NASA's RXTE detect 'heartbeat' of smallest black hole candidate (w/ video)
Image: NASA
(PhysOrg.com) -- An international team of astronomers has identified a candidate for the smallest-known black hole using data from NASA's Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). The evidence comes from a specific type of X-ray pattern, nicknamed a "heartbeat" because of its resemblance to an electrocardiogram. The pattern until now has been recorded in only one other black hole system.
Named IGR J17091-3624 after the astronomical coordinates of its sky position, the binary system combines a normal star with a black hole that may weigh less than three times the sun's mass. That is near the theoretical mass boundary where black holes become possible.
Gas from the normal star streams toward the black hole and forms a disk around it. Friction within the disk heats the gas to millions of degrees, which is hot enough to emit X-rays. Cyclical variations in the intensity of the X-rays observed reflect processes taking place within the gas disk. Scientists think that the most rapid changes occur near the black hole's event horizon, the point beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape.
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This animation compares the X-ray 'heartbeats' of GRS 1915 and IGR J17091, two black holes that ingest gas from companion stars. GRS 1915 has nearly five times the mass of IGR J17091, which at three solar masses may be the smallest black hole known. A fly-through relates the heartbeats to hypothesized changes in the black hole's jet and disk. Credit: NASA
Astronomers first became aware of the binary system during an outburst in 2003. Archival data from various space missions show it becomes active every few years. Its most recent outburst started in February and is ongoing. The system is located in the direction of the constellation Scorpius, but its distance is not well established. It could be as close as 16,000 light-years or more than 65,000 light-years away.The record-holder for wide-ranging X-ray variability is another black hole binary system named GRS 1915+105. This system is unique in displaying more than a dozen highly structured patterns, typically lasting between seconds and hours.
"We think that most of these patterns represent cycles of accumulation and ejection in an unstable disk, and we now see seven of them in IGR J17091," said Tomaso Belloni at Brera Observatory in Merate, Italy. "Identifying these signatures in a second black hole system is very exciting."
In GRS 1915, strong magnetic fields near the black hole's event horizon eject some of the gas into dual, oppositely directed jets that blast outward at about 98 percent the speed of light. The peak of its heartbeat emission corresponds to the emergence of the jet.
Changes in the X-ray spectrum observed by RXTE during each beat reveal that the innermost region of the disk emits enough radiation to push back the gas, creating a strong outward wind that stops the inward flow, briefly starving the black hole and shutting down the jet. This corresponds to the faintest emission. Eventually, the inner disk gets so bright and hot it essentially disintegrates and plunges toward the black hole, re-establishing the jet and beginning the cycle anew. This entire process happens in as little as 40 seconds.
While there is no direct evidence IGR J17091 possesses a particle jet, its heartbeat signature suggests that similar processes are at work. Researchers say that this system's heartbeat emission can be 20 times fainter than GRS 1915 and can cycle some eight times faster, in as little as five seconds.
Astronomers estimate that GRS 1915 is about 14 times the sun's mass, placing it among the most-massive-known black holes that have formed because of the collapse of a single star. The research team analyzed six months of RXTE observations to compare the two systems, concluding that IGR J17091 must possess a minuscule black hole.
"Just as the heart rate of a mouse is faster than an elephant's, the heartbeat signals from these black holes scale according to their masses," said Diego Altamirano, an astrophysicist at the University of Amsterdam in The Netherlands and lead author of a paper describing the findings in the Nov. 4 issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
The researchers say this analysis is just the start of a larger program to compare both of these black holes in detail using data from RXTE, NASA's Swift satellite and the European XMM-Newton observatory.
"Until this study, GRS 1915 was essentially a one-off, and there's only so much we can understand from a single example," said Tod Strohmayer, the project scientist for RXTE at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "Now, with a second system exhibiting similar types of variability, we really can begin to test how well we understand what happens at the brink of a black hole."
Launched in late 1995, RXTE is second only to Hubble as the longest serving of NASA's operating astrophysics missions. RXTE provides a unique observing window into the extreme environments of neutron stars and black holes.
Provided by NASA
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Distance of planets from stars and revolution
6 hours ago
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
3 hours ago |
3.7 / 5 (3) |
3
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
5 hours ago |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
11
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
5 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
41
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages
Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
Dec 15, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Queue dramatic music:
Dom...dom...dom...DOOM.
How is it we need an artists conception anyway?
Where the heck is the real image?
Dec 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm sorry to tell you, they don't have a photo.
Dec 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
They could've at least done something in infrared, so you could see something from the accretion disk or something.
Dec 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
There's a waiting list of a whole year. You will need to send in your application now. The cost is $10.00 payable in check or money order. Infrareds are slightly higher.
Dec 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (16)
Actually my friend in Florida, Dr. David Fisher, published the first photo of a black hole several years ago in a novel about a university scientist.
Black holes are, of course, as imaginary as black magic.
Neutron repulsion [1,2] causes:
a) Massive neutron stars to appear as the mysterious 'Garden-sprinkler' nebula:
www.spacetelescop...ic0308a/
b) Less massive neutron stars to explode as supernovae
c) Smaller neutron stars to decay by neutron-emission
d) Heavy nuclei to fission and/or emit neutrons, until
e) The last remaining neutron decays to H
1. "Neutron Repulsion" Video
www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0]www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0[/url]
2. "Neutron Repulsion" The APEIRON Journal
www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0]www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0[/url]
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
www.omatumr.com/
http://myprofile....anuelo09
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (7)
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
www.goodreads.com...E_Fisher
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (6)
http://mominer.ms...hildren/
Dr. Oliver Manuel arrested for multiple counts of rape and sodomy of his children
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
The only gas the black hole can absorb is gas which the companion star ejects normally.
If it was close enough to suck gas off the surface, the comapnion star would be in the final stages of a death spiral.
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (14)
Of course even Black Magic is more real than the Iron Sun or neutron repulsion which has no evidence of existence despite all the experiments that have been done with neutrons and all the observations of the Sun.
Here is that link that any remotely competent scientist would look at if they were interested at all in how neutrons behave.
http://www.physor...ons.html
Funny the way YOU keep avoiding it. A clear indication you don't want to sully your mind with reality.
Just keep running away Oliver. Keep proving me right and yourself wrong by default. I suppose you think that is better than alternative. Another loss in debate to a college dropout. If can't even come close to dealing with me Oliver you have no chance with your former colleagues.
Ethelred
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
You're exactly right.
In fact, the black hole would actually absorb LESS matter from the companion star on average than it did before it even became a black hole.
Why? A black hole's event horizon is so much smaller than the cross-section of a main sequence star.
it's simple geometry, the ejecta, radiation, and solar wind coming out of the companion star is actually more likely to collide with the full radius of a main sequence star than it is to be caught in the event horizon of a stellar mass black hole of the same mass and distance.
But let's not let REAL math or spacial analysis get in the way of the propaganda.
It's true that over a ridiculously long time a black hole would eat up ejecta, radiation, and stellar wind particles and therefore gain mass, but the "science fiction" artists conception is generally just BS.
Dec 16, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
In fact, in real systems, when one Star goes supernova, it "should" be more likely to eject it's companion in the explosion, than it would be to capture it.
After all, once it loses 1/3rd of it's mass in the explosion, the gravity that held the companion in place will actually be LOWER than it was when it was a main sequence star.
So if anything, the original companion should actually escape the system.
After all, if the Sun lost 1/3rd of it's mass in an explosion, the planets would all fly away on hyperbolic trajectories...
The black hole is actually more likely to collide with a completely different star, than it is to eat it's own "original" companion...
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
The reason being is the gravity well around the star which didn't explode doesn't at first change. What will happen though is it will wobble less as the newly lighter binary partner won't be able to jerk it around so much. As the companion star gathers some of the ejected mass from the supernova, it will become more massive and therfore will have a steeper gravity well. The black hole will therefore move in a bit. But this effect is probably quite minimal.
And, of course, this is presuming the explosive force is evenly distributed. If not, an acceleration in any direction might occur.
Think about it like this: Generally speaking, a tin can will orbit the earth in the same amount of time as the moon, at the same orbital distance.
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
Personally, I've noticed he engages much less and I think this isn't necessarily a good thing. It may be better for him and society to keep his mind occupied here, than elsewhere...
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
That I agree on. It is up to him to stop spamming and start engaging.
He is still on probation. He can't go far and he will be arrested if he goes to wrong places and his probation finds out.
Spamming doesn't take much time. He has a set of canned links and a few canned line repeats. I am not looking for him. IF he and I are on the same thread I have no reason not to reply.
If Physorg ever starts treating it as spam I will just hit the abuse button because he is abusing the site. In the meantime his posts should be responded to.
More
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
In this case he got a response directed at his science and his running away but on the same day he crapped on people in more than half his posts.
You are welcome to ignore him. I an not going to do that.
Deal with it however you wish.
Ethelred
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
I also keep in mind that you lie a lot. And that was yet another.
Like that one.
Coming from a sociopath that uses multiple logins and has pretended to be several persons in a conversation that is a bit rich.
Hmm.
Funny those don't look the same. You need to do something about those hallucinations.>>
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Now when are you going to explicitly and clearly lay out those propositions of your theory that you claim to have? I ask because you prefer to run away instead of answer that sort of question.
So goodbye.
Ethelred
Dec 17, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
But I do agree that responding to spammers tends to resemble spam, as well. And it usually appears more obnoxious than the original spam.
And presuming you can somehow convince the unreasonable to act reasonably, I suggest, is only an exercise in futility.
As I've had occasion to enjoy many of your science based posts, I'd much rather you spend your time discussing the science, yourself.
I've already discussed this with Callippo/Zephyr. It turns out there aren't any propositions. He just makes it all up as he goes along.
Dec 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
wow, just wow. thats bunch of fucking nonsense. the only person ive ever seen say anything more stupid is oliver and you actually got pretty close. you are one of the biggest spammers on the site and have multiple sock puppet accounts you spam from too. you have absolutely NO business talking about spamming. do you know how tired we are of your spamming too? aether this, ripples in a pond that, blah blah blah.
Dec 18, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Who hell the said I was presuming any such a thing?
On any site with moderation he would be gone or kept to the official Crank discussions. Anyone that thinks that people should just ignore them is simply not dealing with what happens when such people are unopposed. They usually don't go away. They usually get worse.
>>
Dec 18, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (7)
That was my point. He lied about having them. He also ran off rather than deal with that fact. I noticed this right about the time I saw a request for the 'predicates logics', I think it was, in an old post by Skeptic Heretic.
Ethelred
Dec 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
www.ipa.org.au/pu...c-alarms
2. Ignoring precise rest mass data on atoms that show:
a.) Neutrons attract protons to make stable atoms
b.) Neutrons repel other neutrons;
__Neutron-rich atoms are unstable
c.) Protons repel protons even more strongly;
__Proton-rich atoms are less stable
d.) A benevolent Reality sustains us in a "Cradle of the Nuclides"
www.amazon.com/Or...06465620
http://dl.dropbox..._Not.pdf
3. Their illusion of control will vanish when the public learns a pulsar gave birth to the Solar System and its elements and still controls our fate today.
http://dl.dropbox...asks.pdf
So be of good cheer!
O. K. Manuel
www.omatumr.com
http://myprofile....anuelo09
PS - The greatest danger is that frightened world leaders may act foolishly to preserve their false illusion of control
Dec 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Responding, periodically, to the spam to present the real science is good, but flaming the spammers is only detrimental to the over all quality of the discussion.
Whatever happend to Skeptic Heretic? He used to post some good stuff.
Dec 19, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Oh yes you keep ignoring your own evidence as well. That table PROVES there is no such thing as neutron repulsion because the neutron to proton ratios simply make no sense at all if neutrons repel each other.
He got tired of the idiots and moved over to ArsTechnia. Well that is what he claimed. I think he burned out trying to deal with Marjon's every idiot post. Marjon can produce stupidity at the speed of light and may be the only thing that repels neutrons.
Ethelred
Dec 24, 2011
Rank: not rated yet