Jury deliberates in $1B lawsuit against Microsoft

Dec 15, 2011 By PAUL FOY , Associated Press
In this Nov. 21, 2011 photo, Bill Gates arrives to testify at the Frank E. Moss federal courthouse in Salt Lake City. Closing arguments are set Tuesday Dec. 13,2011 in a $1 billion federal antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. Novell Inc. claims the software giant duped it into working on a new version of the WordPerfect writing program only to withdraw support months before Microsoft's Windows 95 was released. Novell claims it was later forced to sell WordPerfect for a $1 billion loss. (AP Photo/Jim Urquhart,File)

(AP) -- Jurors deliberating Wednesday in a Utah company's $1 billion federal antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. appeared confused, sending at least five questions to the judge, one of which couldn't be answered.

Novell Inc. sued Microsoft in 2004, claiming the Redmond, Wash.-based technology giant duped it into developing a version of its WordPerfect writing program for Windows 95 only to pull the plug so Microsoft could gain market share with its own word program.

Jurors started deliberating at about 8:45 a.m. Wednesday and didn't go home until about 7:45 p.m., the Salt Lake Tribune reported. They'll resume their discussions Thursday.

During the day, the judge received notes from the panel seeking clarification on some of the technical testimony throughout the two-month trial.

One message so baffled U.S. J. Frederick Motz that he told to simply disregard their own question in deliberations.

Tensions were high among lawyers waiting for what could be an enormous verdict. Novell is seeking up to $1.3 billion from Microsoft.

If the jury rules against Novell, its attorneys will have little to show for a decade of effort.

Throughout the trial, Novell lawyers argued that because its office products worked on multiple operating systems, Microsoft's snub of WordPerfect for Windows 95 was an illegal effort to maintain its monopoly.

Microsoft countered that it had valid business reasons to deny WordPerfect a set of software tools that threatened to crash new Windows technology. They say Novell could have worked around the problem but moved too slow.

Microsoft says Novell's ensuing loss of market share was its own doing because the company didn't develop a compatible WordPerfect program until long after the Windows 95 rollout. WordPerfect once had nearly 50 percent of the market for word processing, but its share quickly plummeted to less than 10 percent as Microsoft's own Office programs took hold.

"Novell was late. It was always behind. It was playing catch-up," Microsoft attorney David Tulchin said during closing arguments Tuesday.

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates testified last month that he had no idea his decision to drop a tool for outside developers would sidetrack Novell. He denied Novell's claim that Microsoft intentionally deceived the company.

Gates also said Novell just couldn't deliver a compatible WordPerfect program in time for the rollout, and that Microsoft's own Word program was actually better. He said that by 1994, the Word writing program was ranked No. 1 in the market, above WordPerfect.

Novell argued that Gates ordered Microsoft engineers to reject WordPerfect as a Windows 95 application because he feared it was too good.

Novell's lawsuit is the last major private antitrust case to follow the settlement of a federal antitrust enforcement action against Microsoft more than eight years ago. The trial began in October in federal court in Salt Lake City.

Novell is now a wholly owned subsidiary of The Attachmate Group, the result of a merger that was completed earlier this year.

Explore further: Apple counters talk it will shut Beats music service (Update)

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

What's at stake with Windows 9?

Sep 12, 2014

When Microsoft presents its first public glimpse of Windows 9 - it's expected to happen late this month or early next - a lot more than just an operating system is at stake.

Tablet sales slow as PCs find footing

Aug 30, 2014

Tablets won't eclipse personal computers as fast as once thought, according to studies by market tracker International Data Corporation (IDC).

Campus showcases high-performance buildings

Jul 01, 2014

Researchers at the Energy Department's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) are transforming the way the world uses energy—and those transformations become apparent the moment one sets foot on the NREL campus in ...

Recommended for you

Line says no IPO this year

22 hours ago

The Japan-based operator of popular mobile messaging app Line said Monday it has decided not to go ahead with an initial public offering in Japan or overseas this year.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dschlink
not rated yet Dec 15, 2011
Word better? I guess so if your name is Bill Gates. WordPerfect had capabilities in the early 90s that Microsoft didn't develop for almost a decade. Word achieving #1 ranking is a little like a book making the NY Times best-seller list because the author and affiliates are buying and giving away copies.
rexalfielee
not rated yet Dec 15, 2011
I know many WordPerfect users who hated using Word because it just wasn't as good as WordPerfect. Microsoft being proven to have been scum for a very long time. Bill, you were scum. Steve, you also were scum. Why don't you both follow Steve Jobs?...
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (2) Dec 16, 2011
Well, that is exactly what the Wall Street Journal has been doing. Padding it's subscriber list by giving away essentially free copies of it's newspaper to Conservative Propaganda groups in foreign countries.

"Word achieving #1 ranking is a little like a book making the NY Times best-seller list because the author and affiliates are buying and giving away copies." - DsChlink
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (2) Dec 16, 2011
The only question is... Was W95 a devious plot by MS to kill off Word Perfect?

Of course it was.

Windows 3.1 was vastly superior to W95 and all subsequent Microsoft operating systems.

mayan
1 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2011
Even Basic is not owned by micrsoft, its bought from others, altered it to Q-basic, DOS-software makers screens made microsoft copy & apply cosmetics and name it as windows, now microsoft OS on hard disk bloated to many GB in size with no new features than win98, win98 is other companies drivers, software, 3rd party inclusions etc etc

dotnet framework is based on ADA software....

asp was based on php language.....

Mirosoft thinks and advertises as if they invented the CPU and other hardware...