Optimism on solar energy: Energy secretary suggests ways domestic firms can prosper

Dec 05, 2011 By Alvin Powell
U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu delivered the 2011 Bloch Lecture, “The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Solving the Energy Challenge,” and said that said the economic benefits of the emerging clean-energy industry will be reaped elsewhere if the business is not encouraged in the U.S. first. Credit: Rose Lincoln/Harvard Staff Photographer

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu struck an optimistic note about the future of solar energy Thursday but said the economic benefits of the emerging clean-energy industry will be reaped elsewhere if the business is not encouraged at home.

“Invented in America but made in China is not good enough,” Chu said. “Invented in America, made in America has to be the way to go.”

Chu said the global recession has hit the solar hard, decreasing demand that in turn has lowered prices for solar products. While the bankruptcy of California-based solar panel maker Solyndra has dominated headlines, the global difficulties of the industry have not gotten as much attention. Chinese solar panel makers have also been hard hit, Chu said, but they have been protected by the Chinese government to keep the industry there afloat.

Chu said analysts are certain the costs of solar panels will continue to drop over the coming decade, though they disagree whether they’ll fall by a factor of two or four. If they decline by a factor of four, Chu said, the panels will become competitive with energy produced by all other fuels.

China, Chu said, has “Henry Ford-ed” the U.S. with respect to solar panels. With the automobile and internal combustion engine, Ford took others’ inventions and perfected a way to make the automobile plentiful and affordable through his assembly lines.

China today is taking advances made elsewhere in solar cell technology and becoming a world leader in solar panel production. In the United States, investment into clean energy as a percentage of overall sales is far below that in other industries, 0.3 percent compared with 18 percent for the pharmaceutical industry, for example.

Chu said the United States maintains a technological lead, with some promising technologies being developed in its labs. Whether those advances are commercialized in the U.S. or elsewhere remains to be seen.

Chu delivered the 2011 Bloch Lecture, “The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Solving the Energy Challenge,” in Harvard’s Northwest Laboratory Building. Sponsored by the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, the lecture is named for pioneering biochemist Konrad Bloch, who served as Harvard’s Higgins Professor of Biochemistry from 1954 to 1982 and was one of the founders of the Committee on Higher Degrees in Biochemistry.

Chu said that science and technology are poised to deliver the world from its environmental problems, as they have done several times before. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, for example, there were widespread concerns about agricultural land becoming exhausted and crop yields declining. In response, saltpeter and guano mining began, providing nitrogen to replenish the soil. That also began a race to develop artificial fertilizers. The result of that race boosted crop yields and secured the world’s food supply for decades until, in the 1960s, new crop strains were developed that again boosted food supplies and avoided the mass starvation that some had predicted.

The rapid adoption of the automobile occurred in the face of another environmental problem: from horse manure, Chu said. With transportation largely provided by horses through the late 1800s and early 1900s, major cities had enormous manure disposal problems. That situation helped to drive the rapid adoption of the automobile over just 25 or 30 years, Chu said.

Government support was important to the development of the airplane industry, Chu said. The government’s first effort to subsidize aircraft development failed and was eclipsed by the privately funded Wright brothers. Though the Wrights were American, early aircraft development was dominated by overseas countries.

By the beginning of World War I, the United States was 14th in government expenditures on airplanes, behind Greece and Brazil, Chu said. In 1925, however, Congress allowed private airlines to carry the mail, providing an economic boost to the domestic industry, and by the middle of World War II, the U.S. aircraft industry was globally competitive.

Like Ford, Chu said, some American entrepreneurs are innovators in clean energy, not through new technology but through their business models. One such company is Arizona-based Simply Solar. Realizing that solar-panel financing and purchase is dizzyingly complex, with not only different types of panels that can be installed, but also with an array of government tax credits, Simply Solar offers to rent homeowners panels at a guaranteed cost below their current electricity rates, leaving all the installation and financing headaches to the company. After adopting that model, Chu said, the company saw monthly sales rise to what they previously were in a year.

Chu also addressed other technological advances, such as the computer chip, the cellphone, batteries, and biofuels. In some cases, other nations are capitalizing on American inventions, and he called the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs overseas “very alarming.”

The answer, Chu said, may be for U.S. companies to take a longer view in making strategic decisions. While some firms do that today, he said, not enough do so. An increase in energy produced from domestic sources — through and growth in local sources of fuels like natural gas — will not only generate American jobs, but will keep the wealth generated by those companies in this country instead of exporting U.S. dollars.


This story is published courtesy of the Harvard Gazette, Harvard University’s official newspaper. For additional university news, visit Harvard.edu.

Explore further: Fukushima accepts 'temporary' radioactive waste storage

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Chu: New materials could be transformative

Dec 02, 2011

In a talk rich with historical examples, U.S. Secretary of Energy Steven Chu made a strong case Wednesday that the right policies — and concerted efforts by the nation’s engineers and scientists — could once ...

Wind, solar becoming cost competitive: Chu

Mar 23, 2011

Clean sources of energy such as wind and solar will be no more expensive than oil and gas projects by the end of the decade, US Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday.

US, China launch clean energy research initiative

Nov 17, 2010

US Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Wednesday the United States and China had launched a joint clean energy initiative -- one of the largest research collaborations between two countries in the world.

Obama White House to install solar panels

Oct 05, 2010

President Barack Obama's administration said Tuesday it will install solar panels on the White House in a bid to encourage Americans in lesser known residences to embrace renewable energy.

Biden calls for new clean energy policy for US

Aug 30, 2011

(AP) -- The United States can't lead the world in the 21st century with its current energy policy, Vice President Joe Biden told alternative technology supporters Tuesday at a clean energy summit in Las Vegas.

Recommended for you

Future solar panels

4 hours ago

Conventional photovoltaic technology uses large, heavy, opaque, dark silicon panels, but this could soon change. The IK4-Ikerlan research centre is working with the UPV/EHU-University of the Basque Country ...

Storing solar energy

Sep 01, 2014

A research project conducted by Leclanché S.A., the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Romande Energie and with the financial support of the Canton of Vaud could bring a real added value in ...

Scientists get set for simulated nuclear inspection

Sep 01, 2014

Some 40 scientists and technicians from around the world will descend on Jordan in November to take part in a simulated on-site inspection of a suspected nuclear test site on the banks of the Dead Sea.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CapitalismPrevails
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 05, 2011
If we want to be optimistic about solar power than we need to level the playing field with China and toss minimum wage laws. Let the laborers compete directly with the employers for wages.
kochevnik
1 / 5 (2) Dec 05, 2011
If we want to be optimistic about solar power than we need to level the playing field with China and toss minimum wage laws.
Good deal for the Chinese!
Nerdyguy
5 / 5 (1) Dec 05, 2011
If we want to be optimistic about solar power than we need to level the playing field with China and toss minimum wage laws. Let the laborers compete directly with the employers for wages.


I'm pretty sure we can be optimistic about solar without the need to do anything at all to labor laws. The technology is solid, it keeps getting better, and the U.S. has good reasons both financially and from a strategic defense point of view to do anything we can to wean ourselves off oil. As the Chinese standard of living continues to improve, a natural by-product will be the demands of its people for higher wages, which will also help level the playing field. But, it's not all about China. I'm more concerned about what we're going to do in the U.S.
Pirouette
1 / 5 (2) Dec 06, 2011
The Red Chinese regard their own people as an expendable commodity who should be grateful to have a job at all. They have no unions and strikes and walkouts are punishable offenses. The Communist government keep a tight rein on the workers and there are no lazy slackers in China. Compare the worker situation in China with those in the U.S. and it's easy to understand why the jobs are over there instead of here. Solar energy is great but IMHO the industry and technology needs a whole lot more improvement even though solar panels are a lot cheaper from China.
U.S. made solar panels may be just as good as Chinese made, or better, but the cost is prohibitive due to American union demands for higher wages than Chinese workers earn. American companies pass the cost of paying those high wages on to the customers, and the customers then refuse to pay the high cost of solar panels and paraphernalia. Nothing can be done about this situation until wages are either lowered or simply not raised
Pirouette
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 06, 2011
American workers already are protected for good, if not excellent working conditions, health benefits, decent wages, OSHA, etc., all at the expense of the employers. But somehow, the unions don't consider it enough and demand so much more. The Chinese consider American workers as spoilt and don't deserve what they have. . . . .and they have so little in comparison. From what I've seen in my travels around the U.S., American workers don't like having to live within their means, and the unions cater to them by forcing employers to pay exorbitant wages, rather than pay what the particular job is worth.
In the meantime, customers would like to buy American made solar panels, but can't afford the high cost and stay on the grid instead. It's a lose-lose situation and is the fault of the government-backed unions.
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (2) Dec 06, 2011
I agree with the American Capitalist. Lowering American wages to 1 to 3 dollars a day is the only way Americans can compete on against the Chinese.

"we need to level the playing field with China and toss minimum wage laws. " - CapitalismFailes

rawa1
1 / 5 (1) Dec 06, 2011
Apparently solar industry is already so big business already, so it ignores the cold fusion findings in the same way, like the fossil fuel and nuclear industry (1kg Ni has energy equivalence of 200 000kg oil with only 2 refuelings/year under continous run).

http://ecat.com/e...lculator
rawa1
1 / 5 (1) Dec 06, 2011
Report about cold fusion technology from NASA from latest LENR-Workshop

http://newenergyt...shop.pdf
http://newenergyt...shop.pdf