The onset of electrical resistance

Dec 21, 2011
Electrons (blue balls) and holes (red balls) show random thermal motion before the terahertz pulse hits the sample. Copyright: MBI

Researchers at the Max-Born-Institute, Berlin, Germany, observed the extremely fast onset of electrical resistance in a semiconductor by following electron motions in real-time.

When you first learned about , you may have asked how the electrons in a solid material move from the negative to the positive terminal. In principle, they could move ballistically or ‘fly’ through the solid, without being affected by the atoms or other charges of the material. But this actually never happens under normal conditions because the electrons interact with the vibrating atoms or with impurities. These collisions typically occur within an extremely short time, usually about 100 femtoseconds (10-13 seconds, or a tenth of a trillionth of a second). So the electron motion along the material, rather than being like running down an empty street, is more like trying to walk through a very dense crowd. Typically, electrons move only with a speed of 1m per hour, they are slower than snails.

Though the electrons collide with something very frequently in the material, these collisions do take a finite time to occur. Just like if you are walking through a crowd, sometimes there are small empty spaces where you can walk a little faster for a short distance. If it were possible to follow the electrons on an extremely fast (femtosecond) time scale, then you would expect to see that when the battery is first turned on, for a very short time, the electrons really do fly unperturbed through the material before they bump into anything.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
Motion of electrons (blue) and holes (red) in an electric field

This is exactly what scientists at the Max-Born-Institute in Berlin recently did in a semiconductor material and report in the current issue of the journal Physical Review Letters [volume 107, 256602 (2011)]. Extremely short bursts of terahertz light (1 terahertz = 1012 Hz, 1 trillion oscillations per second) were used instead of the battery (light has an electric field, just like a battery) to accelerate optically generated free electrons in a piece of gallium arsenide. The accelerated electrons generate another electric field, which, if measured with femtosecond time resolution, indicates exactly what they are doing. The researchers saw that the electrons travelled unperturbed in the direction of the electric field when the battery was first turned on. About 300 femtoseconds later, their velocity slowed down due to collisions.

In the attached movie, we show a cartoon of what is happening in the gallium arsenide crystal. Electrons (blue balls) and holes (red balls) show random thermal motion before the terahertz pulse hits the sample. The (green arrow) accelerates electrons and holes in opposite directions. After onset of scattering this motion is slowed down and results in a heated electron-hole gas, i.e., in faster thermal motion.

The present experiments allowed the researchers to determine which type of collision is mainly responsible for the velocity loss. Interestingly, they found that the main collision partners were not atomic vibrations but positively charged particles called holes. A hole is just a missing electron in the valence band of the semiconductor, which can itself be viewed as a positively charged particle with a mass 6 times higher than the electron. Optical excitation of the generates both free electrons and holes which the terahertz bursts, our battery, move in opposite directions. Because the holes have such a large mass, they do not move very fast, but they do get in the way of the , making them slower.

Such a direct understanding of electric friction will be useful in the future for designing more efficient and faster electronics, and perhaps for finding new tricks to reduce .

Explore further: First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Two graphene layers may be better than one

Apr 27, 2011

( -- Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have shown that the electronic properties of two layers of graphene vary on the nanometer scale. The surprising new results ...

Electron ping pong in the nano-world

Apr 25, 2011

( -- An international team of researchers succeeded at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics to control and monitor strongly accelerated electrons from nano-spheres with extremely short and ...

Recommended for you

First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives

13 hours ago

While creating the first-ever images of explosives using an x-ray free electron laser in California, Los Alamos researchers and collaborators demonstrated a crucial diagnostic for studying how voids affect ...

New approach to form non-equilibrium structures

Jul 24, 2014

Although most natural and synthetic processes prefer to settle into equilibrium—a state of unchanging balance without potential or energy—it is within the realm of non-equilibrium conditions where new possibilities lie. ...

Nike krypton laser achieves spot in Guinness World Records

Jul 24, 2014

A set of experiments conducted on the Nike krypton fluoride (KrF) laser at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) nearly five years ago has, at long last, earned the coveted Guinness World Records title for achieving "Highest ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 21, 2011
Holes I was familiar with, the movement I was not. Why do they move in opposite directions ? I thought when the electron moves to a higher state it leaves a hole behind.
3.3 / 5 (16) Dec 22, 2011
They do not really "move" (relative to the atoms), but the forced constant flow/exchange (hop in & out) of electrons creates a pattern of negative charge deficit aka "holes" (missing valence electrons), which when viewed from external perspective looks like it is "moving" in the opposite direction than the electrons.

Or in other words - as the electrons (negative charge) hop from atom to atom, the pattern progression of the resulting negative deficit (positive charge) is moving in the opposite direction.

Electrons and "holes" mutually attract, and the resulting energy loss from the electron shuffle & re-capture process plays a major role in defining the electrical properties of a material.

When an electron is "knocked out" or re-captured, part of its momentum is transfered to the atom nuclei, which in the whole picture manifests as thermal losses - as thermal energy is, in essence, just the internal kinetic ("vibrational") energy of the atoms/molecules that make up the material.
3.3 / 5 (16) Dec 22, 2011
The last paragraph came through a bit rough, so I better re-word it:
When an electron is "stripped" or re-captured, some energy is extracted from the electric field (through the electron) and transferred to momentum (kinetic energy) of the atoms nuclei by EM interraction between the electron and the nuclei (i.e. binding energy), which in the whole picture essentially manifests as thermal losses (as thermal energy = internal kinetic energy).
not rated yet Dec 22, 2011
Wow, thanks for the explanation. The wiki page on it is confusing because it says that the electron leaves a hole that becomes spread over hundreds of unit cells in the lattice of the material, it just sounds counter-intuitive that that would create resistance. Thanks again.
1 / 5 (1) Dec 22, 2011
This is more realistic analogy of charges and holes motion in thin superconducting film http://www.youtub...qO5zPmvU
not rated yet Dec 22, 2011
Nice video, thanks. Fascinating actually. It looks so much like a film you'd see in a biology class,.....reminds me of the observations that J.C. Bose made studying electrical response in various materials.