Medical robotics experts help advance NASA's 'satellite surgery' project

Dec 06, 2011
From the Robotorium at Johns Hopkins' Homewood campus in Baltimore, graduate students Tian Xia, left, and Jonathan Bohren used a da Vinci medical console, behind Bohren, to control an industrial robot at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 30 miles away. The test showed how medical robotics technology could help repair and refuel space satellites. Photo by Will Kirk/Homewoodphoto.jhu.edu

(PhysOrg.com) -- Johns Hopkins engineers, recognized as experts in medical robotics, have turned their attention skyward to help NASA with a space dilemma: How can the agency fix valuable satellites that are breaking down or running out of fuel? One option—sending a human repair crew into space—is costly, dangerous and sometimes not even possible for satellites in a distant orbit.

Another idea is now getting attention: Send robots to the rescue and give them a little long-distance human help. Johns Hopkins scientists say the same technology that allows doctors to steer a machine through delicate abdominal surgery could someday help an operator on Earth fix a faulty fuel line on the far side of the moon.

A brief preview of this technology was presented Nov. 29, when two graduate students at Johns Hopkins’ Homewood campus in Baltimore used a modified da Vinci medical console to manipulate an industrial robot at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., about 30 miles away. The demonstration took place during a tour of Goddard by three members of Maryland’s congressional delegation: U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski and U.S. Reps. Donna Edwards and Steny Hoyer.

In this demonstration, the da Vinci console was the same type that doctors use to conduct robotic surgery on cancer and cardiac patients. It included a 3D eyepiece that allowed the operator in Baltimore to see and guide the robot at Goddard. It also provided haptic, or “touch,” feedback to the operator. The goal, Johns Hopkins engineers say, is to adapt some robotic operating room strategies to help NASA to perform long-distance “surgery” on ailing satellites.

“We’re using the expertise we’ve developed in technology and applying it to some of the remote-controlled tasks that NASA wants space robots to perform in repairing and refueling satellites,” said Louis Whitcomb, a Johns Hopkins mechanical engineering professor who was at Goddard to help supervise the recent demonstration.

Goddard is the home of NASA’s Servicing Capabilities Office, which was set up in 2009 to continue NASA’s 30-year legacy of satellite servicing and repair, including missions to the Hubble Space Telescope. Its aims are to develop new ways to service satellites and to promote the development of a U.S. industry for conducting such operations.

To move toward these goals, provided a research grant to West Virginia University, which in turn picked Johns Hopkins as a partner because of the school’s expertise in medical robotics. One task the team has worked on is the use of a remote-controlled robot to carefully cut the plastic tape that holds a satellite’s thermal insulation blanket in place. The tape must be cut and the blanket pulled back in order to expose the satellite’s refueling port. A long-distance test of this procedure, in which an operator at Johns Hopkins will guide a robot through a tape-cutting procedure in West Virginia, is slated to take place soon.

The task will be much more challenging when the target satellite is in orbit around the moon, for example. Because of the distance, there will be a significant delay between the time the operator signals the robot to move and the time these instructions are received and carried out. The research team is working on technology to help compensate for this delay.

At Johns Hopkins, the project has provided an exciting hands-on research opportunity for Jonathan Bohren, of Westchester County, N.Y., a doctoral student in mechanical engineering, and Tian Xia, of Richland, Wash., a computer science doctoral student. In the recent demonstration at Goddard, Bohren and Xia controlled the robot from a workstation at Johns Hopkins.

“The long-range goal is to be able to manipulate a space robot like this from any location to refuel satellites, for instance,” Bohren said. “A lot of satellites have the potential to have their lives extended if we can do that.”

Some satellites cost millions or even billions of dollars to construct and launch. If a cost-effective robotic rescue is possible, Xia said, then abandoning spent satellites would be wasteful. “It would be like driving a fancy car and then ditching it after it runs out of fuel,” he said. “We already have a lot of computer-assisted surgical technology here at Johns Hopkins. We could use some of it to help fix and refuel satellites.”

Explore further: A guide to the 2014 Neptune opposition season

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Is the 'dead planet' full of life?

Nov 23, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- David Bowie asked it best in his 1971 song “Life on Mars?” But when it comes to the question of whether there’s currently life on the Red Planet, USC Dornsife professor Kenneth ...

Recommended for you

Mysteries of space dust revealed

9 hours ago

The first analysis of space dust collected by a special collector onboard NASA's Stardust mission and sent back to Earth for study in 2006 suggests the tiny specks open a door to studying the origins of the ...

A guide to the 2014 Neptune opposition season

14 hours ago

Never seen Neptune? Now is a good time to try, as the outermost ice giant world reaches opposition this weekend at 14:00 Universal Time (UT) or 10:00 AM EDT on Friday, August 29th. This means that the distant ...

Informing NASA's Asteroid Initiative: A citizen forum

Aug 28, 2014

In its history, the Earth has been repeatedly struck by asteroids, large chunks of rock from space that can cause considerable damage in a collision. Can we—or should we—try to protect Earth from potentially ...

Image: Rosetta's comet looms

Aug 28, 2014

Wow! Rosetta is getting ever-closer to its target comet by the day. This navigation camera shot from Aug. 23 shows that the spacecraft is so close to Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko that it's difficult to ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Osiris1
1 / 5 (1) Dec 06, 2011
Well they identified the major showstopper. Hey 'Robo' catch that falling bolt.....awww ya bozo ya dropped it and now it is covered with moon dust and unusable! And that was the ONLY one! Time lag the great destroyer of this idea. The greater the distance, the more the 'slow of light' is gonna hold us back. We may have to consider the robots as a closer team...really. Send up a 'mother ship' with 'motor pool' bays containing the robots in their garages along with their recharge facilities and extra tools. Have the controllers in the mother ship use the robots to fix the equipment, whatever it is, and install or remove, upgrade, modify, whatever, anything needing such work. All remotely, safely, remotely from operators in the mother ship. With outer doors sealed, those bays may be designed to be accessed safely from inside the ship for resupply, maintenance, etc. This takes away the light velocity delay penalty in repair operation. Course now we have to have motherships.
Osiris1
1 / 5 (1) Dec 06, 2011
Of course if the work is being done in a gravity well such as the moon, another piece of equipment need be carried by the mothership...shuttle craft. These would be needed to carry the robot labor force down to whatever surface, do the work, and return to the mothership after the work is done. Here light delays would be on the order of a few milliseconds given a low orbit, if necessary, of the mothership. Of course if a high orbit is desired due to the size of the mothership, a relay controller craft can be also based in the mothership. This relay controller could have the remote controllers in it and be in low orbit, with the duty of completing by remote control the work, and ordering and organizing remotely the cleanup and departure of the lander shuttle with 'tired' robots aboard. Then the relay controller could, its work done, itself return to the mothership as well. The mothership could be space propulsion and space based, never to return to earth. A station in itself.