) then I rate according to the quality of the post (mostly a thumbs up). But that's just a spontaneous thing for me. I really only vote down when something is (IMO) incredibly dumb or completely off topic (or spam).
But ultimately: having a rating of such-and-such on a post (end even moreso as an average on your profile) means nothing*. It means only something to those not able to make up their own minds - and those are the people that aren't worth the time of day on a science site, anyhow.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (86)
You say you "don't care", but you at least care enough to accuse me or pirouette.
My issue with FrankHerbert as outlined above is when he takes it a step further and accuses others of making racists remarks to him via PM. He did this with Pirouette, and made the mistake of doing it to me as follows;
I'm going to continue to bug the moderators to read my PM's so they can determine there is no such remarks, and that FrankHerbert is being disruptive to other members.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (87)
FrankHerbert
RacistsCommieHypocrite
iTwanker
Libtard
ryggesogn3
gregor2
CManhole82
DenseAetherTheory
Pirouline
PetiteAmerican
PaoloIlTipoBasso
Fagamemnon
Pirouette2
camshaft
Apoagogic
Much of this disruptive behavior can be eliminated by simply a) disabling the comment rating system entirely, or b) allowing ratings by donating members only.
Even better is a suggestion by Ethelred,.. pick some non-childish members (like Ethelred) to moderate these forums.
Oh, and get rid of orac already.
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
I rather suspect that the mods are not reading the posts on these threads (with a 6-7 man crew and about 100 new pieces on this site per day I find it likely that they are far too busy for that)
Simple IP comparisons should be able to tell whose sockpuppets they are - and consequently lead to the banning of the originating poster, a very unfriendly email by the mods and a permaban on the IP (or at least that is what I would do in such a case).
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (70)
Dec 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I don't care whether it's you, pirouette or the holy god almighty.
My wish would be for more competent, substantive and thoughtful posts on scientific subjects - that is all.
Whether someone goes on a ratings war couldn't be of less of an interest to me. When I find it I report it to the mods and that's it.
But the rage tirades in threads? I usually just skip over that.
here I butted in because I came to check on a thread that I had posted on...and noticed death threats being bandied about and people behaving completely immature - which is something that gets my goat because it does tend to spill over into other threads...which is something you're not innocent of.
I feel that this spoils what this site is (or should be) all about.