New evidence suggests large asteroid strike may have influenced Mercury's spin

Dec 12, 2011 by Bob Yirka report
Mercury. Credit: NASA

(PhysOrg.com) -- Planets orbiting a sun generally, but not always spin on their axis. Some spin east to west, others west to east. Those that don’t spin are said to be tidal locked with their sun; always showing it the same face, such as the moon does with planet Earth. In these instances, the planet tends to develop different properties than it would were it spinning. One side is cold, the other hot, for example leading to unique geophysical properties. Also because of the sun’s gravitational pull, more asteroids are likely to hit the far side of the planet, leaving more craters.

It’s partly because of evidence like this that a group of European researchers is proposing that Mercury, the planet closest to the in our solar system, was once tidal locked with the sun, but now is not, because, as they assert in their paper published in Nature Geoscience, it was knocked into its current by a large . They even have a likely crater made by the impact to back up their theory.

It’s called Caloris Basin, the largest impact crater on Mercury's surface, and it appears to be just the right size to fit the computer model the team has created. What happened, they suggest, is that long ago, Mercury had an east to west (retrograde) spin, but then over millions of years, slowed till it spun no more. Then, at some later time, the planet was struck by an asteroid large enough to cause it to begin spinning again. But this time, in the opposite direction, though not very fast, causing Mercury’s current 3/2 (three spins on its for every two trips around the sun) spin it has today.

The team points out that one side of Mercury clearly has more craters than the other, but perhaps more concretely suggest that the thus far inexplicable hollows inside the Caloris Basin could be the result of ice that was once buried by matter from the asteroid when it hit, then melted as sunlight began to fall on it as a result of the planet spinning again.

And finally, they say, the side that would have been the hot side before being struck by the asteroid would have been flatter than the opposite, more cratered side, do to molten activity. Evidence from Mariner 10 and MESSENGER, suggest that this is the case as well.

It all adds up, the team concludes, to a planet that once spun one way, stopped, then was knocked into spinning the other way.

Explore further: NASA asteroid defense program falls short: audit

More information: Mercury's spin–orbit resonance explained by initial retrograde and subsequent synchronous rotation, Nature Geoscience (2011) doi:10.1038/ngeo1350

Abstract
The planet Mercury rotates three times about its spin axis for every two orbits about the Sun, in a 3/2 spin–orbit resonance. This unique state has been explained by an initial rapid prograde rotation, which was then decelerated by tidal torques to the present resonance. When friction at the core–mantle boundary is accounted for, capture into the 3/2 resonance occurs with a probability of only 26%, whereas the most likely outcome is capture into one of the higher-order resonances7. Here we use a numerical model of Mercury’s rotational evolution to investigate the consequences of an initial retrograde rotation of Mercury. We find that in this case, the planet would be captured into synchronous rotation, with one hemisphere always facing the Sun, with a probability of 68%. Strong lateral variations in the impact cratering rate would have existed, consistent with the observed distribution of large impact basins. Escape from this highly stable resonance can be initiated by the momentum imparted by large, basin-forming impact events, and subsequent capture into the 3/2 resonance is likely. During synchronous rotation, substantial quantities of volatile deposits would have accumulated on the hemisphere facing away from the Sun, potentially explaining the existence of sublimation hollows on Mercury’s surface

Related Stories

Probing Question: Why does the Earth rotate?

Aug 06, 2007

We spend our lives on a spinning globe -- it takes only 24 hours to notice that, as night follows day and the cycle repeats. But what causes Earth to rotate on its axis?

NASA Spacecraft Streams Back Surprises From Mercury

Jan 31, 2008

The recent flyby of Mercury by NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft has given scientists an entirely new look at a planet once thought to have characteristics similar to those of Earth's moon. Researchers are amazed ...

MESSENGER Returns Images from Oct. 6 Mercury Fly-By

Oct 07, 2008

MESSENGER is the first mission sent to orbit the planet closest to the sun. On Oct. 6, 2008, at roughly 4:40 a.m. ET, MESSENGER flew by Mercury for the second time this year. During the encounter, the probe ...

Sunset Planet Alert

Apr 01, 2010

The solar system's innermost planets are about to put on a beautiful show.

Recommended for you

Image: Crescent Mimas

10 hours ago

A thin sliver of Mimas is illuminated, the long shadows showing off its many craters, indicators of the moon's violent history.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

fossilator
1 / 5 (1) Dec 12, 2011
"Planets orbiting a sun generally, but not always spin on their axis."

Does a non-spinning planet have an axis?
nkalanaga
1 / 5 (1) Dec 12, 2011
First, Mercury DOES spin. If it didn't, it would keep the same face to a distant star at all times, and the Sun would rise and set once per orbit.

Second, Mercury DOES NOT spin "backwards". Venus does. Mercury rotates in the same direction as its orbital motion, just like Earth and Mars.

The "resonant rotation" seems to be maintained by an eccentric orbit, with the same point facing the Sun every second perihelion (closest point to Sun).

That said, a very large impact could have affected the orbit and/or rotation, so the headline isn't unreasonable. The eccentricity could also be the result of gravitational perturbations by the other planets.
PJS
3 / 5 (2) Dec 12, 2011
you didnt read the article did you? they dont say that mercury has no spin, or that it spins backwards. they say it was once spinning, stopped, and got knocked into a counter-spin by a large asteroid..
jsa09
1 / 5 (1) Dec 12, 2011
Actually the article said that Mercury once was tidally locked. Which is different than saying that it did not spin. And different from saying it once had a spin.

A tidally locked planet does not see sun rise and set at all.

The article also said that before it was tidally locked that it had retrograde spin.

Sequence- retrograde spin - tidal lock - strike - opposite spin.

So PJS you are correct in your assessment (I think) just wanted to make it clearer. (I hope I did)
Cave_Man
1.3 / 5 (4) Dec 13, 2011
In the future we may discover that Venus was the the body which impacted Earth and formed our moon. That would be cool. This article, however, is not. It does mention some interesting points but nothing that really caught my attention.

Ahhhh astronomy, sometimes it gives you paradigm altering evidence of the largest structure known (the universe) and sometimes it gives you quirks about our backwater little nook.