Japan 'was unprepared' for nuclear disaster: official probe

Dec 26, 2011 by Hiroshi Hiyama
The operators of the tsunami-stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant and government regulators were woefully unprepared for disaster, the first official probe into the March 11 catastrophe said Monday.

The operators of the tsunami-stricken Fukushima nuclear power plant and government regulators were woefully unprepared for disaster, the first official probe into the March 11 catastrophe said Monday.

An independent panel set up to investigate the events around the world's worst in a generation said Power (TEPCO) and the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency had failed to think beyond the risks for which the was designed.

"TEPCO did not take precautionary measures in anticipation that a severe accident could be caused by (a) tsunami such as the one (that) hit... Neither did the regulatory authorities," the report said.

"TEPCO did not incorporate measures against tsunamis exceeding the design basis. This indicates the limit of voluntary safety measures."

The panel's interim report sharply contrasted with TEPCO's own probe, which said the utility could have had no way to prepare for the 9.0-magnitude earthquake and that sparked meltdowns and explosions at the plant.

The 500-page document, based on interviews with 456 people involved in the accident, comes nine months after the crisis forced the evacuation of tens of thousands of people as radiation leaked into the air, sea and food chain.

The panel said its aim was not to apportion blame for the disaster, but to learn why the accident happened in the way it did.

TEPCO's accident management programmes assumed only relatively minor internal incidents such as mechanical failures and human errors, the panel said.

Risks such as "earthquakes and tsunamis were not included in the scope of consideration," the panel said, adding that regulatory bodies also failed to force TEPCO to establish thorough safety measures.

"Measures against severe accidents should not be left with the operator’s voluntary activities," the provisional English translation of the report said.

"The nuclear safety regulatory bodies should consider and determine legal requirements when they deem necessary."

Emergency procedures set out by TEPCO and the government were not followed and were found to be impractical, the report said.

For example, Fukushima workers mistakenly believed that the plant's cooling system was working even after the tsunami actually knocked it out. They then missed opportunities to correct that misunderstanding, the report said.

The error caused delays in the pouring of water into overheating reactor No. 1, which eventually went into meltdown and exploded, it said.

Communication failures among crews working on site left small groups of individuals to make their own decisions and meant that actions were not reported to supervisors.

Such errors also caused delays in the cooling of reactor No. 3, the panel said.

"Collection of accurate and most up-to-date information is a prerequisite for timely and appropriate decision-making. This issue, together with the need for providing information to the nation, is of a major concern," the report said.

TEPCO's "preparedness for such (an) accident as severe (as) damage at the core of (a) reactor as a result of natural disasters was quite insufficient".

The public's mistrust in the government grew as Tokyo repeatedly stressed that despite nuclear explosions, health risks were low, the panel said.

The government decided to withhold simulations of how radioactive materials from the wrecked plant could spread, while repeatedly playing down health worries.

"If the information were provided (in a timely way), it could have helped local governments and populations to choose (a) more appropriate route and direction of evacuation," the panel said.

The government also failed to use the simulation for itself due to miscommunication among officials, it said.

TEPCO and government officials did not ensure information flowed during the crisis, with bureaucrats failing to ask about the reactors, relying on the utility to report to them instead.

The panel also pointed to insufficient communication among government officials themselves.

It said a crisis management headquarters, headed by the premier, was launched in a fifth-floor office of the prime minister's residence, while working-level officials gathered at the crisis management centre in the basement of the same building.

The final version of the report is due to be published in summer 2012.

Explore further: Planned cut to renewable energy target 'a free kick' for fossil fuels

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Radioactive water leaked at second Japan plant

Dec 11, 2011

A Japanese nuclear plant leaked 1.8 tonnes of radioactive water from its cooling system, the government said, heightening safety worries as an atomic crisis continues at another plant.

Japan nuclear meltdown 'maybe worse than thought'

Dec 01, 2011

Molten nuclear fuel at Japan's Fukushima plant might have eaten two thirds of the way through a concrete containment base, its operator said, citing a new simulation of the extent of the March disaster.

Robots to gauge radiation in Japan's quake-hit plant

Apr 18, 2011

The operator of Japan's stricken nuclear plant said Sunday it will send two remote-controlled robots into a reactor building damaged by a hydrogen explosion to gauge radiation and temperature levels.

Recommended for you

Should the Japanese give nuclear power another chance?

2 hours ago

On September 9, 2014, the Japan Times reported an increasing number of suicides coming from the survivors of the March 2011 disaster. In Minami Soma Hospital, which is located 23 km away from the power plant, ...

UK wind power share shows record rise

5 hours ago

The United Kingdom wind power production has been enjoying an upward trajectory, and on Tuesday wind power achieved a significant energy production milestone, reported Brooks Hays for UPI. High winds from Hurricane Gonzalo were the force behind wind turbines outproducing nuclear power ...

Global boom in hydropower expected this decade

9 hours ago

An unprecedented boom in hydropower dam construction is underway, primarily in developing countries and emerging economies. While this is expected to double the global electricity production from hydropower, it could reduce ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
3 / 5 (2) Dec 26, 2011
Japan 'was unprepared' for nuclear disaster: official probe


No one expects the Spanish Inquisition.
Callippo
5 / 5 (2) Dec 26, 2011
Because they were flooded with 10 m tsunami wave at the same moment. We would probably feel "unprepared" too being at their place. But it's true, whole the risk of tsunami was deeply underestimated at Japan. In the same area the tsunami reached the height 24 m in 1933, the height 38 m in 1896. The Fukushima plant was destroyed with tsunami wave lower than 14 meters.
http://en.wikiped...rthquake
http://en.wikiped...rthquake
Pirouette
1.7 / 5 (7) Dec 26, 2011
That would be gross negligence on the part of the nuclear power plant admins, as well as local government for not ensuring some modicum of indestructibility of the core housings and related equipment. The flooding enveloping houses, et sl, was apparently unavoidable, as was the loss of lives and property. Japan as an island is in a bad location as it is. Perhaps they will be more prepared for the next earthquake and tsunami after this tragedy.
dacarls
not rated yet Dec 26, 2011
I was amazed to hear that the engineers cut down the cliff where the reactors were planned by about 25 feet to save money in pumping cooling water up so high. Apparently nobody paid attention to previous tsunami history there.
Bad decision, to go along with the other bad design decisions.
dan42day
1 / 5 (2) Dec 27, 2011
Yet another way that America rebuilt Japan in it's own image after WWII. If Japanese culture had prevailed, there would have been a run on fine cutlery over there by now instead of the American tradition of CYA.
Tausch
1 / 5 (1) Dec 27, 2011
Design for Demise.
Since nothing can trump Nature, design all objects for any demise. A demise of any nature of which the aftermath is harmless for anyone in the aftermath.
CHollman82
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 27, 2011
You can't fault people for not anticipating every possible eventuality.

But I agree with Tausch, if you design things to fail gracefully (as much as possible anyway) there's no need to try to predict the future.