Plunge in CO2 put the freeze on Antarctica
Plunge in CO2 put the freeze on AntarcticaAtmospheric carbon dioxide levels plunged by 40% before and during the formation of the Antarctic ice sheet 34 million years ago, according to a new study. The finding helps solve a long-standing scientific puzzle and confirms the power of CO2 to dramatically alter global climate.
The study by an international team, published in the journal Science, is the first multidisciplinary research of its kind to show that CO2 was tracking global cooling at that time. It confirms that significant falls in the greenhouse gas result in global cooling, just as rises result in global warming.
Previous studies had suggested that atmospheric CO2 over the Southern Ocean was climbing during the Eocene to Oligocene climate transition, when ice first formed over Antarctica. This presented a conundrum, suggesting the climate was warming at the same time as Antarctica was freezing.
But when the vastly different ancient Southern Ocean currents and temperatures of that period were factored in, it quickly became apparent that Antarctica's big freeze followed a fall in CO2 levels.
The paper, "The Role of Carbon Dioxide During the Onset of Antarctic Glaciation", reinforces carbon dioxide's place as a primary driver for global temperatures. It was lead authored by Mark Pagani, of Yale University, and co-authored by University of NSW Climate Change Research Centre researcher Dr Willem Sijp.
"Our research recognised that the flows of deep ocean currents at the end of the Eocene were dramatically different from those of today because of the altered position and shape of continental masses," said Dr Sijp.
"Previous research relied on different temperature estimates and had also not taken these different currents into account. This led to significant upward biases in calculated CO2 which made it appear that carbon dioxide was actually increasing around the Southern Ocean as the Antarctic ice sheet formed. We can now see the reverse was true.
"We found a 40 percent CO2 decrease over a three million year period, in agreement with global cooling during that time.
"This decline was a critical condition for global cooling and the emergence of the Antarctic ice sheet. In short, the apparent increase of CO2 during Antarctic glaciation is refuted."
The nature of ocean currents is vital in calculating atmospheric CO2, because the estimates of atmospheric carbon dioxide are derived from measurements of molecules from algae deposited on the ocean floor at six ocean sites millions of years ago.
The fundamentally different circulation of the Southern Ocean during the Eocene directly affected the algae by changing the temperatures of these ocean currents and significantly lowering the nutrient load. This had a direct impact on the inferred CO2.
Provided by
University of New South Wales
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
20 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
3 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
3
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
5 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
11
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
41
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 0.7 / 5 (28)
Ah, you are referring to the Atlantians. They didn't freeze, they just took their advanced technology city under water where to this day they live in splendor and luxury like the Gungans.
You might watch this doumentary.
http://www.starwa...iew.html
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (3)
There is no evidence present about intelligent species present at 34 million years ago. Secondly we are not at 40% reduction situation now with CO2. The opposite is true. Currently CO2 is increasing at a rate newer seen in earths history. The change we have made with fossil fuels in last 200 years has previously taken thousands or millions of years. The slow rise was giving flora and fauna time to adjust, while now the change is too fast. Current level of CO2 should be reduced to pre-industrial levels as soon as possible. If not, we and life on earth will pay an ever increasing prize for it.
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (4)
Dec 01, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
The method measures C12/C13 ratios in fossilised plankton,ratios which are related to the amount of disolved CO2 in the WATER at the time of the planktons death.
Now, we all know warmer water 'acidifies' i.e disolves more CO2 in it, so how can you separate the falling Co2 in the water from falling temperature? How do we know CO2 wasnt precipitating from the water as it cooled towards freezing, rather than CO2 in the atmosphere dropping?
Dr Pagani may have an answer, but what is the evidence that the dropping of the C12 ratio before the ice formed wasnt caused by the water cooling towards freezing over time (it must have started cooling some time before becomming ice) and thus being able to dissolve less CO2? Pity the paper is behind a pay wall, would love to know.
As far as I can tell the alkenone method is a proxy for disolved CO2 in water, but doesnt say anything about CO2 in atmosphere.
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (25)
Hmmmm... Who am I to trust?
Expert scientists who spend their lives developing an area of expertise and prove that expertise through peer review publication? Or.....
Know nothing nobodies who spend 30 seconds working it out for themselves and get it wrong?
If you are a student, then ask questions but otherwise keep your ignorant mouth shut.
If you are a Denialist then just keep your ignorant mouth shut.
Either way your conduct fails.
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 0.4 / 5 (27)
Live sustainably or die.
Nature doesn't care about your preferences, and neither do the rest of us.
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Firstly - it appears that a number of the "climate experts" that comprise the IPCC are not actually experts in the fields that they are contributing to.
Secondly - it is a characteristic of proponents of global warming that they try to suppress dissenting viewpoints (just as you are doing). This is not an academically sound practice as it stifles constructive debate and discussion.
What gives you the right to tell anyone to "keep their ignorant mouth shut"?
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
During the middle ages "homo sapiens" did not observe even the most elementary hygenic measures. It is known today that the result of this behaviour resulted in the "black death" which reached its peak 1348 - 1350.
We don't crap on the front of our doorstep or the adjacent gutter anymore as our ancestors in Europe did. What we are doing now will effect not only ourselves but the whole of creation. I can understand that some individuals get to be haltless when spurred from the ignorance and stupidity of others, knowing quite well what the result of such behaviour worldwide will lead to in a relative short time span.
Sometimes I wish I could be just as ignorant and stupid as the majority of "homo sapiens" so that I could enjoy the same ease of mind when heading straight forward into disaster.
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Actually, that probably would not be sustainable, seeing as how having that many horses would pretty much double, if not triple the amount of grazing areas we would need for animals, and of course horses breathe and fart too, just like cattle, so they make CO2 and methane.
Not to mention it would take several decades, if not centuries, to breed enough horses to increase their populations to relevant levels for even one person per household to be able to ride a horse to work. Currently, there's probably only one horse for every hundred or several hundred people in the world.
Grazing area and feed for the horses is not practical, even if most people left cities and went back to rural living...which of course would destroy even more forests..
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
But you'll need at least 1 acre of grazing land per horse (or at least one acre of land "somewhere" to grow the food, even if the horse is in a stall and not grazing.)
Then all your work places and stores need stalls, ties, and corals(sp?) like in a damn western movie so you can keep your horse safe while you're at work or shopping, etc.
But yeah, it takes time, food, and pollution to make more of anything, including horses.
You'll have to cut down most of the existing forests on the planet to make room for grazing lands or otherwise additional feed crops for horses.
One horse per 4 people on Earth means you'd need 2.5 million square miles of ADDITIONAL grazing land, which is about 58 times the area of the State of Louisiana.
Any other bright ideas?
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Dec 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
@reformed optimist: The best way to respond to boorish commentary, such as VD, is simply read over it just as soon as you recognize it for what it is. He doesn't understand that Democracy was born in the minds of men because they had "questions". It's his opinion only certain people should be allowed to ask questions, that's his opinion, fortunately we live in a Democracy & the rest of us can whether VD likes it or not.
Dec 03, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Dec 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Warm the planet. Melt the unnatural ice cap.
WHATTYA WANT. NO MORE ICE!
WHEN DYA WANT IT? NOW!!
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (25)
If Antarctica were ice free it would remain an barren wasteland as all of the soil on the continent's interior has been scraped off of the continent by the action of Glaciers.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (25)
Are you telling me to keep my mouth shut Tard Boy?
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
If the antarctic were ice free the earth would have no means of temeprature regulation except astronomical winter and night time.
The heat of fusion of water is one of the strongest buffers to extreme temperature change, in this case extreme temperature rise.
If antarctica was ice free (Let's just assume in summer only, and at least any time soon and by any means other than continental drift over eons,) then the average albedo will be changed by about 5 to 10 points, and the average temperature of the planet would probably be tens of degrees CELSIUS hotter, and most life forms would be extinct.
By the time you melt Greenland and maybe 10% of antarctica, the air temperature and climate will become a serious threat to human existance.
Dec 04, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
It wasn't until about 15 million years ago that the ice cap was relatively complete.
Of course CO2 was much higher.
Dec 05, 2011
Rank: 0.3 / 5 (25)
It was? You should write a scientific paper on your discovery.
Meanwhile, back here in reality land...
In terms of the global average, temperatures were probably colder than present day (depending on estimates of latitude dependence and seasonality in response patterns). While temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere were warmer than average during the summers, the tropics and areas of the Southern Hemisphere were colder than average which comprised an average global temperature still overall lower than present day temperatures. - Link below
http://www.agu.or...24.shtml