NASA Planning for Possible Landings on Europa

December 15, 2011 By Paul Scott Anderson, Universe Today

NASA Planning for Possible Landings on Europa

Enlarge

Credit: NASA/Ted Stryk

All these worlds are yours except Europa, Attempt no landing there, Use them together use them in peace

Despite that famous cryptic warning in the film 2010: The Year We Make Contact, is planning for a possible attempted landing on ’s moon Europa. This is a mission that many people have been hoping for, since Europa is believed to have a liquid water beneath the icy (as well as lakes within the surface crust itself), making it a prime location in the search for life elsewhere in the solar system. Two landers are being proposed which would launch in 2020 and land about six years later.

As stated by Kevin Hand of JPL, ”Europa, I think, is the premier place to go for extant life. Europa really does give us this opportunity to look for living life in the ocean that is there today, and has been there for much of the history of the solar system.”

While the landers wouldn’t be able to access the ocean water which is well below the surface, they could analyze the surface composition with a mass spectrometer, seismometers and cameras. The mass spectrometer could detect organics on the surface if there are any. The landers probably wouldn’t last too long though, because of the intense radiation from Jupiter on the unprotected surface (as Europa has only a very slight, tenuous atmosphere). Accessing any of the water from its ocean or lakes would require drilling deep down, something for a more advanced future mission.

Another mission being considered is a Europa orbiter, which could also launch in 2020. In some ways that might be even better, as it could provide a broader detailed study of the moon over a longer time period. Of course if both missions could be done, that would be fantastic, but budgets will probably only allow for one of them. The lander mission is estimated to probably cost about $800 million to $2 billion, while an orbiter would cost about $4.7 billion.

It might be noted that a return mission to Saturn’s moon Enceladus would also be possible, especially since the water from its subsurface ocean or sea (depending on the various working models of its interior and geology) can be sampled directly from its water vapour geysers, no need to drill down. The Cassini spacecraft has already done that more than once, and has found organics of various complexities, but Cassini’s instruments can’t detect life itself.

Either destination would be exciting, as both are thought to be two of the most likely places in the solar system, besides Earth of course, to be inhabitable or even possibly inhabited. Everywhere on Earth where there is , there is . That may or may not be true for Europa or Enceladus, but we’ll never know unless we look.

Source: Universe Today

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (24)
$2 billion dollars ought to pay those inflated salaries for a few more decades, even as the government goes totally bankrupt and a puppet of the banks, which it really is already.
PieRSquare
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (6)
"You're a mean one, Mr Grinch..."
marksthomas
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (15)
Wow, comments are full of strange.

Omatumr wears a tinfoil hat.
FrankHerbert
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (64)
Omatumr probably wears a human face.

"It puts the lotion in the basket."
Nanobanano
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (21)
"We're going to spend $2 billion on tax dollars on a probe to Europa, but it won't be able to tell us much of anything we don't already know. That's for a future mission in 2030, which will cost thrice as much..." - NASA Spox...

NASA's space exploration fraud is exposed.

Spend $2 billion on a mission without any real chance of doing anything useful.

You could make a THOUSAND ten-megawatt wind turbines for that much money, which would be enough to power 2.5 MILLION homes for free for 30 years.

Instead, they choose to make more deficit spending on a useless tin can.
deatopmg
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3.6 / 5 (10)
@nanobraino; "You could make a THOUSAND ten-megawatt wind turbines for that much money, which would be enough to power 2.5 MILLION homes for free for 30 years." ... but only for about 30% of the time.

"Instead, they choose to make more deficit spending on a useless tin can."... and you choose to deficit spend on useless fiberglass wings and things that will only last a small fraction of your 30 yrs.
Mou
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
Do we really not have the technology to send something that can drill through the ice on Europa? Seems like a completely worthless mission. In 2026 we shall discover that there is no life on the surface and we will still be wondering if there is any under the ice.
plasticpower
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (13)
Wow, so much negativity! I'd be willing to pay $5/month in taxes for a couple years just to see high-res shots from Europa's surface. How cool would that be to see Jupiter from the surface of one of its moons?!

I do agree though, can't we use nuclear power to melt through the ice? We have antarctica to test that sort of thing on!
FrankHerbert
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (55)
^report abuse

I have no desire to learn omatumr's theories on dealing with "delinquent teenagers". I'm assuming it involves pederasty.

"The Paranoid Style in American Politics"
http://karws.gso....yle.html

"THE DOUBLE SUFFERER
...
We are all sufferers from history, but the paranoid is a double sufferer, since he is afflicted not only by the real world, with the rest of us, but by his fantasies as well."
Royale
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (7)
This isn't the only post today in which omatumr had to post that repetitive garbage. If I'm not going to read it the first time, I sure as hell won't the fourth time...
oh, and abuse reported.
As per the story, I thought that what was holding us back was the fact we'd need to figure out how to remotely drill over a mile through ice to get to the water... So if this is just for a surface mission I didn't think the surface is what we were interested in.
that_guy
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I'm going to go out on a limb and try something new in these comments by actually commenting on the missions described in the article.

I'm kinda biting my fingernails on which I would rather have. The Mars orbiter provides great information and pics. How do you thing they were able to find such good spots for the new pathfinder mission.

On the other hand, I really like the close ups and spot science that an orbiter can't provide.

I'm going to have to go with the orbiter first, then use that information to find the best drilling spot, and shelve the lander for now.

Unless they can muster the political will to get it all in one mission - an orbiter with an attached lander/driller - with the flexibility to choose a landing spot upon arrival.

it would be one very expensive mission, but it would be cheaper than a bunch of smaller missions.
ccr5Delta32
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
Europa is a must visit place , forget Mars .Whatever it cost in American tax dollars .I'm European and I totally approve of spending US tax $ on such a worthwhile project. We've had the technology now for 50 years ,since Apollo and according to Arther C Clark we're already two years late . What happened to that pioneering spirit ,the dreams of the visionaries ?
There are places where the ice has cracked and water has sploshed up and subsequently frozen holding a record of what was/is in the water.
Alternatively we/you could bail out the banksters for only 100 times the cost.
rubberman
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (11)
If you're European....why don't you just tell us what's there? ....Oh wait, nevermind
that_guy
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3.1 / 5 (7)
Europa is a must visit place , forget Mars .Whatever it cost in American tax dollars .I'm European and I totally approve of spending US tax $ on such a worthwhile project. We've had the technology now for 50 years ,since Apollo and according to Arther C Clark we're already two years late . What happened to that pioneering spirit ,the dreams of the visionaries ?
There are places where the ice has cracked and water has sploshed up and subsequently frozen holding a record of what was/is in the water.
Alternatively we/you could bail out the banksters for only 100 times the cost.

I'm american, and I totally approve of spending Europe's money to fund these missions.

We've ponied up so much for space missions in the past, it's time that the Europeans really start compensating us for allowing their 'astronauts' up into a station that they barely contributed to (1 module and a few supply missions) and taking them up to space on the shuttle throughout the decades.
ccr5Delta32
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (6)
@ that_guy I agree in principle . but "We've ponied up so much for space missions in the past," precisely "in the past " .Don't get me wrong I love America for the innovative visionary spirit it had as do just about all the world including the "muslim " nations . And does not the LHC count ? or the ITER .But still " One small step for man one giant step for mankind (including Chinese and all the other riffraff)
that_guy
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
@CCR
As opposed to the face that tevatron was the biggest accelerator for 20 years?

Look, apparently you missed the sarcasm in my remark because it was not a big **** contest, or about asking europe to pay its fair share.

I was pointing out that it's mildly rude the way you stated how you thought americans should spend their tax dollars. If you like the mission, then fine. We'll worry about what we will pay for or not - you are a little removed from america, and what our priorities should be.
ccr5Delta32
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
@ that_guy ,, "it's mildly rude the way you stated how you thought americans should spend their tax dollars." Yes it was ! and that was my sarcasm .I've being reading so many comments recently on some libertarian philosophy pertaining fiscal responsibility and I agree in principle .But for me this image http://www.spacei...353.html was worth all the cost .That's me
ccr5Delta32
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
@ that_guy Incidentally ,a while back a British science minister "if there is one " I'm not sure of the title . At a meeting discussing science/innovation it was reviled that Brittan was not exploiting these innovations in the marketplace .So it seemed reason enough for him to support defund science expenditure . Makes sense if you're a politician or a scumbag
SleepTech
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I'm disappointed in the prospects of this mission. Don't get me wrong, I would love to investigate Europa, but I'd like to do it right. In another article I read, they said they could provide more radiation protection for the landers, but they won't because of cost. So once again, cost is holding back scientific advancements. Costs which are relatively small compared to the one trillion dollars the US government spends every year on war and corporate welfare. Does it frustrate anybody else that we acknowledge potential scientific breakthroughs that could change humanity's perspectives on life as we know it, but we won't be able to do anything about it for decades because humanity would rather blow up missiles than build rockets?
Vendicar_Decarian
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
"Do we really not have the technology to send something that can drill through the ice on Europa?" - Mou

Yes. But there would be no drilling of course. The probe would drop a nuclear powered heating element onto the surface which would melt it's way through the ice, either keeping in touch with the lander via radio or through a trailing wire.

Getting to the surface is the hard part.

Vendicar_Decarian
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
"Costs which are relatively small compared to the one trillion dollars the US government spends every year on war and corporate welfare." - SleepTech

Space Science doesn't have anything like the U.S. military industrial complex to promote it. Unless of course the U.S. military industrial complex can use it to murder people.
Vendicar_Decarian
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
"Makes sense if you're a politician or a scumbag." - ccr5

Well... Conservatives are certainly scumbags.
Vendicar_Decarian
Dec 15, 2011

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
"You could make a THOUSAND ten-megawatt wind turbines for that much money, which would be enough to power 2.5 MILLION homes for free for 30 years." - nano

Imagine what could have been built with the anticipated cost of America's war crime in Afghanistan and Iraq? $4 trillion dollars.
Nanobanano
Dec 16, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Imagine what could have been built with the anticipated cost of America's war crime in Afghanistan and Iraq? $4 trillion dollars.


I wouldn't call it a war crime, but I know, I've done the math.

You can replace all our energy infrastructure, AND make the wind farms triple redundant over thrice the area to address the "only makes power when the wind blows" issue.

That is enough for 16 Terawatts worth of peak power, or 5.3 Terawatts worth of "1/3rd power".

But the Coal Tards and the shadow government would never allow something like that, because it makes too much sense.
spaceagesoup
Dec 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@ that_guy you're forgetting that whilst Americans pay more for space exploration than their European counterparts, it's Americans who enjoy the fruits of technological advance, military advantage, and happily (although maybe not consciously) fork over BILLIONS of dollars in taxes to tech that masquerades as space tech, but in the end is used to hold the rest of the world at ransom, create an atmosphere of fear and separatism, and blindly think they are the pioneering forward thinkers that they once sold us all on being. Europeans have more class :p
Rank 5 /5 (15 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Distance of planets from stars and revolution
    created5 hours ago
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study

(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.

Space & Earth / Environment

created 3 hours ago | popularity 3.7 / 5 (3) | comments 3 | with audio podcast

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 5 hours ago | popularity 4.8 / 5 (4) | comments 11 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 5 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (14) | comments 41


'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages

Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.

Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus

An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.