High-energy lifestyles led to evolution of the sexes

December 19, 2011 By Peter Hurrell
High-energy lifestyles led to evolution of the sexes

Scientists are a step closer to explaining one of the most enduring mysteries of modern biology; why are there males and females?

Researchers at University College London have shown that by inheriting a certain set of genes from just one parent, the cells of sexually reproducing species could more efficiently produce the energy they need to survive.

"[Two] is not the evolutionary optimal number of sexes, or mating types, for a population," says Zena Hadjivasiliou, the who led the research. She adds: "You end up only being able to mate with fifty per cent of the population, so there must be some reason why it has spread."

To make their discovery, the scientists looked at one of the key differences between the sexes; during reproduction, males pass on only the genes from the of their cells. In contrast, females pass on all of the the offspring requires, including the both nuclear genes and a small extra set of genes in the tiny power-generating structures called mitochondria.

Mitochondria, which supply all of the energy the cell needs, contain a handful of genes that must work alongside the nuclear genes to control part of the process.

Using a mathematical model, the UCL team found that if one parent was prevented from contributing their to their offspring, it was easier for the remaining mitochondrial genes and the to coordinate their activities as they evolved over several generations. The result was that the cell functioned more efficiently. Ultimately, this would favour the evolution of two sexes, only one of which, the female, would pass on its mitochondria.

The researchers' model also showed that, although the advantage of having two sexes was fairly small in simple single-celled organisms, it was more pronounced when individual cells contained lots of mitochondria. This is particularly true of organisms that have high and are made up of many trillions of cells, like us.

In many sexually reproducing species, can be distinguished by their sex cells, eggs and sperm. The female produces a few large, immobile eggs while males produce many small, mobile sperm. But even in species with no obvious differences between the sex cells, researchers can still tell them apart. The key is that only the females pass their mitochondria, and the genes they contain, to their offspring.

It was this tiny difference that Hadjivasiliou and colleagues wanted to study, to see if it was enough to overcome the disadvantage of only being able to mate with half the population. Their idea was that if an organism inherited two different sets of mitochondria – one from each parent - the nuclear genome would not be able to evolve to work efficiently with both. As a result, the organism would be less healthy than others of its species that inherited just one set of mitochondria.

Their allowed the team to compare the effects on the fitness of a population of single-celled organisms of inheriting mitochondria from one parent with the effects of inheriting mitochondria from both.

The results clearly showed that populations in which mitochondria were inherited from just one parent were generally fitter.

Fitter individuals tend to reproduce more successfully, so they would eventually become the majority, allowing the evolution of two to spread. Through billions of years of evolution, these advantages persisted, resulting in the sexual division we're familiar with today.

The research appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Explore further: The cost of keeping eggs fresh for mother cockroaches

More information: Hadjivasiliou, Z, et al. Selection for mitonuclear co-adaptation could favour the evolution of two sexes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Published online: December 7, 2011, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1871

Related Stories

The cost of keeping eggs fresh for mother cockroaches

February 26, 2007

One of the defining differences between the sexes is in the size of their gametes. Males make many tiny sperm while females make only a few large eggs. This suggests that sperm are cheap while eggs are expensive.

The sexual tug-of-war -- a genomic view

March 15, 2010

The genes that are most beneficial to males are the most disadvantageous for females, and vice versa. However, this genetic conflict between the sexes is important in maintaining genetic variation within a species, researchers ...

Worms can evolve to survive intersex populations

December 6, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Sexually reproducing species need at least two sexes in order to produce offspring, but there are many ways that nature produces different sexes. Many animals (including humans and other mammals) use a chromosomal ...

Mitochondria and the great gender divide

December 9, 2011

(Medical Xpress) -- Why are there two sexes? It’s a question that has long perplexed generations of scientists, but researchers from UCL have come up with a radical new answer: mitochondria.

Recommended for you

Scientists overcome key CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing hurdle

December 1, 2015

Researchers at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT have engineered changes to the revolutionary CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system that significantly cut down on "off-target" ...

Scientists debate boundaries, ethics of human gene editing

December 1, 2015

Rewriting your DNA is getting closer to reality: A revolutionary technology is opening new frontiers for genetic engineering—a promise of cures for intractable diseases along with anxiety about designer babies.

Trap-jaw ants exhibit previously unseen jumping behavior

December 1, 2015

A species of trap-jaw ant has been found to exhibit a previously unseen jumping behavior, using its legs rather than its powerful jaws. The discovery makes this species, Odontomachus rixosus, the only species of ant that ...

Which came first—the sponge or the comb jelly?

December 1, 2015

Bristol study reaffirms classical view of early animal evolution. Whether sponges or comb jellies (also known as sea gooseberries) represent the oldest extant animal phylum is of crucial importance to our understanding of ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (2) Dec 19, 2011

Before differentiation of the sexes, organisms were hermaphrodites, these organisms produce both sperm and eggs, so they actually dont mix their mytohondria as well, so why didnt they evolved more than we do?(having the advantage to have sex with everybody not mixing the mytohondria)
not rated yet Dec 19, 2011

Before differentiation of the sexes, organisms were hermaphrodites, these organisms produce both sperm and eggs, so they actually dont mix their mytohondria as well, so why didnt they evolved more than we do?(having the advantage to have sex with everybody not mixing the mytohondria)

Your question will be answered in the next paper.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.